贝特罗单抗治疗时机对非卧床实体器官移植受者 COVID-19 结局的影响

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Transplant Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1111/tid.14405
Sonsoles Salto-Alejandre, Willa Cochran, Zishan Siddiqui, Julie Langlee, Lauren Boyer, Kristin Freed, Sophia Purekal, Ishaan Gupta, Mary Grace Bowring, Daniel C Brennan, William Werbel, Robin K Avery
{"title":"贝特罗单抗治疗时机对非卧床实体器官移植受者 COVID-19 结局的影响","authors":"Sonsoles Salto-Alejandre, Willa Cochran, Zishan Siddiqui, Julie Langlee, Lauren Boyer, Kristin Freed, Sophia Purekal, Ishaan Gupta, Mary Grace Bowring, Daniel C Brennan, William Werbel, Robin K Avery","doi":"10.1111/tid.14405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes after bebtelovimab treatment for COVID-19 were favorable for most but not all solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) during the era of Omicron BA.2 to BA.5, but effects of timing of bebtelovimab administration on these outcomes are unknown. We sought to compare outcomes of SOTR who received early bebtelovimab (\"EBT\", given ≤ 2 days from diagnosis) versus late bebtelovimab (\"LBT\", given between Days 3 and 7), versus no bebtelovimab (NBT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of SOTRs with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, with endpoint of 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine variables associated with receiving EBT, and to assess impact of EBT on hospitalization. A propensity score (PS) was calculated for EBT versus NBT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 297 SOTRs, 162 (58.1%) received EBT, 46 (16.5%) LBT, and 71 (25.4%) NBT. Early bebtelovimab treatment was associated with a lower risk of 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization compared to NBT (OR, 0.112 [95% CI, 0.018-0.686]; p = 0.018). There was no significant difference in hospitalization risk between LBT and NBT, suggesting that delayed administration may not confer additional benefits over no treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early bebtelovimab treatment in outpatient SOTRs was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization compared to no treatment, while late administration did not show a significant advantage over no treatment. Although bebtelovimab is no longer authorized, these findings suggest that the timing of COVID therapies for SOTRs may be important to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Bebtelovimab Treatment Timing on COVID-19 Outcomes in Ambulatory Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Sonsoles Salto-Alejandre, Willa Cochran, Zishan Siddiqui, Julie Langlee, Lauren Boyer, Kristin Freed, Sophia Purekal, Ishaan Gupta, Mary Grace Bowring, Daniel C Brennan, William Werbel, Robin K Avery\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.14405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes after bebtelovimab treatment for COVID-19 were favorable for most but not all solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) during the era of Omicron BA.2 to BA.5, but effects of timing of bebtelovimab administration on these outcomes are unknown. We sought to compare outcomes of SOTR who received early bebtelovimab (\\\"EBT\\\", given ≤ 2 days from diagnosis) versus late bebtelovimab (\\\"LBT\\\", given between Days 3 and 7), versus no bebtelovimab (NBT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of SOTRs with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, with endpoint of 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine variables associated with receiving EBT, and to assess impact of EBT on hospitalization. A propensity score (PS) was calculated for EBT versus NBT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 297 SOTRs, 162 (58.1%) received EBT, 46 (16.5%) LBT, and 71 (25.4%) NBT. Early bebtelovimab treatment was associated with a lower risk of 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization compared to NBT (OR, 0.112 [95% CI, 0.018-0.686]; p = 0.018). There was no significant difference in hospitalization risk between LBT and NBT, suggesting that delayed administration may not confer additional benefits over no treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early bebtelovimab treatment in outpatient SOTRs was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization compared to no treatment, while late administration did not show a significant advantage over no treatment. Although bebtelovimab is no longer authorized, these findings suggest that the timing of COVID therapies for SOTRs may be important to optimize outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14405\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在Omicron BA.2至BA.5时代,大多数但并非所有实体器官移植受者(SOTR)在接受贝特罗单抗治疗COVID-19后疗效良好,但贝特罗单抗给药时间对这些疗效的影响尚不清楚。我们试图比较接受早期贝特罗单抗("EBT",在确诊后 2 天内给药)和晚期贝特罗单抗("LBT",在第 3 天和第 7 天之间给药)以及未接受贝特罗单抗(NBT)的器官移植受者的预后:这是一项针对轻度至中度 COVID-19 SOTR 的回顾性队列研究,研究终点为 30 天 COVID-19 相关住院治疗。通过多变量逻辑回归确定与接受 EBT 相关的变量,并评估 EBT 对住院治疗的影响。计算了 EBT 与 NBT 的倾向得分(PS):在 297 例 SOTR 中,162 例(58.1%)接受了 EBT,46 例(16.5%)接受了 LBT,71 例(25.4%)接受了 NBT。与 NBT 相比,早期贝特罗单抗治疗与较低的 30 天 COVID-19 相关住院风险相关(OR,0.112 [95% CI,0.018-0.686];P = 0.018)。LBT和NBT的住院风险无明显差异,这表明延迟给药可能不会比不给药带来更多益处:结论:与不治疗相比,SOTR门诊患者早期接受贝特罗单抗治疗可降低住院风险,而延迟用药与不治疗相比并无明显优势。尽管贝特罗单抗已不再获批上市,但这些研究结果表明,COVID疗法治疗SOTR的时机可能对优化疗效非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Bebtelovimab Treatment Timing on COVID-19 Outcomes in Ambulatory Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Background: Outcomes after bebtelovimab treatment for COVID-19 were favorable for most but not all solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) during the era of Omicron BA.2 to BA.5, but effects of timing of bebtelovimab administration on these outcomes are unknown. We sought to compare outcomes of SOTR who received early bebtelovimab ("EBT", given ≤ 2 days from diagnosis) versus late bebtelovimab ("LBT", given between Days 3 and 7), versus no bebtelovimab (NBT).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of SOTRs with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, with endpoint of 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine variables associated with receiving EBT, and to assess impact of EBT on hospitalization. A propensity score (PS) was calculated for EBT versus NBT.

Results: Of 297 SOTRs, 162 (58.1%) received EBT, 46 (16.5%) LBT, and 71 (25.4%) NBT. Early bebtelovimab treatment was associated with a lower risk of 30-day COVID-19-related hospitalization compared to NBT (OR, 0.112 [95% CI, 0.018-0.686]; p = 0.018). There was no significant difference in hospitalization risk between LBT and NBT, suggesting that delayed administration may not confer additional benefits over no treatment.

Conclusions: Early bebtelovimab treatment in outpatient SOTRs was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization compared to no treatment, while late administration did not show a significant advantage over no treatment. Although bebtelovimab is no longer authorized, these findings suggest that the timing of COVID therapies for SOTRs may be important to optimize outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
期刊最新文献
A First Case of Bacterial Pericarditis Due to Campylobacter fetus Infection in a Kidney Transplant Recipient. Disparities in Access to Valganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in High-Risk African American Kidney Transplant Patients. Presentation and Outcomes of Histoplasmosis in Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study. Relationship Between Body Weight and Leukopenia in Non-Kidney Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Normal Renal Function Who Are Receiving Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis. Severe Outcomes of Pneumocystis Pneumonia: A 10-year Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1