调查临床护士对患者的隐喻和概念中的性别陈规定型观念

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1155/2024/8861439
Selver Bezgin, Özge Odabaşı Koç
{"title":"调查临床护士对患者的隐喻和概念中的性别陈规定型观念","authors":"Selver Bezgin,&nbsp;Özge Odabaşı Koç","doi":"10.1155/2024/8861439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> The present study aims to analyze the presence of gender stereotypes in the metaphors nurse clinicians use to describe their patients.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> This study was conducted with 149 nurse clinicians working at a university hospital. Data were collected using a metaphor survey.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The most common metaphors for female patients were “flower” (f: 23) and “mother/my mother” (f: 8), whereas the most common metaphors for male patients were “wood” (f: 10) and “cactus” (f: 7). These metaphors were more frequently produced by female nurses. Female patients were often described as “delicate, in need of attention and help, and fragile,” while male patients were described as “strong, authoritative, head of the family, and tough.” Female nurses likened a more delicate male patient to a “delicate woman,” and male nurses likened the strength of a male patient to a “man.” Furthermore, eight nurses, five male nurses and three female nurses, frequently used the metaphor of “patient” (f: 6) while stating that they did not view patients as female or male. Male nurses (f: 4) produced the metaphor of “patient” (f: 6) the most.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> It is important not to overlook the factors underlying the metaphors produced by nurse clinicians. In this regard, extensive studies are needed to take into account additional factors such as cultural background, experience, or specific patient interactions that may have a major impact on how nurses perceive gender.</p>\n <p><b>Implications for Nursing Management:</b> This study evaluates nurse clinicians’ perceptions of patients in the context of gender stereotypes and highlights some important points in terms of nursing and patient care.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8861439","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Gender Stereotypes in Nurse Clinicians’ Metaphors and Concepts of Patients\",\"authors\":\"Selver Bezgin,&nbsp;Özge Odabaşı Koç\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/8861439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Aim:</b> The present study aims to analyze the presence of gender stereotypes in the metaphors nurse clinicians use to describe their patients.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> This study was conducted with 149 nurse clinicians working at a university hospital. Data were collected using a metaphor survey.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> The most common metaphors for female patients were “flower” (f: 23) and “mother/my mother” (f: 8), whereas the most common metaphors for male patients were “wood” (f: 10) and “cactus” (f: 7). These metaphors were more frequently produced by female nurses. Female patients were often described as “delicate, in need of attention and help, and fragile,” while male patients were described as “strong, authoritative, head of the family, and tough.” Female nurses likened a more delicate male patient to a “delicate woman,” and male nurses likened the strength of a male patient to a “man.” Furthermore, eight nurses, five male nurses and three female nurses, frequently used the metaphor of “patient” (f: 6) while stating that they did not view patients as female or male. Male nurses (f: 4) produced the metaphor of “patient” (f: 6) the most.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> It is important not to overlook the factors underlying the metaphors produced by nurse clinicians. In this regard, extensive studies are needed to take into account additional factors such as cultural background, experience, or specific patient interactions that may have a major impact on how nurses perceive gender.</p>\\n <p><b>Implications for Nursing Management:</b> This study evaluates nurse clinicians’ perceptions of patients in the context of gender stereotypes and highlights some important points in terms of nursing and patient care.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8861439\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8861439\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8861439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在分析临床护士在描述病人时使用的隐喻中是否存在性别刻板印象。 研究方法本研究的对象是在一所大学医院工作的 149 名临床护士。通过隐喻调查收集数据。 结果对女性患者最常见的隐喻是 "花"(23 个)和 "母亲/我的母亲"(8 个),而对男性患者最常见的隐喻是 "木头"(10 个)和 "仙人掌"(7 个)。女护士更常使用这些比喻。女病人通常被描述为 "娇弱、需要关注和帮助、脆弱",而男病人则被描述为 "强壮、有权威、一家之主、坚强"。女护士把比较娇弱的男病人比作 "娇弱的女人",而男护士则把强壮的男病人比作 "男人"。此外,8 名护士(5 名男护士和 3 名女护士)经常使用 "病人 "这一隐喻(f: 6),同时表示她们并不把病人视为女性或男性。男护士(4 人)使用 "病人"(6 人)的隐喻最多。 结论重要的是不要忽视临床护士产生隐喻的潜在因素。在这方面,需要进行广泛的研究,以考虑到其他因素,如文化背景、经验或特定的患者互动,这些因素可能会对护士如何看待性别问题产生重大影响。 对护理管理的意义:本研究评估了临床护士在性别刻板印象背景下对病人的看法,并强调了护理和病人护理方面的一些要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of Gender Stereotypes in Nurse Clinicians’ Metaphors and Concepts of Patients

Aim: The present study aims to analyze the presence of gender stereotypes in the metaphors nurse clinicians use to describe their patients.

Methods: This study was conducted with 149 nurse clinicians working at a university hospital. Data were collected using a metaphor survey.

Results: The most common metaphors for female patients were “flower” (f: 23) and “mother/my mother” (f: 8), whereas the most common metaphors for male patients were “wood” (f: 10) and “cactus” (f: 7). These metaphors were more frequently produced by female nurses. Female patients were often described as “delicate, in need of attention and help, and fragile,” while male patients were described as “strong, authoritative, head of the family, and tough.” Female nurses likened a more delicate male patient to a “delicate woman,” and male nurses likened the strength of a male patient to a “man.” Furthermore, eight nurses, five male nurses and three female nurses, frequently used the metaphor of “patient” (f: 6) while stating that they did not view patients as female or male. Male nurses (f: 4) produced the metaphor of “patient” (f: 6) the most.

Conclusion: It is important not to overlook the factors underlying the metaphors produced by nurse clinicians. In this regard, extensive studies are needed to take into account additional factors such as cultural background, experience, or specific patient interactions that may have a major impact on how nurses perceive gender.

Implications for Nursing Management: This study evaluates nurse clinicians’ perceptions of patients in the context of gender stereotypes and highlights some important points in terms of nursing and patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
Effects of Hierarchical Unit Culture and Power Distance Orientation on Nurses’ Silence Behavior: The Roles of Perceived Futility and Hospital Management Support for Patient Safety Nurse-Led Telephone Program for Nonadherent to Treatment Type 2 Diabetics With Comorbid Depression: A Cost-Consequence and Budget Impact Analysis Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Organizational Learning Instrument–Development Stages (OLI-DS) Instrument in Hospital Units A Salutogenic Perspective on Critical Care Nurse’s Experiences of Supervising Nurses Without Training in Intensive Care to Comprehend, Manage, and Feel Meaning During a Crisis The Impact of Perceived Emotional Intelligence on Occupational Stress Among Nurses: Empirical Evidence From a Saudi Health Cluster
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1