D Yitzchak Goldstein, Mark M Sasaki, Momka Narlieva, Nhi Nhan, Tianxi Liu, April Kegl, Tanjina Akter, Tanisha Dickerson, Eriel Thornton, Patricia Jim, Stephen Young, Danijela Lucic, Julie W Hirschhorn
{"title":"高通量 Alinity m Epstein-Barr 病毒定量测定的性能评估。","authors":"D Yitzchak Goldstein, Mark M Sasaki, Momka Narlieva, Nhi Nhan, Tianxi Liu, April Kegl, Tanjina Akter, Tanisha Dickerson, Eriel Thornton, Patricia Jim, Stephen Young, Danijela Lucic, Julie W Hirschhorn","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.01507-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molecular testing for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a cornerstone of care to prevent adverse outcomes in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the quantitative Alinity m EBV assay for plasma sample testing on the fully automated Alinity m platform. Assay lower limit of detection and precision were determined using commercially available panels in plasma. Alinity m EBV detected 100% of panels at 1.3 Log IU/mL, and precision ranged from 1.9% to 5.2% coefficients of variance (SD ≤ 0.14 Log IU/mL). Remnant-de-identified specimens initially tested with the Eurofins Viracor EBV Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) (<i>n</i> = 357), ELITech EBV LDT (<i>n</i> = 113), University of Washington (UW) LDT (<i>n</i> = 151), or Roche cobas EBV assay (<i>n</i> = 148) were subsequently tested with the Alinity m EBV assay. Comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay and Eurofins Viracor EBV assay demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.762 and mean bias of -0.48 Log IU/mL, comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with UW LDT demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.970 and mean bias of -0.24 Log IU/mL, and comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with cobas EBV demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.964 and mean bias of 0.35 Log IU/mL. The Alinity m EBV assay demonstrated high precision across the analytical measurement range and produced comparable results to the EBV test of record assays. These findings support the utility of the fully automated Alinity m EBV assay in transplant patient management.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and reactivation are associated with increased risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in transplant recipients with the development of PTLD occurring predominantly within a year of transplant. Quantitative PCR for EBV is used to monitor the viral load of EBV with a negative result as a good negative predictor of PTLD. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) with high sensitivity and specificity are available on fully automated high-throughput instruments to provide accurate quantitation and improve test result turn-around time. This study evaluates the analytical and clinical performance of one such NAAT, the Alinity m EBV assay.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0150724"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of the high-throughput quantitative Alinity m Epstein-Barr virus assay.\",\"authors\":\"D Yitzchak Goldstein, Mark M Sasaki, Momka Narlieva, Nhi Nhan, Tianxi Liu, April Kegl, Tanjina Akter, Tanisha Dickerson, Eriel Thornton, Patricia Jim, Stephen Young, Danijela Lucic, Julie W Hirschhorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.01507-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Molecular testing for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a cornerstone of care to prevent adverse outcomes in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the quantitative Alinity m EBV assay for plasma sample testing on the fully automated Alinity m platform. Assay lower limit of detection and precision were determined using commercially available panels in plasma. Alinity m EBV detected 100% of panels at 1.3 Log IU/mL, and precision ranged from 1.9% to 5.2% coefficients of variance (SD ≤ 0.14 Log IU/mL). Remnant-de-identified specimens initially tested with the Eurofins Viracor EBV Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) (<i>n</i> = 357), ELITech EBV LDT (<i>n</i> = 113), University of Washington (UW) LDT (<i>n</i> = 151), or Roche cobas EBV assay (<i>n</i> = 148) were subsequently tested with the Alinity m EBV assay. Comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay and Eurofins Viracor EBV assay demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.762 and mean bias of -0.48 Log IU/mL, comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with UW LDT demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.970 and mean bias of -0.24 Log IU/mL, and comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with cobas EBV demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.964 and mean bias of 0.35 Log IU/mL. The Alinity m EBV assay demonstrated high precision across the analytical measurement range and produced comparable results to the EBV test of record assays. These findings support the utility of the fully automated Alinity m EBV assay in transplant patient management.