外科住院医师视频教学的效果:随机对照试验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.10.7856
Khurram Niaz, Usman Mahboob, Darakshan Masood, Ali Maqbool
{"title":"外科住院医师视频教学的效果:随机对照试验。","authors":"Khurram Niaz, Usman Mahboob, Darakshan Masood, Ali Maqbool","doi":"10.12669/pjms.40.10.7856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of video-based teaching in surgery residents by comparing it to the routine operating room traditional teaching.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The randomized control trial was done at four institutions from September 2022 to March 2023. Interventional group underwent video-based instruction of basic surgical skills whereas the control group was taught through traditional operating room teaching. Pre and post-test mean scores were analyzed on SPSS version 20 through paired t-test. Learning gain was calculated. Supervisors' perceptions were recorded on survey form regarding direct observations and recorded video evaluations of resident skills on post-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of sixty (n=60), fifty-five newly inducted surgical residents completed the study including both females (n=13) and male residents (n=42). Video intervention Group (27.93±3.72) and control group (23.07±4.62) both showed improvements in their post-test scores as compared to pretest scores of 13.68±3.25 and 13.52±3.60 respectively. Mean score difference improvement was more in video intervention group (13.9±3.8) in comparison to control group (9.5±4.3) provided both groups exhibits improvements in all seven domains of the global rating system (reflected by the p <0.0001). However, learning gain of 65% was observed in intervention group as compared to learning gain (41%) of control group. Evaluators(n=5) observed that recorded video evaluations helped to provide integrated feedback, despite being time (40%) and resource intensive (60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Video-based teaching has higher learning gain irrespective of the fact that both groups exhibit statistically significant results in all seven domains of the global rating system. Recorded video evaluation was found feasible and reliable tool for formative assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"40 10","pages":"2373-2378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of video-based teaching in surgery residents: A randomized control trial.\",\"authors\":\"Khurram Niaz, Usman Mahboob, Darakshan Masood, Ali Maqbool\",\"doi\":\"10.12669/pjms.40.10.7856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of video-based teaching in surgery residents by comparing it to the routine operating room traditional teaching.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The randomized control trial was done at four institutions from September 2022 to March 2023. Interventional group underwent video-based instruction of basic surgical skills whereas the control group was taught through traditional operating room teaching. Pre and post-test mean scores were analyzed on SPSS version 20 through paired t-test. Learning gain was calculated. Supervisors' perceptions were recorded on survey form regarding direct observations and recorded video evaluations of resident skills on post-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of sixty (n=60), fifty-five newly inducted surgical residents completed the study including both females (n=13) and male residents (n=42). Video intervention Group (27.93±3.72) and control group (23.07±4.62) both showed improvements in their post-test scores as compared to pretest scores of 13.68±3.25 and 13.52±3.60 respectively. Mean score difference improvement was more in video intervention group (13.9±3.8) in comparison to control group (9.5±4.3) provided both groups exhibits improvements in all seven domains of the global rating system (reflected by the p <0.0001). However, learning gain of 65% was observed in intervention group as compared to learning gain (41%) of control group. Evaluators(n=5) observed that recorded video evaluations helped to provide integrated feedback, despite being time (40%) and resource intensive (60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Video-based teaching has higher learning gain irrespective of the fact that both groups exhibit statistically significant results in all seven domains of the global rating system. Recorded video evaluation was found feasible and reliable tool for formative assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"40 10\",\"pages\":\"2373-2378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568741/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.7856\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.7856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过比较视频教学与常规手术室传统教学,确定视频教学在外科住院医生中的有效性:随机对照试验于 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月在四所院校进行。干预组接受基于视频的外科基本技能教学,而对照组则接受传统的手术室教学。通过配对 t 检验对 SPSS 20 版本进行了前后测试平均分分析。计算学习收获。在调查表中记录了督导对住院医师技能的直接观察和录制的视频评估的看法:在 60 名住院医师(n=60)中,有 55 名新入职的外科住院医师完成了研究,其中包括女性(n=13)和男性(n=42)。视频干预组(27.93±3.72)和对照组(23.07±4.62)的后测得分与前测得分(13.68±3.25)和(13.52±3.60)相比均有所提高。与对照组(9.5±4.3)分相比,视频干预组(13.9±3.8)分的平均分差提高幅度更大,因为两组在总评分系统的所有七个领域都有提高(由 p 反映):基于视频的教学具有更高的学习收益,尽管两组在全球评分系统的所有七个领域都表现出了具有统计学意义的结果。录制的视频评价被认为是可行且可靠的形成性评价工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of video-based teaching in surgery residents: A randomized control trial.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of video-based teaching in surgery residents by comparing it to the routine operating room traditional teaching.

Methodology: The randomized control trial was done at four institutions from September 2022 to March 2023. Interventional group underwent video-based instruction of basic surgical skills whereas the control group was taught through traditional operating room teaching. Pre and post-test mean scores were analyzed on SPSS version 20 through paired t-test. Learning gain was calculated. Supervisors' perceptions were recorded on survey form regarding direct observations and recorded video evaluations of resident skills on post-test.

Results: Out of sixty (n=60), fifty-five newly inducted surgical residents completed the study including both females (n=13) and male residents (n=42). Video intervention Group (27.93±3.72) and control group (23.07±4.62) both showed improvements in their post-test scores as compared to pretest scores of 13.68±3.25 and 13.52±3.60 respectively. Mean score difference improvement was more in video intervention group (13.9±3.8) in comparison to control group (9.5±4.3) provided both groups exhibits improvements in all seven domains of the global rating system (reflected by the p <0.0001). However, learning gain of 65% was observed in intervention group as compared to learning gain (41%) of control group. Evaluators(n=5) observed that recorded video evaluations helped to provide integrated feedback, despite being time (40%) and resource intensive (60%).

Conclusion: Video-based teaching has higher learning gain irrespective of the fact that both groups exhibit statistically significant results in all seven domains of the global rating system. Recorded video evaluation was found feasible and reliable tool for formative assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
期刊最新文献
A day of shame. A comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entecavir in patients with chronic Hepatitis-B. Burden of congenital and hereditary anomalies and their epidemiological attributes in the pediatric and adult population of Peshawar valley, Pakistan. Clinical efficacy of Azadirachta indica based herbal mouthwash in treating the hypersensitivity of teeth. Clinical whole Exome Sequencing Reveals Novel Homozygous Missense Variant in the PMPCA Gene causing Autosomal Recessive Spinocerebellar Ataxia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1