中危国家进行胃癌内镜筛查的有效性--系统回顾和元分析协议》(Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Endoscopic Screening in Intermediate-Risk Countries - Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis)。
Maria Beatriz Mourato, Nuno Pratas, Andreia Branco Pereira, Filipa Taré, Raphael Chança, Inês Fronteira, Rui Dinis, Miguel Areia
{"title":"中危国家进行胃癌内镜筛查的有效性--系统回顾和元分析协议》(Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Endoscopic Screening in Intermediate-Risk Countries - Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis)。","authors":"Maria Beatriz Mourato, Nuno Pratas, Andreia Branco Pereira, Filipa Taré, Raphael Chança, Inês Fronteira, Rui Dinis, Miguel Areia","doi":"10.2196/56791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric Cancer (GC) is the fifth neoplasia with the highest incidence worldwide and the fourth with the highest mortality and its geographical distribution isn't homogeneous with high risk, intermediate-risk (IR) and low-risk areas. Advanced stage at diagnosis is related with high mortality of GC, but early detection greatly increases the chances of successful treatment. Upper endoscopy with biopsy is the gold-standard for diagnosis of GC. In IR countries, several studies have been developed to determine the relevance of endoscopic screening and how it could be developed. However most Western Societies continue to recommend screen only in selected populations with high-risk factors for GC. Furthermore, there are no systematic reviews on GC endoscopic screening in IR countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to determine the effectiveness and economic viability of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries, that will answer the research question: What is the effectiveness of endoscopic screening for GC in IR countries?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will include randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies and economic studies focusing on endoscopic screening of GC in asymptomatic population of IR countries. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Web of Science. Other grey literature sources will be additionally searched. Studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish published until September 2024 be included. Two independent reviewers screen the titles and abstracts of all search results. The selected studies will then be fully analyzed and the data will be collected and coded in a database. To minimize the risk of bias, the included studies will undergo a quality analysis according to Cochrane risk of bias tools, RoB 2 of randomized trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomized trials, QUADAS-2 for diagnostic test accuracy and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute study quality assessment tools for observational cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies. The data collected will be catalogued in 2 categories: efficacy/effectiveness data and economic data, and separate meta-analyses will be performed for each category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review is expected to provide results on the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening in an IR population. It is expected that the presentation of these results will shed light on the relevance of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries. The review is currently in the full-text screening stage and will be published in the first quarter of 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, this review will be the first to provide evidence on the effectiveness of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries. In doing so, we believe we will help guide future research, inform health care decisions and policy makers in this area, and support future decisions to implement GC screening programs in this type of population.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong>Prospero: CRD42024502174.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Endoscopic Screening in Intermediate-Risk Countries - Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Beatriz Mourato, Nuno Pratas, Andreia Branco Pereira, Filipa Taré, Raphael Chança, Inês Fronteira, Rui Dinis, Miguel Areia\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/56791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric Cancer (GC) is the fifth neoplasia with the highest incidence worldwide and the fourth with the highest mortality and its geographical distribution isn't homogeneous with high risk, intermediate-risk (IR) and low-risk areas. Advanced stage at diagnosis is related with high mortality of GC, but early detection greatly increases the chances of successful treatment. Upper endoscopy with biopsy is the gold-standard for diagnosis of GC. In IR countries, several studies have been developed to determine the relevance of endoscopic screening and how it could be developed. However most Western Societies continue to recommend screen only in selected populations with high-risk factors for GC. Furthermore, there are no systematic reviews on GC endoscopic screening in IR countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to determine the effectiveness and economic viability of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries, that will answer the research question: What is the effectiveness of endoscopic screening for GC in IR countries?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will include randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies and economic studies focusing on endoscopic screening of GC in asymptomatic population of IR countries. