加强神经遗传学中意义不确定变体 (VUS) 的解释:一家三级医疗中心的合作经验。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Medical Genetics Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1136/jmg-2024-110122
Kayla Horowitz, Nellie H Fotopoulos, Alana J Mistry, Justin Simo, Miranda Medeiros, Isabela D Bucco, Mia Ginsberg, Emily Dwosh, Roberta La Piana, Guy A Rouleau, Allison A Dilliott, Sali M K Farhan
{"title":"加强神经遗传学中意义不确定变体 (VUS) 的解释:一家三级医疗中心的合作经验。","authors":"Kayla Horowitz, Nellie H Fotopoulos, Alana J Mistry, Justin Simo, Miranda Medeiros, Isabela D Bucco, Mia Ginsberg, Emily Dwosh, Roberta La Piana, Guy A Rouleau, Allison A Dilliott, Sali M K Farhan","doi":"10.1136/jmg-2024-110122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The findings of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) on a clinical genetic testing report pose a challenge for attending healthcare professionals (HCPs) in patient care. Here, we describe the outcomes of multidisciplinary VUS Rounds, implemented at a neurological disease tertiary care centre, which aid in interpreting and communicating VUS identified in our neurogenetics patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VUS Rounds brought together genetic counsellors, molecular geneticists and scientists to evaluate VUS against genomic and phenotypic evidence and assign an internal temperature classification of 'VUS Hot', 'True VUS' or 'VUS Cold', corresponding to potential pathogenicity. Biweekly meetings were held among the committee to deliberate variant classifications, determine additional clinical management actions and discuss nuances of VUS result communication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 143 VUS identified in 72 individuals with neurological disease were curated between October 2022 and December 2023. Of these, 12.6% were classified as VUS Hot, carried by 22.2% of the individuals, allowing for prioritisation of additional evaluation to determine potential pathogenicity of the variants, such as clinical follow-up or segregation analysis. In contrast, 45.4% of VUS were Cold and could be eliminated from further consideration in the carrier's care. We thoroughly evaluated the various evidence that contributed to our VUS classifications and resulting clinical actions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The assessment of VUS leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration allowed us to delineate required follow-up analyses for our neurology patient population. Integration of VUS Rounds into healthcare practices ensures equitable knowledge dissemination among HCPs and effective incorporation of uncertain genetic results into patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing variant of uncertain significance (VUS) interpretation in neurogenetics: collaborative experiences from a tertiary care centre.\",\"authors\":\"Kayla Horowitz, Nellie H Fotopoulos, Alana J Mistry, Justin Simo, Miranda Medeiros, Isabela D Bucco, Mia Ginsberg, Emily Dwosh, Roberta La Piana, Guy A Rouleau, Allison A Dilliott, Sali M K Farhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jmg-2024-110122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The findings of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) on a clinical genetic testing report pose a challenge for attending healthcare professionals (HCPs) in patient care. Here, we describe the outcomes of multidisciplinary VUS Rounds, implemented at a neurological disease tertiary care centre, which aid in interpreting and communicating VUS identified in our neurogenetics patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VUS Rounds brought together genetic counsellors, molecular geneticists and scientists to evaluate VUS against genomic and phenotypic evidence and assign an internal temperature classification of 'VUS Hot', 'True VUS' or 'VUS Cold', corresponding to potential pathogenicity. Biweekly meetings were held among the committee to deliberate variant classifications, determine additional clinical management actions and discuss nuances of VUS result communication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 143 VUS identified in 72 individuals with neurological disease were curated between October 2022 and December 2023. Of these, 12.6% were classified as VUS Hot, carried by 22.2% of the individuals, allowing for prioritisation of additional evaluation to determine potential pathogenicity of the variants, such as clinical follow-up or segregation analysis. In contrast, 45.4% of VUS were Cold and could be eliminated from further consideration in the carrier's care. We thoroughly evaluated the various evidence that contributed to our VUS classifications and resulting clinical actions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The assessment of VUS leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration allowed us to delineate required follow-up analyses for our neurology patient population. Integration of VUS Rounds into healthcare practices ensures equitable knowledge dissemination among HCPs and effective incorporation of uncertain genetic results into patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-110122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-110122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床基因检测报告中发现的意义不确定变异(VUS)给医护人员(HCP)的患者护理工作带来了挑战。在此,我们介绍了在神经系统疾病三级医疗中心开展的多学科 VUS Rounds 的成果,该成果有助于解释和交流在神经遗传学患者群体中发现的 VUS:VUS Rounds汇集了遗传咨询师、分子遗传学家和科学家,他们根据基因组和表型证据对VUS进行评估,并根据潜在致病性将VUS分为 "热VUS"、"真VUS "或 "冷VUS"。委员会每两周召开一次会议,审议变异分类,确定其他临床管理措施,并讨论 VUS 结果交流的细微差别:2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 12 月期间,共对 72 名神经系统疾病患者中发现的 143 个 VUS 进行了策划。其中,12.6%被归类为VUS Hot,由22.2%的个体携带,可优先进行额外评估,以确定变异的潜在致病性,如临床随访或分离分析。与此相反,45.4% 的 VUS 为冷变异,在对携带者的治疗中可不予考虑。我们全面评估了有助于我们进行 VUS 分类和临床行动的各种证据:结论:通过多学科合作对 VUS 进行评估,我们能够为神经内科患者群体确定所需的后续分析。将 VUS Rounds 纳入医疗实践可确保在 HCPs 中公平传播知识,并将不确定的基因结果有效纳入患者护理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing variant of uncertain significance (VUS) interpretation in neurogenetics: collaborative experiences from a tertiary care centre.

