对镇痛的预期会增加健康参与者对条件性疼痛调节的抑制性反应,而这些参与者的基线是非抑制性的。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1002/ejp.4747
Allen Matheus S Nascimento, Soraya S Ardestani, Isabela C Novaes, Paulo César R Conti, Leonardo R Bonjardim, Fernando G Exposto, Peter Svensson, Yuri M Costa
{"title":"对镇痛的预期会增加健康参与者对条件性疼痛调节的抑制性反应,而这些参与者的基线是非抑制性的。","authors":"Allen Matheus S Nascimento, Soraya S Ardestani, Isabela C Novaes, Paulo César R Conti, Leonardo R Bonjardim, Fernando G Exposto, Peter Svensson, Yuri M Costa","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the effect of expectation of analgesia on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in healthy participants stratified into inhibitors and non-inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel CPM protocol was assessed on 21 women and 22 men across two sessions: baseline and expectation of analgesia, which was induced by a standardized audiovisual suggestion. The CPM assessment involved two different test stimuli (TS): mechanically controlled palpation and the pressure pain threshold, applied to two different regions: anterior temporalis and thenar eminence of the hand. The conditioning stimulus (CS) involved immersing the non-dominant forearm in cold water. The order of the TS and regions was randomized for each participant. The CPM protocol was performed three times, with a 1-min interval between TS/region sequences. After a 20-min rest, the CPM assessment was repeated (two blocks in total). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was computed to identify inhibitors (inhibitory responses) and non-inhibitors (including non-inhibitors and facilitatory responses). Cochran's Q, ANOVA and ANCOVA were applied to the data (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant decrease in the proportion of non-inhibitors during the expectation of analgesia session (32.6%-44.2%) when compared with the baseline session (51.2%-72.1%). The non-inhibitors exhibited a lower inhibitory CPM magnitude than the inhibitors only in block 1 of the baseline session. The expectation of analgesia resulted in an increased magnitude of the inhibitory CPM solely in non-inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Expectation of analgesia can increase the inhibitory response of the CPM beyond the measurement error in healthy participants with a baseline non-inhibitory profile.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Several studies have investigated whether cognitive modulation can alter the magnitude of the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation (CPM), yet some gaps remain. This study accounted for measurement error to accurately determine changes in CPM influenced by expectation of analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expectation of analgesia increases the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation in healthy participants who at baseline have a non-inhibitory profile.\",\"authors\":\"Allen Matheus S Nascimento, Soraya S Ardestani, Isabela C Novaes, Paulo César R Conti, Leonardo R Bonjardim, Fernando G Exposto, Peter Svensson, Yuri M Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.4747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the effect of expectation of analgesia on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in healthy participants stratified into inhibitors and non-inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel CPM protocol was assessed on 21 women and 22 men across two sessions: baseline and expectation of analgesia, which was induced by a standardized audiovisual suggestion. The CPM assessment involved two different test stimuli (TS): mechanically controlled palpation and the pressure pain threshold, applied to two different regions: anterior temporalis and thenar eminence of the hand. The conditioning stimulus (CS) involved immersing the non-dominant forearm in cold water. The order of the TS and regions was randomized for each participant. The CPM protocol was performed three times, with a 1-min interval between TS/region sequences. After a 20-min rest, the CPM assessment was repeated (two blocks in total). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was computed to identify inhibitors (inhibitory responses) and non-inhibitors (including non-inhibitors and facilitatory responses). Cochran's Q, ANOVA and ANCOVA were applied to the data (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant decrease in the proportion of non-inhibitors during the expectation of analgesia session (32.6%-44.2%) when compared with the baseline session (51.2%-72.1%). The non-inhibitors exhibited a lower inhibitory CPM magnitude than the inhibitors only in block 1 of the baseline session. The expectation of analgesia resulted in an increased magnitude of the inhibitory CPM solely in non-inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Expectation of analgesia can increase the inhibitory response of the CPM beyond the measurement error in healthy participants with a baseline non-inhibitory profile.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Several studies have investigated whether cognitive modulation can alter the magnitude of the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation (CPM), yet some gaps remain. This study accounted for measurement error to accurately determine changes in CPM influenced by expectation of analgesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4747\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了镇痛预期对条件性疼痛调节(CPM)的影响:本研究评估了镇痛预期对条件性疼痛调节(CPM)的影响,研究对象为健康参与者,分为抑制者和非抑制者:方法:对 21 名女性和 22 名男性进行了平行 CPM 方案评估,分为两个阶段:基线和镇痛预期,镇痛预期由标准化视听暗示诱导。CPM 评估包括两种不同的测试刺激(TS):机械控制的触诊和压力痛阈,分别作用于两个不同的区域:颞前肌和手部的肩峰。条件刺激(CS)是将非优势前臂浸入冷水中。每位受试者的 TS 和区域顺序都是随机的。CPM 方案进行三次,TS/区域序列之间间隔 1 分钟。休息 20 分钟后,重复 CPM 评估(共两组)。计算测量标准误差 (SEM) 以确定抑制剂(抑制性反应)和非抑制剂(包括非抑制剂和促进性反应)。对数据进行了 Cochran's Q、方差分析和方差分析(P 结果:与基线疗程(51.2%-72.1%)相比,预期镇痛疗程中的非抑制剂比例(32.6%-44.2%)明显下降。非抑制剂仅在基线训练的第 1 区块表现出比抑制剂更低的抑制性 CPM 幅值。仅在非抑制剂中,对镇痛的期望导致抑制性 CPM 幅度增加:结论:对于基线非抑制性特征的健康参与者来说,镇痛预期会增加 CPM 的抑制性反应,超出测量误差:有几项研究探讨了认知调节是否能改变条件性疼痛调节(CPM)抑制性反应的大小,但仍存在一些不足。本研究考虑了测量误差,以准确确定受镇痛预期影响的 CPM 变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expectation of analgesia increases the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation in healthy participants who at baseline have a non-inhibitory profile.