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Web of Science. Other grey literature sources will be additionally searched. Studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish published until September 2024 be included. Two independent reviewers screen the titles and abstracts of all search results. The selected studies will then be fully analyzed and the data will be collected and coded in a database. To minimize the risk of bias, the included studies will undergo a quality analysis according to Cochrane risk of bias tools, RoB 2 of randomized trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomized trials, QUADAS-2 for diagnostic test accuracy and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute study quality assessment tools for observational cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies. The data collected will be catalogued in 2 categories: efficacy/effectiveness data and economic data, and separate meta-analyses will be performed for each category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review is expected to provide results on the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening in an IR population. It is expected that the presentation of these results will shed light on the relevance of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries. The review is currently in the full-text screening stage and will be published in the first quarter of 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, this review will be the first to provide evidence on the effectiveness of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries. In doing so, we believe we will help guide future research, inform health care decisions and policy makers in this area, and support future decisions to implement GC screening programs in this type of population.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong>Prospero: CRD42024502174.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/56791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胃癌(GC)是全球发病率最高的第五大肿瘤,死亡率最高的第四大肿瘤,其地理分布并不均匀,有高风险区、中风险区(IR)和低风险区。晚期诊断与 GC 的高死亡率有关,但早期发现可大大增加治疗成功的几率。上消化道内窥镜检查和活检是诊断 GC 的黄金标准。在红外国家,已经开展了多项研究,以确定内镜筛查的相关性以及如何发展内镜筛查。然而,大多数西方学会仍然建议只对具有 GC 高危因素的特定人群进行筛查。此外,目前还没有关于红外国家 GC 内镜筛查的系统性综述:本综述旨在确定内镜 GC 筛查在红外国家的有效性和经济可行性,从而回答研究问题:内镜筛查 GC 在 IR 国家的有效性如何?我们将纳入随机对照试验、非随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究、横断面研究和经济学研究,重点关注在 IR 国家无症状人群中进行 GC 内窥镜筛查的情况。检索将在 MEDLINE、SCOPUS、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 中进行。此外,还将检索其他灰色文献来源。包括 2024 年 9 月之前以英语、葡萄牙语或西班牙语发表的研究。两名独立审稿人将对所有检索结果的标题和摘要进行筛选。然后将对所选研究进行全面分析,并在数据库中收集和编码数据。为了最大限度地降低偏倚风险,纳入的研究将根据科克伦偏倚风险工具、随机试验的 RoB 2 和非随机试验的 ROBINS-I、诊断测试准确性的 QUADAS-2 以及美国国家心肺血液研究所对观察性队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究的研究质量评估工具进行质量分析。收集到的数据将分为两类:疗效/效果数据和经济数据,并对每类数据分别进行荟萃分析:本系统综述预计将提供有关内窥镜筛查在红外人群中的疗效、有效性和成本效益的结果。预计这些结果的介绍将阐明在红外国家进行内镜下胆管癌筛查的意义。该综述目前正处于全文筛选阶段,将于 2025 年第一季度发表:据我们所知,这篇综述将是第一篇为内镜下胆管癌筛查在印度河沿岸国家的有效性提供证据的文章。我们相信,我们这样做将有助于指导未来的研究,为这一领域的医疗决策和政策制定者提供信息,并支持未来在这类人群中实施胃癌筛查计划的决策:临床试验:Prospero:CRD42024502174。
Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Endoscopic Screening in Intermediate-Risk Countries - Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: Gastric Cancer (GC) is the fifth neoplasia with the highest incidence worldwide and the fourth with the highest mortality and its geographical distribution isn't homogeneous with high risk, intermediate-risk (IR) and low-risk areas. Advanced stage at diagnosis is related with high mortality of GC, but early detection greatly increases the chances of successful treatment. Upper endoscopy with biopsy is the gold-standard for diagnosis of GC. In IR countries, several studies have been developed to determine the relevance of endoscopic screening and how it could be developed. However most Western Societies continue to recommend screen only in selected populations with high-risk factors for GC. Furthermore, there are no systematic reviews on GC endoscopic screening in IR countries.
Objective: This review aims to determine the effectiveness and economic viability of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries, that will answer the research question: What is the effectiveness of endoscopic screening for GC in IR countries?
Methods: We will include randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies and economic studies focusing on endoscopic screening of GC in asymptomatic population of IR countries. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Web of Science. Other grey literature sources will be additionally searched. Studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish published until September 2024 be included. Two independent reviewers screen the titles and abstracts of all search results. The selected studies will then be fully analyzed and the data will be collected and coded in a database. To minimize the risk of bias, the included studies will undergo a quality analysis according to Cochrane risk of bias tools, RoB 2 of randomized trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomized trials, QUADAS-2 for diagnostic test accuracy and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute study quality assessment tools for observational cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies. The data collected will be catalogued in 2 categories: efficacy/effectiveness data and economic data, and separate meta-analyses will be performed for each category.
Results: This systematic review is expected to provide results on the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening in an IR population. It is expected that the presentation of these results will shed light on the relevance of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries. The review is currently in the full-text screening stage and will be published in the first quarter of 2025.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this review will be the first to provide evidence on the effectiveness of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries. In doing so, we believe we will help guide future research, inform health care decisions and policy makers in this area, and support future decisions to implement GC screening programs in this type of population.