Background: The findings of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) on a clinical genetic testing report pose a challenge for attending healthcare professionals (HCPs) in patient care. Here, we describe the outcomes of multidisciplinary VUS Rounds, implemented at a neurological disease tertiary care centre, which aid in interpreting and communicating VUS identified in our neurogenetics patient population.

Methods: VUS Rounds brought together genetic counsellors, molecular geneticists and scientists to evaluate VUS against genomic and phenotypic evidence and assign an internal temperature classification of 'VUS Hot', 'True VUS' or 'VUS Cold', corresponding to potential pathogenicity. Biweekly meetings were held among the committee to deliberate variant classifications, determine additional clinical management actions and discuss nuances of VUS result communication.

Results: In total, 143 VUS identified in 72 individuals with neurological disease were curated between October 2022 and December 2023. Of these, 12.6% were classified as VUS Hot, carried by 22.2% of the individuals, allowing for prioritisation of additional evaluation to determine potential pathogenicity of the variants, such as clinical follow-up or segregation analysis. In contrast, 45.4% of VUS were Cold and could be eliminated from further consideration in the carrier's care. We thoroughly evaluated the various evidence that contributed to our VUS classifications and resulting clinical actions.

Conclusions: The assessment of VUS leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration allowed us to delineate required follow-up analyses for our neurology patient population. Integration of VUS Rounds into healthcare practices ensures equitable knowledge dissemination among HCPs and effective incorporation of uncertain genetic results into patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Genetics
Journal of Medical Genetics 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Genetics is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering original research in human genetics, including reviews of and opinion on the latest developments. Articles cover the molecular basis of human disease including germline cancer genetics, clinical manifestations of genetic disorders, applications of molecular genetics to medical practice and the systematic evaluation of such applications worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and mutational signatures of CRB1-associated retinopathies: a multicentre study. Enhancing variant of uncertain significance (VUS) interpretation in neurogenetics: collaborative experiences from a tertiary care centre. Long-read sequencing for detection and subtyping of Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. Heterozygous de novo variants in HSPD1 cause hypomyelinating leukodystrophy through impaired HSP60 oligomerisation. Six at Sixty. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in NF1: 20-year review of a highly cited paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1