Xin Hui S Chan, Ilsa L Haeusler, Bennett J K Choy, Md Zakiul Hassan, Junko Takata, Tara P Hurst, Luke M Jones, Shanghavie Loganathan, Elinor Harriss, Jake Dunning, Joel Tarning, Miles W Carroll, Peter W Horby, Piero L Olliaro
{"title":"尼帕病毒病的治疗方法:支持确定临床试验候选药物优先次序的系统性审查。","authors":"Xin Hui S Chan, Ilsa L Haeusler, Bennett J K Choy, Md Zakiul Hassan, Junko Takata, Tara P Hurst, Luke M Jones, Shanghavie Loganathan, Elinor Harriss, Jake Dunning, Joel Tarning, Miles W Carroll, Peter W Horby, Piero L Olliaro","doi":"10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.101002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nipah virus disease is a bat-borne zoonosis with person-to-person transmission, a case-fatality rate of 38-75%, and well recognised potential to cause a pandemic. The first reported outbreak of Nipah virus disease occurred in Malaysia and Singapore in 1998, which has since been followed by multiple outbreaks in Bangladesh and India. To date, no therapeutics or vaccines have been approved to treat Nipah virus disease, and only few such candidates are in development. In this Review, we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of the therapeutic options (monoclonal antibodies and small molecules) for Nipah virus disease and other henipaviral diseases to support prioritisation of drug candidates for further evaluation in clinical trials. At present, sufficient evidence exists to suggest trialling 1F5, m102.4, and remdesivir (alone or in combination) for prophylaxis and early treatment of Nipah virus disease. In addition to well designed clinical efficacy trials, in-vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies are needed to optimise the selection and dosing of therapeutic candidates in animal challenge and natural human infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":46633,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Microbe","volume":" ","pages":"101002"},"PeriodicalIF":20.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutics for Nipah virus disease: a systematic review to support prioritisation of drug candidates for clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Hui S Chan, Ilsa L Haeusler, Bennett J K Choy, Md Zakiul Hassan, Junko Takata, Tara P Hurst, Luke M Jones, Shanghavie Loganathan, Elinor Harriss, Jake Dunning, Joel Tarning, Miles W Carroll, Peter W Horby, Piero L Olliaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.101002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nipah virus disease is a bat-borne zoonosis with person-to-person transmission, a case-fatality rate of 38-75%, and well recognised potential to cause a pandemic. The first reported outbreak of Nipah virus disease occurred in Malaysia and Singapore in 1998, which has since been followed by multiple outbreaks in Bangladesh and India. To date, no therapeutics or vaccines have been approved to treat Nipah virus disease, and only few such candidates are in development. In this Review, we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of the therapeutic options (monoclonal antibodies and small molecules) for Nipah virus disease and other henipaviral diseases to support prioritisation of drug candidates for further evaluation in clinical trials. At present, sufficient evidence exists to suggest trialling 1F5, m102.4, and remdesivir (alone or in combination) for prophylaxis and early treatment of Nipah virus disease. In addition to well designed clinical efficacy trials, in-vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies are needed to optimise the selection and dosing of therapeutic candidates in animal challenge and natural human infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Microbe\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Microbe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.101002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.101002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Therapeutics for Nipah virus disease: a systematic review to support prioritisation of drug candidates for clinical trials.
Nipah virus disease is a bat-borne zoonosis with person-to-person transmission, a case-fatality rate of 38-75%, and well recognised potential to cause a pandemic. The first reported outbreak of Nipah virus disease occurred in Malaysia and Singapore in 1998, which has since been followed by multiple outbreaks in Bangladesh and India. To date, no therapeutics or vaccines have been approved to treat Nipah virus disease, and only few such candidates are in development. In this Review, we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of the therapeutic options (monoclonal antibodies and small molecules) for Nipah virus disease and other henipaviral diseases to support prioritisation of drug candidates for further evaluation in clinical trials. At present, sufficient evidence exists to suggest trialling 1F5, m102.4, and remdesivir (alone or in combination) for prophylaxis and early treatment of Nipah virus disease. In addition to well designed clinical efficacy trials, in-vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies are needed to optimise the selection and dosing of therapeutic candidates in animal challenge and natural human infection.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Microbe is a gold open access journal committed to publishing content relevant to clinical microbiologists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical understanding, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy.