猫咪万岁美国得克萨斯州计划重新引入的猫鼬种群的生存能力

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70044
Lindsay A. Martinez, Jason V. Lombardi, Israel D. Parker, Forrest East, Tyler A. Campbell, Roel R. Lopez
{"title":"猫咪万岁美国得克萨斯州计划重新引入的猫鼬种群的生存能力","authors":"Lindsay A. Martinez,&nbsp;Jason V. Lombardi,&nbsp;Israel D. Parker,&nbsp;Forrest East,&nbsp;Tyler A. Campbell,&nbsp;Roel R. Lopez","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reintroductions are often needed to recover carnivore populations and restore ecological processes. Felids are common subjects of reintroduction efforts, but published population models informing felid reintroduction plans are uncommon, and poor planning has sometimes caused issues in felid reintroduction programs. In the United States, ocelots (<i>Leopardus pardalis pardalis</i>) are classified as endangered, and recovery requires population expansion into historic habitat. A multi-organization effort is underway to establish a new ocelot population in Texas by releasing ocelots into an area of 478 km<sup>2</sup> of suitable habitat in ocelots' historic but now unoccupied range. In this study, we used population viability analyses to compare different ocelot reintroduction strategies for the identified reintroduction area. Based on a potential ocelot breeding program's limitations, we modeled reintroduction using a founding population of no more than six ocelots and no more than four ocelots released per year for no more than 15 subsequent years. Within these limitations, we assessed projected population abundances and extinction risks after 30 years for 20 different reintroduction strategies. We found that long-term releases are necessary to establish a viable population; under conservative model assumptions, releasing six ocelots in the initial year and then releasing four individuals annually for an additional 10–15 years is necessary for attaining a projected population greater than 36.62 ocelots (baseline) with &lt;6% extinction risk. We also found that ocelot population abundance is about equally sensitive to post-release mortality and inbreeding depression. This highlights the importance of not only supporting reintroduced ocelots' survival but also managing for high genetic diversity in the reintroduction program. Further, we found that realistic but more liberal assumptions on the carrying capacity of the reintroduction area and the age of first reproduction for ocelots increase projected population abundances (53.95 individuals and 61.26 individuals, respectively), and thus reintroduction success. The model's sensitivity to carrying capacity suggests that long-term habitat protection and expansion are among the most important management actions to support ocelot reintroduction. Our study establishes the first population viability model for an ocelot reintroduction plan anywhere across the species' wide geographic range, and it reinforces several key considerations for wildlife reintroduction efforts worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long live the cat: Ocelot population viability in a planned reintroduced population in Texas, USA\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay A. Martinez,&nbsp;Jason V. Lombardi,&nbsp;Israel D. Parker,&nbsp;Forrest East,&nbsp;Tyler A. Campbell,&nbsp;Roel R. Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Reintroductions are often needed to recover carnivore populations and restore ecological processes. Felids are common subjects of reintroduction efforts, but published population models informing felid reintroduction plans are uncommon, and poor planning has sometimes caused issues in felid reintroduction programs. In the United States, ocelots (<i>Leopardus pardalis pardalis</i>) are classified as endangered, and recovery requires population expansion into historic habitat. A multi-organization effort is underway to establish a new ocelot population in Texas by releasing ocelots into an area of 478 km<sup>2</sup> of suitable habitat in ocelots' historic but now unoccupied range. In this study, we used population viability analyses to compare different ocelot reintroduction strategies for the identified reintroduction area. Based on a potential ocelot breeding program's limitations, we modeled reintroduction using a founding population of no more than six ocelots and no more than four ocelots released per year for no more than 15 subsequent years. Within these limitations, we assessed projected population abundances and extinction risks after 30 years for 20 different reintroduction strategies. We found that long-term releases are necessary to establish a viable population; under conservative model assumptions, releasing six ocelots in the initial year and then releasing four individuals annually for an additional 10–15 years is necessary for attaining a projected population greater than 36.62 ocelots (baseline) with &lt;6% extinction risk. We also found that ocelot population abundance is about equally sensitive to post-release mortality and inbreeding depression. This highlights the