评估和比较当前人工智能程序对视网膜/玻璃体疾病和治疗方法的了解程度。

IF 1.2 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_192_23
Eyupcan Sensoy, Mehmet Citirik
{"title":"评估和比较当前人工智能程序对视网膜/玻璃体疾病和治疗方法的了解程度。","authors":"Eyupcan Sensoy, Mehmet Citirik","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_192_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the answers to multiple-choice questions about retina and vitreous diseases and treatment modalities of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), Bard, and Bing artificial intelligence chatbots, examining the level of knowledge about these subjects, and investigating the existence of their superiority over each other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six questions related to retinal and vitreous diseases and treatment modalities were asked to ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard chatbots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bing artificial intelligence chatbot correctly answered 76.1% of the questions. ChatGPT and Bard artificial intelligence chatbots correctly answered 60.9% of the questions. No statistically significant difference was observed between the rates of correct and incorrect answers to the questions on the three artificial intelligence chatbots (<i>P</i> = 0.206).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial intelligence chatbots can be used to access accurate information about retinal and vitreous diseases and treatment modalities. However, the information obtained may not always be correct, and care should be taken about its use and results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"36 1","pages":"78-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Comparison of the Knowledge Levels of Current Artificial Intelligence Programs on Retinal/Vitreous Diseases and Treatment Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Eyupcan Sensoy, Mehmet Citirik\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joco.joco_192_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the answers to multiple-choice questions about retina and vitreous diseases and treatment modalities of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), Bard, and Bing artificial intelligence chatbots, examining the level of knowledge about these subjects, and investigating the existence of their superiority over each other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six questions related to retinal and vitreous diseases and treatment modalities were asked to ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard chatbots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bing artificial intelligence chatbot correctly answered 76.1% of the questions. ChatGPT and Bard artificial intelligence chatbots correctly answered 60.9% of the questions. No statistically significant difference was observed between the rates of correct and incorrect answers to the questions on the three artificial intelligence chatbots (<i>P</i> = 0.206).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial intelligence chatbots can be used to access accurate information about retinal and vitreous diseases and treatment modalities. However, the information obtained may not always be correct, and care should be taken about its use and results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"78-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567598/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_192_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_192_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估 Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer(ChatGPT)、Bard 和 Bing 人工智能聊天机器人对有关视网膜和玻璃体疾病及治疗方式的多选题的回答,考察它们对这些主题的了解程度,并研究它们之间是否存在优劣势:向 ChatGPT、Bing 和 Bard 聊天机器人提出了 46 个与视网膜和玻璃体疾病及治疗方法相关的问题:结果:Bing 人工智能聊天机器人正确回答了 76.1% 的问题。ChatGPT 和 Bard 人工智能聊天机器人正确回答了 60.9% 的问题。三个人工智能聊天机器人回答问题的正确率和错误率在统计学上没有明显差异(P = 0.206):人工智能聊天机器人可用于获取有关视网膜和玻璃体疾病及治疗方法的准确信息。结论:人工智能聊天机器人可用于获取有关视网膜和玻璃体疾病及治疗方式的准确信息,但所获取的信息不一定总是正确的,因此应谨慎使用并注意其结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation and Comparison of the Knowledge Levels of Current Artificial Intelligence Programs on Retinal/Vitreous Diseases and Treatment Methods.

Purpose: To evaluate the answers to multiple-choice questions about retina and vitreous diseases and treatment modalities of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), Bard, and Bing artificial intelligence chatbots, examining the level of knowledge about these subjects, and investigating the existence of their superiority over each other.

Methods: Forty-six questions related to retinal and vitreous diseases and treatment modalities were asked to ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard chatbots.

Results: The Bing artificial intelligence chatbot correctly answered 76.1% of the questions. ChatGPT and Bard artificial intelligence chatbots correctly answered 60.9% of the questions. No statistically significant difference was observed between the rates of correct and incorrect answers to the questions on the three artificial intelligence chatbots (P = 0.206).

Conclusions: Artificial intelligence chatbots can be used to access accurate information about retinal and vitreous diseases and treatment modalities. However, the information obtained may not always be correct, and care should be taken about its use and results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Central Serous Retinopathy: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Evaluation and Comparison of the Knowledge Levels of Current Artificial Intelligence Programs on Retinal/Vitreous Diseases and Treatment Methods. Evaluation of the Activity of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease; A Comparison of Indocyanine Green Angiography Scoring, Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography, and Choroidal Vascularity Index. How Safe is Nd: YAG Laser Capsulotomy in Patients with Uveitis? Outcomes of a Long-Term Study. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Gland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1