Hayley Colton, Natalie Barratt, Nigel Temperton, Hailey Hornsby, Adrienn Angyal, Irina Grouneva, Benjamin B Lindsey, Pamela Kearns, Eleanor Barnes, Carl S Goodyear, Alex Richter, David Thomas, Gordon Cook, Iain B McInnes, Michelle Willicombe, Stefan Siebert, Kim Orchard, Rachael Selby, Sarah Bowden, Paul J Collini, Ann Pope, Amanda Kirkham, Barbara Kronsteiner, Susanna J Dunachie, Paul Miller, Jennifer Clay, Erin Hurst, Ram Malladi, Murali Kesavan, Francesca Kinsella, Robin Sanderson, Kwee L Yong, Daniel Rea, Helen Parry, Sean H Lim, John A Snowden, Thushan I de Silva
{"title":"与 mRNA 疫苗相比,造血细胞移植受者接种 ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) 疫苗后,SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体反应的保存率更高。","authors":"Hayley Colton, Natalie Barratt, Nigel Temperton, Hailey Hornsby, Adrienn Angyal, Irina Grouneva, Benjamin B Lindsey, Pamela Kearns, Eleanor Barnes, Carl S Goodyear, Alex Richter, David Thomas, Gordon Cook, Iain B McInnes, Michelle Willicombe, Stefan Siebert, Kim Orchard, Rachael Selby, Sarah Bowden, Paul J Collini, Ann Pope, Amanda Kirkham, Barbara Kronsteiner, Susanna J Dunachie, Paul Miller, Jennifer Clay, Erin Hurst, Ram Malladi, Murali Kesavan, Francesca Kinsella, Robin Sanderson, Kwee L Yong, Daniel Rea, Helen Parry, Sean H Lim, John A Snowden, Thushan I de Silva","doi":"10.1111/bjh.19874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whilst SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines generate high neutralising antibodies (nAb) in most individuals, haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) recipients respond poorly. HSCT/CAR-T treatment ablates existing immune memory, with recipients requiring revaccination analogous to being vaccine naive. An optimal revaccination strategy for this cohort has not been defined. Factors predicting immunogenicity following three ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were assessed in 198 HSCT/CAR-T recipients and 96 healthcare workers (HCWs) recruited to multicentre studies. Only 25% of HSCT/CAR-T recipients generated nAbs following one dose, with titres 167-fold and 7-fold lower than that in HCWs after the first and second doses, respectively. Lower post-second dose nAb titres were associated with older age, rituximab use, and previous HSCT. ChAdOx1-S recipients were more likely to generate nAbs compared with mRNA vaccines, with titres comparable to HCWs. In contrast, nAbs were significantly lower in HSCT/CAR-T recipients than HCWs after mRNA vaccination. The poor first-dose immunogenicity in HSCT/CAR-T recipients suggests a minimum licensed dosing interval could limit the period of vulnerability following HSCT/CAR-T. The relative preservation of nAbs with ChAdOx1-S vaccination highlights the importance of evaluating alternative platforms to mRNA vaccination within this highly vulnerable clinical cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greater preservation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody responses following the ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) vaccine compared with mRNA vaccines in haematopoietic cell transplant recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Hayley Colton, Natalie Barratt, Nigel Temperton, Hailey Hornsby, Adrienn Angyal, Irina Grouneva, Benjamin B Lindsey, Pamela Kearns, Eleanor Barnes, Carl S Goodyear, Alex Richter, David Thomas, Gordon Cook, Iain B McInnes, Michelle Willicombe, Stefan Siebert, Kim Orchard, Rachael Selby, Sarah Bowden, Paul J Collini, Ann Pope, Amanda Kirkham, Barbara Kronsteiner, Susanna J Dunachie, Paul Miller, Jennifer Clay, Erin Hurst, Ram Malladi, Murali Kesavan, Francesca Kinsella, Robin Sanderson, Kwee L Yong, Daniel Rea, Helen Parry, Sean H Lim, John A Snowden, Thushan I de Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.19874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Whilst SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines generate high neutralising antibodies (nAb) in most individuals, haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) recipients respond poorly. HSCT/CAR-T treatment ablates existing immune memory, with recipients requiring revaccination analogous to being vaccine naive. An optimal revaccination strategy for this cohort has not been defined. Factors predicting immunogenicity following three ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were assessed in 198 HSCT/CAR-T recipients and 96 healthcare workers (HCWs) recruited to multicentre studies. Only 25% of HSCT/CAR-T recipients generated nAbs following one dose, with titres 167-fold and 7-fold lower than that in HCWs after the first and second doses, respectively. Lower post-second dose nAb titres were associated with older age, rituximab use, and previous HSCT. ChAdOx1-S recipients were more likely to generate nAbs compared with mRNA vaccines, with titres comparable to HCWs. In contrast, nAbs were significantly lower in HSCT/CAR-T recipients than HCWs after mRNA vaccination. The poor first-dose immunogenicity in HSCT/CAR-T recipients suggests a minimum licensed dosing interval could limit the period of vulnerability following HSCT/CAR-T. The relative preservation of nAbs with ChAdOx1-S vaccination highlights the importance of evaluating alternative platforms to mRNA vaccination within this highly vulnerable clinical cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19874\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19874","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Greater preservation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody responses following the ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) vaccine compared with mRNA vaccines in haematopoietic cell transplant recipients.
Whilst SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines generate high neutralising antibodies (nAb) in most individuals, haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) recipients respond poorly. HSCT/CAR-T treatment ablates existing immune memory, with recipients requiring revaccination analogous to being vaccine naive. An optimal revaccination strategy for this cohort has not been defined. Factors predicting immunogenicity following three ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were assessed in 198 HSCT/CAR-T recipients and 96 healthcare workers (HCWs) recruited to multicentre studies. Only 25% of HSCT/CAR-T recipients generated nAbs following one dose, with titres 167-fold and 7-fold lower than that in HCWs after the first and second doses, respectively. Lower post-second dose nAb titres were associated with older age, rituximab use, and previous HSCT. ChAdOx1-S recipients were more likely to generate nAbs compared with mRNA vaccines, with titres comparable to HCWs. In contrast, nAbs were significantly lower in HSCT/CAR-T recipients than HCWs after mRNA vaccination. The poor first-dose immunogenicity in HSCT/CAR-T recipients suggests a minimum licensed dosing interval could limit the period of vulnerability following HSCT/CAR-T. The relative preservation of nAbs with ChAdOx1-S vaccination highlights the importance of evaluating alternative platforms to mRNA vaccination within this highly vulnerable clinical cohort.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.