与 mRNA 疫苗相比,造血细胞移植受者接种 ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) 疫苗后,SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体反应的保存率更高。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY British Journal of Haematology Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1111/bjh.19874
Hayley Colton, Natalie Barratt, Nigel Temperton, Hailey Hornsby, Adrienn Angyal, Irina Grouneva, Benjamin B Lindsey, Pamela Kearns, Eleanor Barnes, Carl S Goodyear, Alex Richter, David Thomas, Gordon Cook, Iain B McInnes, Michelle Willicombe, Stefan Siebert, Kim Orchard, Rachael Selby, Sarah Bowden, Paul J Collini, Ann Pope, Amanda Kirkham, Barbara Kronsteiner, Susanna J Dunachie, Paul Miller, Jennifer Clay, Erin Hurst, Ram Malladi, Murali Kesavan, Francesca Kinsella, Robin Sanderson, Kwee L Yong, Daniel Rea, Helen Parry, Sean H Lim, John A Snowden, Thushan I de Silva
{"title":"与 mRNA 疫苗相比,造血细胞移植受者接种 ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) 疫苗后,SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体反应的保存率更高。","authors":"Hayley Colton, Natalie Barratt, Nigel Temperton, Hailey Hornsby, Adrienn Angyal, Irina Grouneva, Benjamin B Lindsey, Pamela Kearns, Eleanor Barnes, Carl S Goodyear, Alex Richter, David Thomas, Gordon Cook, Iain B McInnes, Michelle Willicombe, Stefan Siebert, Kim Orchard, Rachael Selby, Sarah Bowden, Paul J Collini, Ann Pope, Amanda Kirkham, Barbara Kronsteiner, Susanna J Dunachie, Paul Miller, Jennifer Clay, Erin Hurst, Ram Malladi, Murali Kesavan, Francesca Kinsella, Robin Sanderson, Kwee L Yong, Daniel Rea, Helen Parry, Sean H Lim, John A Snowden, Thushan I de Silva","doi":"10.1111/bjh.19874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whilst SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines generate high neutralising antibodies (nAb) in most individuals, haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) recipients respond poorly. HSCT/CAR-T treatment ablates existing immune memory, with recipients requiring revaccination analogous to being vaccine naive. An optimal revaccination strategy for this cohort has not been defined. Factors predicting immunogenicity following three ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were assessed in 198 HSCT/CAR-T recipients and 96 healthcare workers (HCWs) recruited to multicentre studies. Only 25% of HSCT/CAR-T recipients generated nAbs following one dose, with titres 167-fold and 7-fold lower than that in HCWs after the first and second doses, respectively. Lower post-second dose nAb titres were associated with older age, rituximab use, and previous HSCT. ChAdOx1-S recipients were more likely to generate nAbs compared with mRNA vaccines, with titres comparable to HCWs. In contrast, nAbs were significantly lower in HSCT/CAR-T recipients than HCWs after mRNA vaccination. The poor first-dose immunogenicity in HSCT/CAR-T recipients suggests a minimum licensed dosing interval could limit the period of vulnerability following HSCT/CAR-T. The relative preservation of nAbs with ChAdOx1-S vaccination highlights the importance of evaluating alternative platforms to mRNA vaccination within this highly vulnerable clinical cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greater preservation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody responses following the ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) vaccine compared with mRNA vaccines in haematopoietic cell transplant recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Hayley Colton, Natalie Barratt, Nigel Temperton, Hailey Hornsby, Adrienn Angyal, Irina Grouneva, Benjamin B Lindsey, Pamela Kearns, Eleanor Barnes, Carl S Goodyear, Alex Richter, David Thomas, Gordon Cook, Iain B McInnes, Michelle Willicombe, Stefan Siebert, Kim Orchard, Rachael Selby, Sarah Bowden, Paul J Collini, Ann Pope, Amanda Kirkham, Barbara Kronsteiner, Susanna J Dunachie, Paul Miller, Jennifer Clay, Erin Hurst, Ram Malladi, Murali Kesavan, Francesca Kinsella, Robin Sanderson, Kwee L Yong, Daniel Rea, Helen Parry, Sean H Lim, John A Snowden, Thushan I de Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.19874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Whilst SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines generate high neutralising antibodies (nAb) in most individuals, haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) recipients respond poorly. HSCT/CAR-T treatment ablates existing immune memory, with recipients requiring revaccination analogous to being vaccine naive. An