J F M Geerts, I van den Berg, A M J van Nistelrooij, S M Lagarde, B P L Wijnhoven
{"title":"食管癌和胃癌切除术后再次入院的风险因素。","authors":"J F M Geerts, I van den Berg, A M J van Nistelrooij, S M Lagarde, B P L Wijnhoven","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospital readmission after surgery is a key quality indicator. This nationwide cohort study aimed to assess readmission rates following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer and identify associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) for patients with esophagogastric cancer who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2011 and June 2016. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for 30-day readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5566 patients were included. Readmission within 30 days occurred in 483 of 3488 (13.8%) patients after esophagectomy and 243 of 2078 patients (11.7%) after gastrectomy. Both minor (Clavien Dindo 1-2) and major (Clavien Dindo ≥3) postoperative complications were independent predictors of readmission after esophagectomy (OR 2.99; 95%CI 2.23-4.02; p < 0.001 and OR 5.20; 95%CI 3.82-7.09; p < 0.001). Specific complications included pulmonary (OR 1.49; 95%CI 1.20-1.85; p < 0.001), gastrointestinal (OR 2.43; 95%CI 1.94-3.05; p < 0.001), and infectious (OR 2.27; 95%CI 1.60-3.22; p < 0.001). Prolonged length of stay (pLOS) was associated with higher readmission rates in patients without complications following esophagectomy (OR 1.91 95% CI 1.19-3.07; p = 0.008), but lower rates in those with complications (OR 0.65 95% CI 0.51-0.83; p < 0.001). For gastrectomy, postoperative complications were also linked to readmission (OR 3.18; 95%CI 2.30-4.40; p < 0.001), particularly gastrointestinal (OR 2.16; 95%CI 1.40-3.32; p < 0.001), and infectious (OR 3.80; 95%CI 2.53-5.71; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Readmission after esophagogastric resection is common, particularly among patients with both minor and major postoperative complications. Prolonged stay after esophagectomy impacts readmission risk differently based on the presence of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for readmission following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer.\",\"authors\":\"J F M Geerts, I van den Berg, A M J van Nistelrooij, S M Lagarde, B P L Wijnhoven\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doae101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospital readmission after surgery is a key quality indicator. This nationwide cohort study aimed to assess readmission rates following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer and identify associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) for patients with esophagogastric cancer who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2011 and June 2016. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for 30-day readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5566 patients were included. Readmission within 30 days occurred in 483 of 3488 (13.8%) patients after esophagectomy and 243 of 2078 patients (11.7%) after gastrectomy. Both minor (Clavien Dindo 1-2) and major (Clavien Dindo ≥3) postoperative complications were independent predictors of readmission after esophagectomy (OR 2.99; 95%CI 2.23-4.02; p < 0.001 and OR 5.20; 95%CI 3.82-7.09; p < 0.001). Specific complications included pulmonary (OR 1.49; 95%CI 1.20-1.85; p < 0.001), gastrointestinal (OR 2.43; 95%CI 1.94-3.05; p < 0.001), and infectious (OR 2.27; 95%CI 1.60-3.22; p < 0.001). Prolonged length of stay (pLOS) was associated with higher readmission rates in patients without complications following esophagectomy (OR 1.91 95% CI 1.19-3.07; p = 0.008), but lower rates in those with complications (OR 0.65 95% CI 0.51-0.83; p < 0.001). For gastrectomy, postoperative complications were also linked to readmission (OR 3.18; 95%CI 2.30-4.40; p < 0.001), particularly gastrointestinal (OR 2.16; 95%CI 1.40-3.32; p < 0.001), and infectious (OR 3.80; 95%CI 2.53-5.71; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Readmission after esophagogastric resection is common, particularly among patients with both minor and major postoperative complications. Prolonged stay after esophagectomy impacts readmission risk differently based on the presence of complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介手术后再入院是一项关键的质量指标。这项全国性的队列研究旨在评估食管癌和胃癌切除术后的再入院率,并确定相关的风险因素:从荷兰上消化道癌症审计(Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit,DUCA)中提取了2011年1月至2016年6月期间以治愈为目的接受食管切除术或胃切除术的食管胃癌患者的数据。逻辑回归分析确定了30天再入院的风险因素:结果:共纳入5566名患者。3488例食管切除术后患者中有483例(13.8%)在30天内再次入院,2078例胃切除术后患者中有243例(11.7%)在30天内再次入院。轻度(Clavien Dindo 1-2)和重度(Clavien Dindo ≥3)术后并发症都是食管切除术后再入院的独立预测因素(OR 2.99;95%CI 2.23-4.02;P 结论:食管胃切除术后再入院的发生率较低:食管胃切除术后再次入院很常见,尤其是术后出现轻微和严重并发症的患者。食管切除术后住院时间延长对再入院风险的影响因并发症的存在而不同。
Risk factors for readmission following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer.
Introduction: Hospital readmission after surgery is a key quality indicator. This nationwide cohort study aimed to assess readmission rates following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer and identify associated risk factors.
Methods: Data were extracted from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) for patients with esophagogastric cancer who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2011 and June 2016. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for 30-day readmission.
Results: In total, 5566 patients were included. Readmission within 30 days occurred in 483 of 3488 (13.8%) patients after esophagectomy and 243 of 2078 patients (11.7%) after gastrectomy. Both minor (Clavien Dindo 1-2) and major (Clavien Dindo ≥3) postoperative complications were independent predictors of readmission after esophagectomy (OR 2.99; 95%CI 2.23-4.02; p < 0.001 and OR 5.20; 95%CI 3.82-7.09; p < 0.001). Specific complications included pulmonary (OR 1.49; 95%CI 1.20-1.85; p < 0.001), gastrointestinal (OR 2.43; 95%CI 1.94-3.05; p < 0.001), and infectious (OR 2.27; 95%CI 1.60-3.22; p < 0.001). Prolonged length of stay (pLOS) was associated with higher readmission rates in patients without complications following esophagectomy (OR 1.91 95% CI 1.19-3.07; p = 0.008), but lower rates in those with complications (OR 0.65 95% CI 0.51-0.83; p < 0.001). For gastrectomy, postoperative complications were also linked to readmission (OR 3.18; 95%CI 2.30-4.40; p < 0.001), particularly gastrointestinal (OR 2.16; 95%CI 1.40-3.32; p < 0.001), and infectious (OR 3.80; 95%CI 2.53-5.71; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Readmission after esophagogastric resection is common, particularly among patients with both minor and major postoperative complications. Prolonged stay after esophagectomy impacts readmission risk differently based on the presence of complications.