比较转录组分析揭示了肝胆癌的分子异质性。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102192
Nabanita Roy , Ria Lodh , Susmita Mandal , Mohit Kumar Jolly , Anupam Sarma , Dhruba Kumar Bhattacharyya , Pankaj Barah
{"title":"比较转录组分析揭示了肝胆癌的分子异质性。","authors":"Nabanita Roy ,&nbsp;Ria Lodh ,&nbsp;Susmita Mandal ,&nbsp;Mohit Kumar Jolly ,&nbsp;Anupam Sarma ,&nbsp;Dhruba Kumar Bhattacharyya ,&nbsp;Pankaj Barah","doi":"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hepatobiliary cancers (HBCs) pose a major global health challenge, with a lack of effective targeted biomarkers. Due to their complex anatomical locations, shared risk factors, and the limitations of targeted therapies, generalized treatment strategies are often used for gallbladder cancer (GBC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study aimed to identify specific transcriptomic signatures in GBC, HCC, and ICC. The transcriptomic data analysis revealed distinct expression profiles, highlighting complex molecular heterogeneity within these cancers, even within the same organ system. Functional annotation revealed distinct biological pathways associated with each type of HBCs. GBC was linked to cell cycle regulation, HCC was associated with immune system modulation, and ICC was involved in metabolic dysregulation, particularly lipid metabolism. Gene co-expression network (GCN) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analyses identified potential key genes, such as <em>MAPK3</em> and <em>ERBB2</em> in GBC, <em>AC069287.1</em> and <em>ACTN2</em> in HCC, and <em>TRPC1</em> and <em>BACE1</em> in ICC. The FOX family of transcription factors (TFs) was conserved across all three cancer types. To further explore the relationship between Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and the identified hub genes and TFs, an EMT score analysis was conducted. This analysis revealed distinct phenotypic characteristics in each cancer type, with TFs identified in GBC and ICC showing a stronger correlation with EMT compared to those in HCC. External validation using <em>The Cancer Genome Atlas</em> (TCGA) databases confirmed the expression of candidate genes, underscoring their potential as therapeutic targets. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular heterogeneity and complexity of HBCs, opening new avenues for personalized therapeutic interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48975,"journal":{"name":"Translational Oncology","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 102192"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative transcriptomic analysis uncovers molecular heterogeneity in hepatobiliary cancers\",\"authors\":\"Nabanita Roy ,&nbsp;Ria Lodh ,&nbsp;Susmita Mandal ,&nbsp;Mohit Kumar Jolly ,&nbsp;Anupam Sarma ,&nbsp;Dhruba Kumar Bhattacharyya ,&nbsp;Pankaj Barah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hepatobiliary cancers (HBCs) pose a major global health challenge, with a lack of effective targeted biomarkers. Due to their complex anatomical locations, shared risk factors, and the limitations of targeted therapies, generalized treatment strategies are often used for gallbladder cancer (GBC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study aimed to identify specific transcriptomic signatures in GBC, HCC, and ICC. The transcriptomic data analysis revealed distinct expression profiles, highlighting complex molecular heterogeneity within these cancers, even within the same organ system. Functional annotation revealed distinct biological pathways associated with each type of HBCs. GBC was linked to cell cycle regulation, HCC was associated with immune system modulation, and ICC was involved in metabolic dysregulation, particularly lipid metabolism. Gene co-expression network (GCN) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analyses identified potential key genes, such as <em>MAPK3</em> and <em>ERBB2</em> in GBC, <em>AC069287.1</em> and <em>ACTN2</em> in HCC, and <em>TRPC1</em> and <em>BACE1</em> in ICC. The FOX family of transcription factors (TFs) was conserved across all three cancer types. To further explore the relationship between Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and the identified hub genes and TFs, an EMT score analysis was conducted. This analysis revealed distinct phenotypic characteristics in each cancer type, with TFs identified in GBC and ICC showing a stronger correlation with EMT compared to those in HCC. External validation using <em>The Cancer Genome Atlas</em> (TCGA) databases confirmed the expression of candidate genes, underscoring their potential as therapeutic targets. