Raphael William , Pierre-Yves McLaughlin , Mathieu Pharand-Charbonneau , Debbie Smith Wright , Alain Haddad , Marc Gaudet
{"title":"高剂量率近距离放射治疗作为社区癌症中心治疗低危和中危前列腺癌的单一疗法的长期无病生存率和与健康相关的生活质量结果。","authors":"Raphael William , Pierre-Yves McLaughlin , Mathieu Pharand-Charbonneau , Debbie Smith Wright , Alain Haddad , Marc Gaudet","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>To determine the long-term disease-free survival, long-term toxicity, and effect on health-related quality of life of a two-fraction regimen of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS AND MATERIALS</h3><div>Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with CT-planned HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy in two implants of 13.5 Gy in one community cancer center. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaires were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Biochemical recurrence (Phoenix definition) was evaluated to determine disease-free survival at 5 and 7 years. Proportion of patients in each IPSS category (mild = 0–7, moderate = 8–18, severe = 19+) was evaluated at each follow-up interval.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Thirty patients were accrued to the study between 2014 and 2016. Median prostate-specific antigen was 8,7 (range 4.1–17.5). T stages were T1c = 65%, T2a = 21%, and T2b = 14%. Twenty-seven percent of patients had a Gleason score of 6 and 73% had a Gleason score of 7. 13% were in low risk category and 87% in intermediate risk category. Median follow-up was 84 months. There were no deaths at 84 months after brachytherapy. Disease-free survival was 90% at 5 years and 86% at 7 years. Two patients experienced late Grade 3 GU toxicity (6.6%).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>This study serves as proof of concept that HDR monotherapy can be performed successfully with excellent long-term outcomes in a community cancer center with adequate training and experience. The long-term disease-free survival rate and the health-related quality of life seem acceptable as compared to other treatment modalities. Further study is ongoing with regard to the optimal dosing regimen for HDR monotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term disease-free survival and health-related quality of life results of high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated in a community cancer center\",\"authors\":\"Raphael William , Pierre-Yves McLaughlin , Mathieu Pharand-Charbonneau , Debbie Smith Wright , Alain Haddad , Marc Gaudet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>To determine the long-term disease-free survival, long-term toxicity, and effect on health-related quality of life of a two-fraction regimen of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS AND MATERIALS</h3><div>Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with CT-planned HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy in two implants of 13.5 Gy in one community cancer center. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaires were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Biochemical recurrence (Phoenix definition) was evaluated to determine disease-free survival at 5 and 7 years. Proportion of patients in each IPSS category (mild = 0–7, moderate = 8–18, severe = 19+) was evaluated at each follow-up interval.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Thirty patients were accrued to the study between 2014 and 2016. Median prostate-specific antigen was 8,7 (range 4.1–17.5). T stages were T1c = 65%, T2a = 21%, and T2b = 14%. Twenty-seven percent of patients had a Gleason score of 6 and 73% had a Gleason score of 7. 13% were in low risk category and 87% in intermediate risk category. Median follow-up was 84 months. There were no deaths at 84 months after brachytherapy. Disease-free survival was 90% at 5 years and 86% at 7 years. Two patients experienced late Grade 3 GU toxicity (6.6%).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>This study serves as proof of concept that HDR monotherapy can be performed successfully with excellent long-term outcomes in a community cancer center with adequate training and experience. The long-term disease-free survival rate and the health-related quality of life seem acceptable as compared to other treatment modalities. Further study is ongoing with regard to the optimal dosing regimen for HDR monotherapy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 54-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472124004057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472124004057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term disease-free survival and health-related quality of life results of high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated in a community cancer center
PURPOSE
To determine the long-term disease-free survival, long-term toxicity, and effect on health-related quality of life of a two-fraction regimen of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with CT-planned HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy in two implants of 13.5 Gy in one community cancer center. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaires were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Biochemical recurrence (Phoenix definition) was evaluated to determine disease-free survival at 5 and 7 years. Proportion of patients in each IPSS category (mild = 0–7, moderate = 8–18, severe = 19+) was evaluated at each follow-up interval.
RESULTS
Thirty patients were accrued to the study between 2014 and 2016. Median prostate-specific antigen was 8,7 (range 4.1–17.5). T stages were T1c = 65%, T2a = 21%, and T2b = 14%. Twenty-seven percent of patients had a Gleason score of 6 and 73% had a Gleason score of 7. 13% were in low risk category and 87% in intermediate risk category. Median follow-up was 84 months. There were no deaths at 84 months after brachytherapy. Disease-free survival was 90% at 5 years and 86% at 7 years. Two patients experienced late Grade 3 GU toxicity (6.6%).
CONCLUSIONS
This study serves as proof of concept that HDR monotherapy can be performed successfully with excellent long-term outcomes in a community cancer center with adequate training and experience. The long-term disease-free survival rate and the health-related quality of life seem acceptable as compared to other treatment modalities. Further study is ongoing with regard to the optimal dosing regimen for HDR monotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Brachytherapy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original peer-reviewed articles and selected reviews on the techniques and clinical applications of interstitial and intracavitary radiation in the management of cancers. Laboratory and experimental research relevant to clinical practice is also included. Related disciplines include medical physics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology and radiology. Brachytherapy publishes technical advances, original articles, reviews, and point/counterpoint on controversial issues. Original articles that address any aspect of brachytherapy are invited. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.