Martin Tøffner Pedersen, Helle Bach-Hansen, Kristina Fruerlund Rasmussen, Mark H Yazer, Ulrik Sprogøe
{"title":"输血医学工作中试剂干扰的一个不寻常病例:由商用生理盐水引起的泛反应间接抗球蛋白试验。","authors":"Martin Tøffner Pedersen, Helle Bach-Hansen, Kristina Fruerlund Rasmussen, Mark H Yazer, Ulrik Sprogøe","doi":"10.1111/tme.13113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At the regional transfusion service in the Region of Southern Denmark, serological investigations are primarily carried out using column agglutination techniques. This case study examines an unusual instance of reagent interference in pretransfusion testing using column agglutination at the Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 72-year-old male patient presented for pretransfusion testing prior to hernia surgery. He typed as O RhD negative without discrepancies, but the antibody screen showed weakly positive reactions. Routine investigations showed discrepancies, leading to further investigations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Various serological tests were performed using in-house and commercial red test cells suspended in different suspension media and with different column agglutination cards and cassettes. Further investigations included washing of test cells, testing alternative saline solutions, varying incubation temperatures, testing without antihuman-globulin, and applying proteolytic enzymes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reactivity was present with red cells suspended in ID-CellStab (BioRad) but not in Red Cell Diluent (Quidel-Ortho). Reactivity was abolished by using trypsin-treated cells, indicating either the presence of an antibody reacting with-or unspecific agglutination depending on-a trypsin-sensitive protein, in both cases enhanced by ID-CellStab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the importance of recognising reagent-dependent reactivity in serological testing. Adjustments to the suspension media resolved the incompatibility. Immunohematology laboratories should consider potential reagent interference when unexpected agglutination occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An unusual case of reagent interference in transfusion medicine workup: Pan reactive indirect antiglobulin test caused by commercial saline solution.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Tøffner Pedersen, Helle Bach-Hansen, Kristina Fruerlund Rasmussen, Mark H Yazer, Ulrik Sprogøe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tme.13113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At the regional transfusion service in the Region of Southern Denmark, serological investigations are primarily carried out using column agglutination techniques. This case study examines an unusual instance of reagent interference in pretransfusion testing using column agglutination at the Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 72-year-old male patient presented for pretransfusion testing prior to hernia surgery. He typed as O RhD negative without discrepancies, but the antibody screen showed weakly positive reactions. Routine investigations showed discrepancies, leading to further investigations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Various serological tests were performed using in-house and commercial red test cells suspended in different suspension media and with different column agglutination cards and cassettes. Further investigations included washing of test cells, testing alternative saline solutions, varying incubation temperatures, testing without antihuman-globulin, and applying proteolytic enzymes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reactivity was present with red cells suspended in ID-CellStab (BioRad) but not in Red Cell Diluent (Quidel-Ortho). Reactivity was abolished by using trypsin-treated cells, indicating either the presence of an antibody reacting with-or unspecific agglutination depending on-a trypsin-sensitive protein, in both cases enhanced by ID-CellStab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the importance of recognising reagent-dependent reactivity in serological testing. Adjustments to the suspension media resolved the incompatibility. Immunohematology laboratories should consider potential reagent interference when unexpected agglutination occurs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在南丹麦地区的区域输血服务中,血清学检查主要采用柱凝集技术。本病例研究探讨了丹麦南部阿本拉(Aabenraa)医院在使用柱凝集法进行输血前检测时出现的试剂干扰异常情况:一名 72 岁的男性患者在疝气手术前接受输血前检测。他的分型为 O 型 RhD 阴性,无差异,但抗体筛查显示为弱阳性反应。常规检查结果显示存在差异,因此需要进一步检查:方法:使用悬浮在不同悬浮培养基中的自制和商用红检测细胞以及不同的柱凝集卡和凝集盒进行了各种血清学检测。进一步的研究包括洗涤检测细胞、测试替代生理盐水溶液、改变孵育温度、在不使用抗人球蛋白的情况下进行测试以及使用蛋白水解酶:结果:悬浮在 ID-CellStab (BioRad)中的红细胞会发生反应,而悬浮在红细胞稀释液(Quidel-Ortho)中的红细胞不会发生反应。使用胰蛋白酶处理过的细胞可消除反应,这表明存在与胰蛋白酶敏感蛋白反应的抗体或取决于胰蛋白酶敏感蛋白的非特异性凝集,在这两种情况下,ID-CellStab 均可增强反应:本病例强调了在血清学检测中识别试剂依赖性反应的重要性。对悬浮培养基的调整解决了不相容问题。当出现意外凝集时,免疫血液学实验室应考虑潜在的试剂干扰。
An unusual case of reagent interference in transfusion medicine workup: Pan reactive indirect antiglobulin test caused by commercial saline solution.
Background: At the regional transfusion service in the Region of Southern Denmark, serological investigations are primarily carried out using column agglutination techniques. This case study examines an unusual instance of reagent interference in pretransfusion testing using column agglutination at the Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa.
Case presentation: A 72-year-old male patient presented for pretransfusion testing prior to hernia surgery. He typed as O RhD negative without discrepancies, but the antibody screen showed weakly positive reactions. Routine investigations showed discrepancies, leading to further investigations.
Methods: Various serological tests were performed using in-house and commercial red test cells suspended in different suspension media and with different column agglutination cards and cassettes. Further investigations included washing of test cells, testing alternative saline solutions, varying incubation temperatures, testing without antihuman-globulin, and applying proteolytic enzymes.
Results: Reactivity was present with red cells suspended in ID-CellStab (BioRad) but not in Red Cell Diluent (Quidel-Ortho). Reactivity was abolished by using trypsin-treated cells, indicating either the presence of an antibody reacting with-or unspecific agglutination depending on-a trypsin-sensitive protein, in both cases enhanced by ID-CellStab.
Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of recognising reagent-dependent reactivity in serological testing. Adjustments to the suspension media resolved the incompatibility. Immunohematology laboratories should consider potential reagent interference when unexpected agglutination occurs.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology.
In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.