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular heterogeneity and complexity of HBCs, opening new avenues for personalized therapeutic interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324003188\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324003188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于缺乏有效的靶向生物标志物,肝胆癌(HBC)对全球健康构成了重大挑战。由于胆囊癌(GBC)、肝细胞癌(HCC)和肝内胆管癌(ICC)的解剖位置复杂、具有共同的风险因素以及靶向治疗的局限性,因此通常采用通用的治疗策略。本研究旨在确定 GBC、HCC 和 ICC 的特定转录组特征。转录组数据分析揭示了不同的表达谱,凸显了这些癌症内部复杂的分子异质性,即使在同一器官系统中也是如此。功能注释揭示了与每种类型的 HBC 相关的不同生物通路。GBC与细胞周期调控有关,HCC与免疫系统调节有关,而ICC则涉及代谢失调,尤其是脂质代谢。基因共表达网络(GCN)和蛋白相互作用(PPI)网络分析发现了潜在的关键基因,如GBC中的MAPK3和ERBB2、HCC中的AC069287.1和ACTN2以及ICC中的TRPC1和BACE1。FOX转录因子家族在所有三种癌症类型中都是保守的。为了进一步探讨上皮-间质转化(EMT)与已确定的枢纽基因和转录因子之间的关系,我们进行了一项EMT评分分析。该分析揭示了每种癌症类型的不同表型特征,与HCC相比,在GBC和ICC中发现的TF与EMT的相关性更强。利用癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据库进行的外部验证证实了候选基因的表达,凸显了它们作为治疗靶点的潜力。这些发现为了解 HBCs 的分子异质性和复杂性提供了有价值的见解,为个性化治疗干预开辟了新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative transcriptomic analysis uncovers molecular heterogeneity in hepatobiliary cancers
Hepatobiliary cancers (HBCs) pose a major global health challenge, with a lack of effective targeted biomarkers. Due to their complex anatomical locations, shared risk factors, and the limitations of targeted therapies, generalized treatment strategies are often used for gallbladder cancer (GBC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study aimed to identify specific transcriptomic signatures in GBC, HCC, and ICC. The transcriptomic data analysis revealed distinct expression profiles, highlighting complex molecular heterogeneity within these cancers, even within the same organ system. Functional annotation revealed distinct biological pathways associated with each type of HBCs. GBC was linked to cell cycle regulation, HCC was associated with immune system modulation, and ICC was involved in metabolic dysregulation, particularly lipid metabolism. Gene co-expression network (GCN) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analyses identified potential key genes, such as MAPK3 and ERBB2 in GBC, AC069287.1 and ACTN2 in HCC, and TRPC1 and BACE1 in ICC. The FOX family of transcription factors (TFs) was conserved across all three cancer types. To further explore the relationship between Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and the identified hub genes and TFs, an EMT score analysis was conducted. This analysis revealed distinct phenotypic characteristics in each cancer type, with TFs identified in GBC and ICC showing a stronger correlation with EMT compared to those in HCC. External validation using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases confirmed the expression of candidate genes, underscoring their potential as therapeutic targets. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular heterogeneity and complexity of HBCs, opening new avenues for personalized therapeutic interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
314
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Translational Oncology publishes the results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of oncology patients. Translational Oncology will publish laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer. Peer reviewed manuscript types include Original Reports, Reviews and Editorials.
期刊最新文献
Clinical efficacies of different neoadjuvant therapies for non-small cell lung cancer Integrated multi-omics demonstrates enhanced antitumor efficacy of donafenib combined with FADS2 inhibition in hepatocellular carcinoma Disruption of bioenergetics enhances the radio-sensitivity of patient-derived glioblastoma tumorspheres KRas plays a negative role in regulating IDO1 expression Comparative transcriptomic analysis uncovers molecular heterogeneity in hepatobiliary cancers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1