在非生物多变性背景下了解牲畜放牧对旱地植物群落的影响

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70059
Scott M. Carpenter, Ingrid C. Burke, William K. Lauenroth
{"title":"在非生物多变性背景下了解牲畜放牧对旱地植物群落的影响","authors":"Scott M. Carpenter,&nbsp;Ingrid C. Burke,&nbsp;William K. Lauenroth","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drylands, which cover more than 40% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, face rising agricultural demand and the influence of climate change. Understanding how livestock grazing pressure and local climate affect these environments is pivotal for informed land management. We studied big sagebrush plant communities in southwestern Wyoming over grazing gradients created by artificial livestock watering points. To explore the role of abiotic factors in shaping plant community response to grazing, we assessed the response of plant functional groups to grazing while accounting for soil texture variability across a precipitation gradient. Our models estimated that sagebrush cover responded positively to grazing intensity, with a 6% increase in cover with intensity when comparing the heaviest grazing treatment with the lowest grazing intensity. Perennial bunchgrass cover, the primary forage component, had a small negative response, a 3% decrease in cover from the lowest grazing intensity to the highest. Grazing intensity had no effect on bunchgrass density, perennial forbs, or rhizomatous grasses. Compared with abiotic factors, grazing intensity had a small effect on perennial bunchgrass and bare ground. We found that precipitation explained a 13% increase in perennial bunchgrass cover and a 34% decrease in bare ground cover compared with a 6% increase with increasing intensity across our grazing gradients. Sand content also had a larger effect on perennial bunchgrass cover and density than grazing. Increased sand content was associated with increased bunchgrass cover and density, supporting the inverse texture hypothesis. Our results show that while livestock grazing impacts sagebrush plant communities, its effect is small when compared with the effects of climate and soil. Our study contributes to a growing body of research emphasizing the need to contextualize plant community responses to grazing within specific climatic and edaphic conditions, which will promote effective land management in dryland ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the effects of livestock grazing on dryland plant communities within the context of abiotic variability\",\"authors\":\"Scott M. Carpenter,&nbsp;Ingrid C. Burke,&nbsp;William K. Lauenroth\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Drylands, which cover more than 40% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, face rising agricultural demand and the influence of climate change. Understanding how livestock grazing pressure and local climate affect these environments is pivotal for informed land management. We studied big sagebrush plant communities in southwestern Wyoming over grazing gradients created by artificial livestock watering points. To explore the role of abiotic factors in shaping plant community response to grazing, we assessed the response of plant functional groups to grazing while accounting for soil texture variability across a precipitation gradient. Our models estimated that sagebrush cover responded positively to grazing intensity, with a 6% increase in cover with intensity when comparing the heaviest grazing treatment with the lowest grazing intensity. Perennial bunchgrass cover, the primary forage component, had a small negative response, a 3% decrease in cover from the lowest grazing intensity to the highest. Grazing intensity had no effect on bunchgrass density, perennial forbs, or rhizomatous grasses. Compared with abiotic factors, grazing intensity had a small effect on perennial bunchgrass and bare ground. We found that precipitation explained a 13% increase in perennial bunchgrass cover and a 34% decrease in bare ground cover compared with a 6% increase with increasing intensity across our grazing gradients. Sand content also had a larger effect on perennial bunchgrass cover and density than grazing. Increased sand content was associated with increased bunchgrass cover and density, supporting the inverse texture hypothesis. Our results show that while livestock grazing impacts sagebrush plant communities, its effect is small when compared with the effects of climate and soil. Our study contributes to a growing body of research emphasizing the need to contextualize plant community responses to grazing within specific climatic and edaphic conditions, which will promote effective land management in dryland ecosystems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70059\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70059\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旱地覆盖了地球陆地表面的 40% 以上,面临着不断增长的农业需求和气候变化的影响。了解牲畜放牧压力和当地气候如何影响这些环境,对于明智的土地管理至关重要。我们研究了怀俄明州西南部由人工牲畜饮水点形成的放牧梯度上的大沙棘灌木植物群落。为了探索非生物因素在植物群落对放牧的反应中的作用,我们评估了植物功能群对放牧的反应,同时考虑了降水梯度上的土壤质地变化。据我们的模型估计,鼠尾草覆盖率对放牧强度呈正向响应,在将放牧强度最大的处理与放牧强度最小的处理进行比较时,覆盖率随放牧强度的增加而增加 6%。作为主要牧草成分的多年生丛生草盖度出现了轻微的负面反应,从最低放牧强度到最高放牧强度,盖度下降了 3%。放牧强度对束草密度、多年生草本植物或根瘤禾本科植物没有影响。与非生物因素相比,放牧强度对多年生束草和裸地的影响较小。我们发现,降水可解释多年生丛生草覆盖率增加 13% 和裸地覆盖率减少 34% 的原因,而随着放牧强度的增加,降水可解释多年生丛生草覆盖率增加 6% 的原因。与放牧相比,含沙量对多年生丛草覆盖度和密度的影响也更大。含沙量的增加与丛草盖度和密度的增加有关,这支持了反向质地假说。我们的研究结果表明,虽然放牧会影响鼠尾草植物群落,但与气候和土壤的影响相比,其影响很小。我们的研究为越来越多的研究做出了贡献,这些研究强调了在特定的气候和土壤条件下植物群落对放牧的反应,这将促进旱地生态系统的有效土地管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the effects of livestock grazing on dryland plant communities within the context of abiotic variability

Drylands, which cover more than 40% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, face rising agricultural demand and the influence of climate change. Understanding how livestock grazing pressure and local climate affect these environments is pivotal for informed land management. We studied big sagebrush plant communities in southwestern Wyoming over grazing gradients created by artificial livestock watering points. To explore the role of abiotic factors in shaping plant community response to grazing, we assessed the response of plant functional groups to grazing while accounting for soil texture variability across a precipitation gradient. Our models estimated that sagebrush cover responded positively to grazing intensity, with a 6% increase in cover with intensity when comparing the heaviest grazing treatment with the lowest grazing intensity. Perennial bunchgrass cover, the primary forage component, had a small negative response, a 3% decrease in cover from the lowest grazing intensity to the highest. Grazing intensity had no effect on bunchgrass density, perennial forbs, or rhizomatous grasses. Compared with abiotic factors, grazing intensity had a small effect on perennial bunchgrass and bare ground. We found that precipitation explained a 13% increase in perennial bunchgrass cover and a 34% decrease in bare ground cover compared with a 6% increase with increasing intensity across our grazing gradients. Sand content also had a larger effect on perennial bunchgrass cover and density than grazing. Increased sand content was associated with increased bunchgrass cover and density, supporting the inverse texture hypothesis. Our results show that while livestock grazing impacts sagebrush plant communities, its effect is small when compared with the effects of climate and soil. Our study contributes to a growing body of research emphasizing the need to contextualize plant community responses to grazing within specific climatic and edaphic conditions, which will promote effective land management in dryland ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
How often are ecosystems top-down controlled? Experiments in grassland, grasshopper, and bird systems over time and space Agricultural mosaics offer nesting habitat to dabbling ducks in the arid Intermountain West of the United States Daily and seasonal variations of soil respiration from maize field under different water treatments in North China Tree damage risk across gradients in tree species richness and stand age: Implications for adaptive forest management Forest disturbance shapes habitat selection but not migratory tendency for partially migratory ungulates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1