Background: This study assessed the effect of expectation of analgesia on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in healthy participants stratified into inhibitors and non-inhibitors.

Methods: A parallel CPM protocol was assessed on 21 women and 22 men across two sessions: baseline and expectation of analgesia, which was induced by a standardized audiovisual suggestion. The CPM assessment involved two different test stimuli (TS): mechanically controlled palpation and the pressure pain threshold, applied to two different regions: anterior temporalis and thenar eminence of the hand. The conditioning stimulus (CS) involved immersing the non-dominant forearm in cold water. The order of the TS and regions was randomized for each participant. The CPM protocol was performed three times, with a 1-min interval between TS/region sequences. After a 20-min rest, the CPM assessment was repeated (two blocks in total). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was computed to identify inhibitors (inhibitory responses) and non-inhibitors (including non-inhibitors and facilitatory responses). Cochran's Q, ANOVA and ANCOVA were applied to the data (p < 0.05).

Results: There was a significant decrease in the proportion of non-inhibitors during the expectation of analgesia session (32.6%-44.2%) when compared with the baseline session (51.2%-72.1%). The non-inhibitors exhibited a lower inhibitory CPM magnitude than the inhibitors only in block 1 of the baseline session. The expectation of analgesia resulted in an increased magnitude of the inhibitory CPM solely in non-inhibitors.

Conclusion: Expectation of analgesia can increase the inhibitory response of the CPM beyond the measurement error in healthy participants with a baseline non-inhibitory profile.

Significance: Several studies have investigated whether cognitive modulation can alter the magnitude of the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation (CPM), yet some gaps remain. This study accounted for measurement error to accurately determine changes in CPM influenced by expectation of analgesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
期刊最新文献
Expectation of analgesia increases the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation in healthy participants who at baseline have a non-inhibitory profile. Correction to 'Systematic review and co-ordinate based meta-analysis to summarize the utilization of functional brain imaging in conjunction with human models of peripheral and central sensitization'. Exploring signs of central sensitization in adolescents with hypermobility Spectrum disorder or hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management. Chronic pain among primary fentanyl users: The concept of self-medication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1