optimal revaccination strategy for this cohort has not been defined. Factors predicting immunogenicity following three ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were assessed in 198 HSCT/CAR-T recipients and 96 healthcare workers (HCWs) recruited to multicentre studies. Only 25% of HSCT/CAR-T recipients generated nAbs following one dose, with titres 167-fold and 7-fold lower than that in HCWs after the first and second doses, respectively. Lower post-second dose nAb titres were associated with older age, rituximab use, and previous HSCT. ChAdOx1-S recipients were more likely to generate nAbs compared with mRNA vaccines, with titres comparable to HCWs. In contrast, nAbs were significantly lower in HSCT/CAR-T recipients than HCWs after mRNA vaccination. The poor first-dose immunogenicity in HSCT/CAR-T recipients suggests a minimum licensed dosing interval could limit the period of vulnerability following HSCT/CAR-T. The relative preservation of nAbs with ChAdOx1-S vaccination highlights the importance of evaluating alternative platforms to mRNA vaccination within this highly vulnerable clinical cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19874\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19874","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA 疫苗能在大多数人体内产生较高的中和抗体 (nAb),但造血干细胞移植 (HSCT) 和嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞 (CAR-T) 受体的反应较差。造血干细胞移植/嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CAR-T)治疗会消减现有的免疫记忆,受者需要重新接种,就像接种天真疫苗一样。这一群体的最佳再接种策略尚未确定。我们对多中心研究中招募的 198 名造血干细胞移植/CAR-T 受者和 96 名医护人员(HCWs)进行了研究,评估了预测三种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗免疫原性的因素。只有 25% 的造血干细胞移植/CAR-T 受者在接种一剂疫苗后产生了 nAb,其滴度分别比医护人员在接种第一剂和第二剂疫苗后低 167 倍和 7 倍。第二剂后较低的 nAb 滴度与年龄较大、使用利妥昔单抗和既往接受过造血干细胞移植有关。与 mRNA 疫苗相比,ChAdOx1-S 接种者更有可能产生 nAb,其滴度与高危人群相当。相比之下,mRNA 疫苗接种后,造血干细胞移植/CAR-T 受者的 nAbs 明显低于高危人群。HSCT/CAR-T 受者的首剂免疫原性较差,这表明最小许可剂量间隔可限制 HSCT/CAR-T 后的易感期。接种 ChAdOx1-S 可相对保留 nAbs,这凸显了在这种高度易感的临床人群中评估 mRNA 疫苗接种替代平台的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Greater preservation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody responses following the ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) vaccine compared with mRNA vaccines in haematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Whilst SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines generate high neutralising antibodies (nAb) in most individuals, haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) recipients respond poorly. HSCT/CAR-T treatment ablates existing immune memory, with recipients requiring revaccination analogous to being vaccine naive. An optimal revaccination strategy for this cohort has not been defined. Factors predicting immunogenicity following three ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were assessed in 198 HSCT/CAR-T recipients and 96 healthcare workers (HCWs) recruited to multicentre studies. Only 25% of HSCT/CAR-T recipients generated nAbs following one dose, with titres 167-fold and 7-fold lower than that in HCWs after the first and second doses, respectively. Lower post-second dose nAb titres were associated with older age, rituximab use, and previous HSCT. ChAdOx1-S recipients were more likely to generate nAbs compared with mRNA vaccines, with titres comparable to HCWs. In contrast, nAbs were significantly lower in HSCT/CAR-T recipients than HCWs after mRNA vaccination. The poor first-dose immunogenicity in HSCT/CAR-T recipients suggests a minimum licensed dosing interval could limit the period of vulnerability following HSCT/CAR-T. The relative preservation of nAbs with ChAdOx1-S vaccination highlights the importance of evaluating alternative platforms to mRNA vaccination within this highly vulnerable clinical cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Are we there yet? CAR-T therapy in multiple myeloma. Rates of discordant CD20 status by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry in B-ALL. Inhibition of FcRn with rozanolixizumab in adults with immune thrombocytopenia: Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies and their open-label extension. Greater preservation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody responses following the ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) vaccine compared with mRNA vaccines in haematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Impact of hydroxycarbamide treatment on the whole-blood transcriptome in sickle cell disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1