转移性膀胱癌治疗指南与实际数据对比:基于人群的一线化疗模式研究。

Ellis Slotman, Anke Richters, Heidi P Fransen, Tineke J Smilde, Yvette M van der Linden, Sabine Siesling, Katja K H Aben, Natasja J H Raijmakers
{"title":"转移性膀胱癌治疗指南与实际数据对比:基于人群的一线化疗模式研究。","authors":"Ellis Slotman, Anke Richters, Heidi P Fransen, Tineke J Smilde, Yvette M van der Linden, Sabine Siesling, Katja K H Aben, Natasja J H Raijmakers","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For patients with metastatic bladder cancer (mBC) palliative chemotherapy is one of the main treatment options. Real-world insights into outcomes are available, but a comprehensive overview of specific treatment details like number of chemotherapy cycles received and (reasons for) adjustments is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based study was conducted, including all patients diagnosed with mBC in the Netherlands between 2016 and 2021 who started chemotherapy as initial treatment. Data on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, including number of cycles, adjustments and reasons for adjustments, and survival were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Treatment patterns and outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with receiving the full guideline-recommended treatment (4-6 cycles).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 684 patients started first-line chemotherapy, mostly carboplatin-based (54%). Of these patients, 35% did not receive the full course of treatment. Among these patients who received <4 cycles, 24% died within one month of stopping treatment. Male sex and good performance status were independently associated with receiving the full course of treatment. Among patients who did receive a full course of treatment, half still had adjustments to their treatment schedule, which mainly included dose reductions due to side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with mBC starting first-line chemotherapy, only a small majority received the recommended number of cycles, and treatment adjustments were common. This suggests that adhering to recommended treatment is challenging, emphasizing the importance of integrating insights on treatment discontinuation and modifications into the shared decision-making process and guideline development.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines versus real-world data in metastatic bladder cancer: A population-based study on first-line chemotherapy treatment patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Ellis Slotman, Anke Richters, Heidi P Fransen, Tineke J Smilde, Yvette M van der Linden, Sabine Siesling, Katja K H Aben, Natasja J H Raijmakers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For patients with metastatic bladder cancer (mBC) palliative chemotherapy is one of the main treatment options. Real-world insights into outcomes are available, but a comprehensive overview of specific treatment details like number of chemotherapy cycles received and (reasons for) adjustments is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based study was conducted, including all patients diagnosed with mBC in the Netherlands between 2016 and 2021 who started chemotherapy as initial treatment. Data on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, including number of cycles, adjustments and reasons for adjustments, and survival were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Treatment patterns and outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with receiving the full guideline-recommended treatment (4-6 cycles).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 684 patients started first-line chemotherapy, mostly carboplatin-based (54%). Of these patients, 35% did not receive the full course of treatment. Among these patients who received <4 cycles, 24% died within one month of stopping treatment. Male sex and good performance status were independently associated with receiving the full course of treatment. Among patients who did receive a full course of treatment, half still had adjustments to their treatment schedule, which mainly included dose reductions due to side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with mBC starting first-line chemotherapy, only a small majority received the recommended number of cycles, and treatment adjustments were common. This suggests that adhering to recommended treatment is challenging, emphasizing the importance of integrating insights on treatment discontinuation and modifications into the shared decision-making process and guideline development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于转移性膀胱癌(mBC)患者来说,姑息化疗是主要的治疗方案之一。目前已有关于治疗效果的真实数据,但缺乏对具体治疗细节的全面概述,如接受化疗的周期数和(调整原因):方法:开展了一项基于人群的研究,研究对象包括 2016 年至 2021 年期间在荷兰确诊并开始化疗作为初始治疗的所有 mBC 患者。从荷兰癌症登记处收集了患者、肿瘤和治疗特征的数据,包括周期数、调整和调整原因以及生存率。对治疗模式和结果进行了描述性分析。采用逻辑回归分析确定与接受指南推荐的全部治疗(4-6个周期)相关的因素:结果:共有684名患者开始了一线化疗,其中大部分以卡铂为主(54%)。结果:共有 684 名患者开始了一线化疗,其中大部分是以卡铂为基础的化疗(54%)。在这些接受化疗的患者中在开始接受一线化疗的 mBC 患者中,只有一小部分人接受了推荐的周期数,而且调整治疗方案的情况很普遍。这表明坚持推荐的治疗具有挑战性,强调了在共同决策过程和指南制定中纳入有关治疗中止和调整的见解的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guidelines versus real-world data in metastatic bladder cancer: A population-based study on first-line chemotherapy treatment patterns.

Background: For patients with metastatic bladder cancer (mBC) palliative chemotherapy is one of the main treatment options. Real-world insights into outcomes are available, but a comprehensive overview of specific treatment details like number of chemotherapy cycles received and (reasons for) adjustments is lacking.

Methods: A population-based study was conducted, including all patients diagnosed with mBC in the Netherlands between 2016 and 2021 who started chemotherapy as initial treatment. Data on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, including number of cycles, adjustments and reasons for adjustments, and survival were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Treatment patterns and outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with receiving the full guideline-recommended treatment (4-6 cycles).

Results: A total of 684 patients started first-line chemotherapy, mostly carboplatin-based (54%). Of these patients, 35% did not receive the full course of treatment. Among these patients who received <4 cycles, 24% died within one month of stopping treatment. Male sex and good performance status were independently associated with receiving the full course of treatment. Among patients who did receive a full course of treatment, half still had adjustments to their treatment schedule, which mainly included dose reductions due to side effects.

Conclusions: Among patients with mBC starting first-line chemotherapy, only a small majority received the recommended number of cycles, and treatment adjustments were common. This suggests that adhering to recommended treatment is challenging, emphasizing the importance of integrating insights on treatment discontinuation and modifications into the shared decision-making process and guideline development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "A 2-center review of histopathology of variants of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and their impact on clinical outcomes" [Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations Volume 42 (2024) 333.e15-333.e20]. Laparoscopic suture-free partial nephrectomy using argon-beam-coagulator: Surgical technique and outcomes of a single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Editorial Board Table of Contents Cover 2 - Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1