中国成人高血压患者非传统血脂谱与 2 型糖尿病风险之间的关系:中国高血压登记研究的发现。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1111/jch.14927
Yu Tao, Tao Wang, Wei Zhou, Lingjuan Zhu, Chao Yu, Juxiang Li, Huihui Bao, Xiaoshu Cheng
{"title":"中国成人高血压患者非传统血脂谱与 2 型糖尿病风险之间的关系:中国高血压登记研究的发现。","authors":"Yu Tao, Tao Wang, Wei Zhou, Lingjuan Zhu, Chao Yu, Juxiang Li, Huihui Bao, Xiaoshu Cheng","doi":"10.1111/jch.14927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between nontraditional lipid profiles and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains ambiguous within the hypertension population. The objective of this study is to examine the association between nontraditional lipid profiles and T2DM in Chinese adults with hypertension. The current investigation encompassed 13 728 participants with hypertension from the China Hypertension Registry Study. Logistic regression analysis and smooth curve fitting were employed to evaluate the association between nontraditional lipid profiles and T2DM. The prevalence of T2DM was found to be 17.8%. In the fully adjusted model, atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) exhibited the highest odds ratios (ORs) for T2DM (OR: 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.26-3.26). Conversely, the fully adjusted ORs (95% CI) for total cholesterol (TC)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)/HDL-C, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) were 1.33 (1.25-1.41), 1.40 (1.29-1.51), and 1.41 (1.34-1.49), respectively. Additionally, the study demonstrated that AIP had a superior ability to identify T2DM. Subgroup analyses indicated that the relationship between AIP and Non-HDL-C with T2DM was more significant in the lighter weight population. In addition, the association of TC/HDL-C with LDL-C/HDL-C with T2DM was stronger in the lower homocysteine level population. Among the southern Chinese population with hypertension, all nontraditional lipid indices positively correlated with the risk of T2DM. Among these lipid indices, AIP exhibited superior discriminatory power in identifying T2DM compared to TC/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C. Trial Registration: ChiCTR1800017274.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Nontraditional Lipid Profiles and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Adults With Hypertension: Findings From the China Hypertension Registry Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Tao, Tao Wang, Wei Zhou, Lingjuan Zhu, Chao Yu, Juxiang Li, Huihui Bao, Xiaoshu Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.14927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relationship between nontraditional lipid profiles and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains ambiguous within the hypertension population. The objective of this study is to examine the association between nontraditional lipid profiles and T2DM in Chinese adults with hypertension. The current investigation encompassed 13 728 participants with hypertension from the China Hypertension Registry Study. Logistic regression analysis and smooth curve fitting were employed to evaluate the association between nontraditional lipid profiles and T2DM. The prevalence of T2DM was found to be 17.8%. In the fully adjusted model, atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) exhibited the highest odds ratios (ORs) for T2DM (OR: 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.26-3.26). Conversely, the fully adjusted ORs (95% CI) for total cholesterol (TC)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)/HDL-C, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) were 1.33 (1.25-1.41), 1.40 (1.29-1.51), and 1.41 (1.34-1.49), respectively. Additionally, the study demonstrated that AIP had a superior ability to identify T2DM. Subgroup analyses indicated that the relationship between AIP and Non-HDL-C with T2DM was more significant in the lighter weight population. In addition, the association of TC/HDL-C with LDL-C/HDL-C with T2DM was stronger in the lower homocysteine level population. Among the southern Chinese population with hypertension, all nontraditional lipid indices positively correlated with the risk of T2DM. Among these lipid indices, AIP exhibited superior discriminatory power in identifying T2DM compared to TC/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C. Trial Registration: ChiCTR1800017274.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14927\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在高血压人群中,非传统血脂特征与 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)之间的关系仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨中国成人高血压患者非传统血脂特征与 T2DM 之间的关系。本次调查涵盖了中国高血压登记研究的 13 728 名高血压患者。研究采用逻辑回归分析和平滑曲线拟合来评估非传统血脂特征与 T2DM 的关系。结果发现,T2DM 的患病率为 17.8%。在完全调整模型中,血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)与 T2DM 的几率比(ORs)最高(OR:2.71,95% 置信区间[CI]:2.26-3.26)。相反,总胆固醇(TC)/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)/HDL-C 和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(Non-HDL-C)的完全调整 ORs(95% CI)分别为 1.33(1.25-1.41)、1.40(1.29-1.51)和 1.41(1.34-1.49)。此外,该研究还表明,AIP 对 T2DM 的识别能力更强。亚组分析表明,在体重较轻的人群中,AIP 和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇与 T2DM 的关系更为显著。此外,在同型半胱氨酸水平较低的人群中,TC/HDL-C 与 LDL-C/HDL-C 与 T2DM 的关系更为密切。在中国南方高血压人群中,所有非传统血脂指数均与 T2DM 风险呈正相关。在这些血脂指标中,AIP与TC/HDL-C、LDL-C/HDL-C相比,在识别T2DM方面表现出更强的鉴别力。试验注册:ChiCTR1800017274。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Nontraditional Lipid Profiles and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Adults With Hypertension: Findings From the China Hypertension Registry Study.

The relationship between nontraditional lipid profiles and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains ambiguous within the hypertension population. The objective of this study is to examine the association between nontraditional lipid profiles and T2DM in Chinese adults with hypertension. The current investigation encompassed 13 728 participants with hypertension from the China Hypertension Registry Study. Logistic regression analysis and smooth curve fitting were employed to evaluate the association between nontraditional lipid profiles and T2DM. The prevalence of T2DM was found to be 17.8%. In the fully adjusted model, atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) exhibited the highest odds ratios (ORs) for T2DM (OR: 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.26-3.26). Conversely, the fully adjusted ORs (95% CI) for total cholesterol (TC)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)/HDL-C, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) were 1.33 (1.25-1.41), 1.40 (1.29-1.51), and 1.41 (1.34-1.49), respectively. Additionally, the study demonstrated that AIP had a superior ability to identify T2DM. Subgroup analyses indicated that the relationship between AIP and Non-HDL-C with T2DM was more significant in the lighter weight population. In addition, the association of TC/HDL-C with LDL-C/HDL-C with T2DM was stronger in the lower homocysteine level population. Among the southern Chinese population with hypertension, all nontraditional lipid indices positively correlated with the risk of T2DM. Among these lipid indices, AIP exhibited superior discriminatory power in identifying T2DM compared to TC/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C. Trial Registration: ChiCTR1800017274.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Mediterranean Diet Adherence on the Incidence of New-Onset Hypertension in Adults With Obesity in Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Rationale and Design of a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study of Esaxerenone Versus Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Older Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension on Calcium Channel Blocker Monotherapy (ESCORT-HT). Renal Denervation: New Evidence Supporting Long-Term Efficacy, Alternative Access Routes, and Cost-Effectiveness. Obesity, aldosterone excess, and mineralocorticoid receptor activation: Parallel or intersected circumstances? Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Arterial Hypertension: 10-Year Real-World Follow-Up Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1