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and reactivation are associated with increased risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in transplant recipients with the development of PTLD occurring predominantly within a year of transplant. Quantitative PCR for EBV is used to monitor the viral load of EBV with a negative result as a good negative predictor of PTLD. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) with high sensitivity and specificity are available on fully automated high-throughput instruments to provide accurate quantitation and improve test result turn-around time. This study evaluates the analytical and clinical performance of one such NAAT, the Alinity m EBV assay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0150724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01507-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01507-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒(EBV)感染的分子检测是预防包括移植受者在内的免疫功能低下患者出现不良后果的护理基石。我们评估了全自动 Alinity m 平台上用于血浆样本检测的 Alinity m EBV 定量测定的分析和临床性能。检测下限和精确度是使用血浆中的市售试剂盒测定的。Alinity m EBV在1.3 Log IU/mL时100%检测到,精度范围为1.9%至5.2%的方差系数(SD ≤ 0.14 Log IU/mL)。最初用 Eurofins Viracor EBV 实验室开发检验(LDT)(n = 357)、ELITech EBV LDT(n = 113)、华盛顿大学(UW)LDT(n = 151)或罗氏 cobas EBV 检测试剂盒(n = 148)检测的残留鉴定标本随后用 Alinity m EBV 检测试剂盒进行检测。Alinity m EBV测定法与Eurofins Viracor EBV测定法的相关系数为0.762,平均偏差为-0.48 Log IU/mL;Alinity m EBV测定法与华大LDT测定法的相关系数为0.970,平均偏差为-0.24 Log IU/mL;Alinity m EBV测定法与cobas EBV测定法的相关系数为0.964,平均偏差为0.35 Log IU/mL。Alinity m EBV 检测法在整个分析测量范围内都表现出很高的精确度,其结果与记录检测法的 EBV 检测结果相当。这些研究结果支持全自动 Alinity m EBV 检测法在移植患者管理中的应用:重要意义:EB病毒(EBV)感染和再激活与移植受者发生移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病(PTLD)的风险增加有关,PTLD主要发生在移植后一年内。EBV 定量 PCR 用于监测 EBV 病毒载量,阴性结果是 PTLD 的良好阴性预测指标。全自动高通量仪器上的核酸扩增检验(NAAT)具有高灵敏度和特异性,可提供精确的定量结果并缩短检验结果的周转时间。本研究评估了Alinity m EBV检测法这种NAAT的分析和临床性能。
Performance evaluation of the high-throughput quantitative Alinity m Epstein-Barr virus assay.
Molecular testing for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a cornerstone of care to prevent adverse outcomes in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the quantitative Alinity m EBV assay for plasma sample testing on the fully automated Alinity m platform. Assay lower limit of detection and precision were determined using commercially available panels in plasma. Alinity m EBV detected 100% of panels at 1.3 Log IU/mL, and precision ranged from 1.9% to 5.2% coefficients of variance (SD ≤ 0.14 Log IU/mL). Remnant-de-identified specimens initially tested with the Eurofins Viracor EBV Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) (n = 357), ELITech EBV LDT (n = 113), University of Washington (UW) LDT (n = 151), or Roche cobas EBV assay (n = 148) were subsequently tested with the Alinity m EBV assay. Comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay and Eurofins Viracor EBV assay demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.762 and mean bias of -0.48 Log IU/mL, comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with UW LDT demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.970 and mean bias of -0.24 Log IU/mL, and comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with cobas EBV demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.964 and mean bias of 0.35 Log IU/mL. The Alinity m EBV assay demonstrated high precision across the analytical measurement range and produced comparable results to the EBV test of record assays. These findings support the utility of the fully automated Alinity m EBV assay in transplant patient management.
Importance: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and reactivation are associated with increased risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in transplant recipients with the development of PTLD occurring predominantly within a year of transplant. Quantitative PCR for EBV is used to monitor the viral load of EBV with a negative result as a good negative predictor of PTLD. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) with high sensitivity and specificity are available on fully automated high-throughput instruments to provide accurate quantitation and improve test result turn-around time. This study evaluates the analytical and clinical performance of one such NAAT, the Alinity m EBV assay.
期刊介绍:
Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.