importance of not only supporting reintroduced ocelots' survival but also managing for high genetic diversity in the reintroduction program. Further, we found that realistic but more liberal assumptions on the carrying capacity of the reintroduction area and the age of first reproduction for ocelots increase projected population abundances (53.95 individuals and 61.26 individuals, respectively), and thus reintroduction success. The model's sensitivity to carrying capacity suggests that long-term habitat protection and expansion are among the most important management actions to support ocelot reintroduction. Our study establishes the first population viability model for an ocelot reintroduction plan anywhere across the species' wide geographic range, and it reinforces several key considerations for wildlife reintroduction efforts worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70044\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了恢复食肉动物种群和恢复生态过程,通常需要进行重引入。猫科动物是重引进工作的常见对象,但已公布的猫科动物重引进计划种群模型并不常见,规划不当有时会给猫科动物重引进计划带来问题。在美国,猫鼬(Leopardus pardalis pardalis)被列为濒危物种,其恢复需要将种群扩大到历史栖息地。目前,多方正在努力在得克萨斯州建立一个新的猫鼬种群,将猫鼬放归到猫鼬的历史栖息地,该栖息地面积为 478 平方公里,是猫鼬的历史栖息地,但现在已无人居住。在这项研究中,我们使用种群生存力分析方法,比较了在已确定的重引进区内不同的猫鼬重引进策略。基于潜在的猫鼬繁殖计划的局限性,我们模拟了一个不超过 6 只猫鼬的初始种群以及在随后不超过 15 年的时间里每年释放不超过 4 只猫鼬的重引入模式。在这些限制条件下,我们评估了 20 种不同的重引入策略在 30 年后的预计种群数量和灭绝风险。我们发现,长期放归是建立一个可生存种群的必要条件;在保守的模型假设下,第一年放归六只猫鼬,然后在接下来的 10-15 年中每年放归四只猫鼬,预计种群数量将超过 36.62 只猫鼬(基线),灭绝风险为 6%。我们还发现,猫鼬种群丰度对释放后死亡率和近亲繁殖抑制的敏感度大致相同。这凸显了不仅要支持重新引入的猫鼬的生存,还要在重新引入计划中管理高遗传多样性的重要性。此外,我们还发现,对重新引入地区的承载能力和猫鼬首次繁殖年龄的假设虽然现实,但却更宽松,这增加了预计的种群丰度(分别为 53.95 头和 61.26 头),从而提高了重新引入的成功率。该模型对承载能力的敏感性表明,长期的栖息地保护和扩展是支持猫鼬再引入的最重要的管理措施之一。我们的研究首次为猫鼬重引入计划建立了一个种群生存能力模型,该模型适用于猫鼬广泛分布的任何地方,并加强了全球野生动物重引入工作的几个关键考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long live the cat: Ocelot population viability in a planned reintroduced population in Texas, USA

Reintroductions are often needed to recover carnivore populations and restore ecological processes. Felids are common subjects of reintroduction efforts, but published population models informing felid reintroduction plans are uncommon, and poor planning has sometimes caused issues in felid reintroduction programs. In the United States, ocelots (Leopardus pardalis pardalis) are classified as endangered, and recovery requires population expansion into historic habitat. A multi-organization effort is underway to establish a new ocelot population in Texas by releasing ocelots into an area of 478 km2 of suitable habitat in ocelots' historic but now unoccupied range. In this study, we used population viability analyses to compare different ocelot reintroduction strategies for the identified reintroduction area. Based on a potential ocelot breeding program's limitations, we modeled reintroduction using a founding population of no more than six ocelots and no more than four ocelots released per year for no more than 15 subsequent years. Within these limitations, we assessed projected population abundances and extinction risks after 30 years for 20 different reintroduction strategies. We found that long-term releases are necessary to establish a viable population; under conservative model assumptions, releasing six ocelots in the initial year and then releasing four individuals annually for an additional 10–15 years is necessary for attaining a projected population greater than 36.62 ocelots (baseline) with <6% extinction risk. We also found that ocelot population abundance is about equally sensitive to post-release mortality and inbreeding depression. This highlights the importance of not only supporting reintroduced ocelots' survival but also managing for high genetic diversity in the reintroduction program. Further, we found that realistic but more liberal assumptions on the carrying capacity of the reintroduction area and the age of first reproduction for ocelots increase projected population abundances (53.95 individuals and 61.26 individuals, respectively), and thus reintroduction success. The model's sensitivity to carrying capacity suggests that long-term habitat protection and expansion are among the most important management actions to support ocelot reintroduction. Our study establishes the first population viability model for an ocelot reintroduction plan anywhere across the species' wide geographic range, and it reinforces several key considerations for wildlife reintroduction efforts worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
Variation in habitat selection among individuals differs by maternal status for moose in a region with low calf survival Variation in forest patch habitat quality for white-footed mice driven by invasive plants in an urbanizing landscape Landscape use by prey: Bottom-up regulation prevails under reduced predation risk Understanding the effects of livestock grazing on dryland plant communities within the context of abiotic variability Full life cycle assessment of insect biomass allows estimation of bioflows across water, air, and land
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1