Thomas Hilser, Christopher Darr, Umut-Ulas Yesilyurt, Niklas Klümper, Katrin Schlack, Viktor Grünwald
{"title":"[转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌的当代治疗]。","authors":"Thomas Hilser, Christopher Darr, Umut-Ulas Yesilyurt, Niklas Klümper, Katrin Schlack, Viktor Grünwald","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02472-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in Germany with an increasing incidence. Drug therapy is indicated in relapsed or metastatic disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The article is based on the content of the recent guidelines and a selective literature search.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combination therapies based on a checkpoint inhibitor are the current standard in first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The median overall survival could thus be extended to > 50 months. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score is used for risk classification. When selecting a suitable combination therapy, it is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages for each individual patient. There is currently no standard for follow-up therapies. So far, combination therapies have not shown any significant advantage in second-line treatment. It is recommended to switch to a substance that has not yet been used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, one purely immuno-oncology combination and four combinations of one immune checkpoint inhibitor and one tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) are approved for first-line therapy in Germany. The added value of further intensification of therapy, in particular through triple combinations or further combination therapy in the second line, has not yet been proven.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Contemporary treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma].\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hilser, Christopher Darr, Umut-Ulas Yesilyurt, Niklas Klümper, Katrin Schlack, Viktor Grünwald\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00120-024-02472-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in Germany with an increasing incidence. Drug therapy is indicated in relapsed or metastatic disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The article is based on the content of the recent guidelines and a selective literature search.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combination therapies based on a checkpoint inhibitor are the current standard in first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The median overall survival could thus be extended to > 50 months. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score is used for risk classification. When selecting a suitable combination therapy, it is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages for each individual patient. There is currently no standard for follow-up therapies. So far, combination therapies have not shown any significant advantage in second-line treatment. It is recommended to switch to a substance that has not yet been used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, one purely immuno-oncology combination and four combinations of one immune checkpoint inhibitor and one tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) are approved for first-line therapy in Germany. The added value of further intensification of therapy, in particular through triple combinations or further combination therapy in the second line, has not yet been proven.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-024-02472-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-024-02472-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Contemporary treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma].
Background: Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in Germany with an increasing incidence. Drug therapy is indicated in relapsed or metastatic disease.
Materials and methods: The article is based on the content of the recent guidelines and a selective literature search.
Results: Combination therapies based on a checkpoint inhibitor are the current standard in first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The median overall survival could thus be extended to > 50 months. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score is used for risk classification. When selecting a suitable combination therapy, it is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages for each individual patient. There is currently no standard for follow-up therapies. So far, combination therapies have not shown any significant advantage in second-line treatment. It is recommended to switch to a substance that has not yet been used.
Conclusions: Currently, one purely immuno-oncology combination and four combinations of one immune checkpoint inhibitor and one tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) are approved for first-line therapy in Germany. The added value of further intensification of therapy, in particular through triple combinations or further combination therapy in the second line, has not yet been proven.