Wendy Jo Svetanoff, Shruthi Srinivas, Kristine Griffin, Karen A Diefenbach, Ihab Halaweish, Richard Wood, Alessandra Gasior
{"title":"腹腔镜盲肠造口术用于小儿逆行灌肠通路。","authors":"Wendy Jo Svetanoff, Shruthi Srinivas, Kristine Griffin, Karen A Diefenbach, Ihab Halaweish, Richard Wood, Alessandra Gasior","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Use of the appendix for an antegrade continence enema (ACE) is not always possible. Various methods exist for creating cecostomy tubes, including percutaneous, endoscopic, or surgical placement. We describe our laparoscopic cecostomy technique and review short- and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single institution retrospective review of children who underwent laparoscopic cecostomy placement from June 2016-June 2023. The cecum is secured to the abdominal wall with trans-fascial sutures and placement of an enterostomy button under direct vision. Half-volume flushes begin after 48 h; after two weeks, patients transition to full flushes. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients were included [24 (60 %) female; 31 (77.5 %) Caucasian]. Twenty-one (52.5 %) had myelomeningocele, 15 (37.5 %) had an anorectal malformation and 4 (10 %) had functional constipation. Twenty-five (62.5 %) underwent laparoscopic cecostomy placement alone, while 15 (37.5 %) had it performed with another procedure. Median operative time was 1.12 (IQR 0:93-1.45) hours for isolated cecostomy placement, with median post-operative stay of 2.0 days (2.2-3.1) days. Post-operatively, one patient had severe withholding, ultimately requiring a diverting ileostomy. No other 30-day complications (surgical site infection, tube removal) were identified. One patient required revision four months post-op due to inadvertent placement in the sigmoid. At one-year follow-up, 11/36 (30.6 %) children noted granulation tissue, and 11 (30.6 %) noted superficial leakage. Two (6 %) patients had transitioned to oral laxatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic cecostomy tube placement is a safe and alternative method of developing ACE access that can be done concurrently with other procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"162053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic Cecostomy Placement for Antegrade Enema Access in the Pediatric Population.\",\"authors\":\"Wendy Jo Svetanoff, Shruthi Srinivas, Kristine Griffin, Karen A Diefenbach, Ihab Halaweish, Richard Wood, Alessandra Gasior\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Use of the appendix for an antegrade continence enema (ACE) is not always possible. Various methods exist for creating cecostomy tubes, including percutaneous, endoscopic, or surgical placement. We describe our laparoscopic cecostomy technique and review short- and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single institution retrospective review of children who underwent laparoscopic cecostomy placement from June 2016-June 2023. The cecum is secured to the abdominal wall with trans-fascial sutures and placement of an enterostomy button under direct vision. Half-volume flushes begin after 48 h; after two weeks, patients transition to full flushes. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients were included [24 (60 %) female; 31 (77.5 %) Caucasian]. Twenty-one (52.5 %) had myelomeningocele, 15 (37.5 %) had an anorectal malformation and 4 (10 %) had functional constipation. Twenty-five (62.5 %) underwent laparoscopic cecostomy placement alone, while 15 (37.5 %) had it performed with another procedure. Median operative time was 1.12 (IQR 0:93-1.45) hours for isolated cecostomy placement, with median post-operative stay of 2.0 days (2.2-3.1) days. Post-operatively, one patient had severe withholding, ultimately requiring a diverting ileostomy. No other 30-day complications (surgical site infection, tube removal) were identified. One patient required revision four months post-op due to inadvertent placement in the sigmoid. At one-year follow-up, 11/36 (30.6 %) children noted granulation tissue, and 11 (30.6 %) noted superficial leakage. Two (6 %) patients had transitioned to oral laxatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic cecostomy tube placement is a safe and alternative method of developing ACE access that can be done concurrently with other procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"162053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162053\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laparoscopic Cecostomy Placement for Antegrade Enema Access in the Pediatric Population.
Aim: Use of the appendix for an antegrade continence enema (ACE) is not always possible. Various methods exist for creating cecostomy tubes, including percutaneous, endoscopic, or surgical placement. We describe our laparoscopic cecostomy technique and review short- and long-term outcomes.
Methods: Single institution retrospective review of children who underwent laparoscopic cecostomy placement from June 2016-June 2023. The cecum is secured to the abdominal wall with trans-fascial sutures and placement of an enterostomy button under direct vision. Half-volume flushes begin after 48 h; after two weeks, patients transition to full flushes. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed.
Results: Forty patients were included [24 (60 %) female; 31 (77.5 %) Caucasian]. Twenty-one (52.5 %) had myelomeningocele, 15 (37.5 %) had an anorectal malformation and 4 (10 %) had functional constipation. Twenty-five (62.5 %) underwent laparoscopic cecostomy placement alone, while 15 (37.5 %) had it performed with another procedure. Median operative time was 1.12 (IQR 0:93-1.45) hours for isolated cecostomy placement, with median post-operative stay of 2.0 days (2.2-3.1) days. Post-operatively, one patient had severe withholding, ultimately requiring a diverting ileostomy. No other 30-day complications (surgical site infection, tube removal) were identified. One patient required revision four months post-op due to inadvertent placement in the sigmoid. At one-year follow-up, 11/36 (30.6 %) children noted granulation tissue, and 11 (30.6 %) noted superficial leakage. Two (6 %) patients had transitioned to oral laxatives.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic cecostomy tube placement is a safe and alternative method of developing ACE access that can be done concurrently with other procedures.
期刊介绍:
The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.