定制渐进式弹力袜治疗职业性水肿的中期效果:随机对照试验

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1177/1358863X241290801
Sheng-Xing Wang, Wen-Tao Yang, Zhen-Yi Jin, Jia-Hao Wen, Hua-Liang Ren, Ying Xiong, Xiao-Ming Tao, Chun-Min Li
{"title":"定制渐进式弹力袜治疗职业性水肿的中期效果:随机对照试验","authors":"Sheng-Xing Wang, Wen-Tao Yang, Zhen-Yi Jin, Jia-Hao Wen, Hua-Liang Ren, Ying Xiong, Xiao-Ming Tao, Chun-Min Li","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241290801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study compared the effectiveness of customized graduated elastic compression stockings (c-GECS) based on individual lower-leg parameter models with standard graduated elastic compression stockings (s-GECS) in patients with occupational edema (OE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 70 patients with OE, randomly assigned to the c-GECS or s-GECS group. Follow-up assessments were performed at 1 and 3 months. Primary outcomes comprised visual analog scale scores (1-10) for lower-limb symptoms and comfort level of GECS. Secondary outcomes included GECS usage duration, calf volume, and interface pressure at B and C points (B: minimal ankle circumference point; C: maximum calf circumference point).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited significant improvements in pain, heaviness, and swelling symptoms at the 1- and 3-month follow up. At the 3-month follow up, the c-GECS group showed significantly superior improvement in symptoms. Comfort assessment revealed that c-GECS (16.2 ± 2.9) provided significantly greater comfort than s-GECS (13.6 ± 3.2) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the two groups showed no significant difference in GECS wear duration. At 3 months, the c-GECS group showed superior maintenance of stocking tension at point B (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Both types of GECS significantly reduced calf volume at both time points, with no notable difference between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>c-GECS effectively alleviated pain, heaviness, and swelling symptoms in patients with OE. Although c-GECS did not exhibit a clear advantage in reducing calf volume as compared to s-GECS, it provided more stable and enduring pressure, enhanced the overall fit of GECS, and improved comfort during wear. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry No. ChiCTR2100042894.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X241290801"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mid-term effect of customized graduated elastic compression stockings for managing occupational edema: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sheng-Xing Wang, Wen-Tao Yang, Zhen-Yi Jin, Jia-Hao Wen, Hua-Liang Ren, Ying Xiong, Xiao-Ming Tao, Chun-Min Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1358863X241290801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study compared the effectiveness of customized graduated elastic compression stockings (c-GECS) based on individual lower-leg parameter models with standard graduated elastic compression stockings (s-GECS) in patients with occupational edema (OE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 70 patients with OE, randomly assigned to the c-GECS or s-GECS group. Follow-up assessments were performed at 1 and 3 months. Primary outcomes comprised visual analog scale scores (1-10) for lower-limb symptoms and comfort level of GECS. Secondary outcomes included GECS usage duration, calf volume, and interface pressure at B and C points (B: minimal ankle circumference point; C: maximum calf circumference point).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited significant improvements in pain, heaviness, and swelling symptoms at the 1- and 3-month follow up. At the 3-month follow up, the c-GECS group showed significantly superior improvement in symptoms. Comfort assessment revealed that c-GECS (16.2 ± 2.9) provided significantly greater comfort than s-GECS (13.6 ± 3.2) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the two groups showed no significant difference in GECS wear duration. At 3 months, the c-GECS group showed superior maintenance of stocking tension at point B (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Both types of GECS significantly reduced calf volume at both time points, with no notable difference between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>c-GECS effectively alleviated pain, heaviness, and swelling symptoms in patients with OE. Although c-GECS did not exhibit a clear advantage in reducing calf volume as compared to s-GECS, it provided more stable and enduring pressure, enhanced the overall fit of GECS, and improved comfort during wear. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry No. ChiCTR2100042894.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1358863X241290801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241290801\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241290801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究比较了基于个体小腿参数模型的定制渐进式弹力袜(c-GECS)与标准渐进式弹力袜(s-GECS)对职业性水肿(OE)患者的疗效:对 70 名职业性水肿患者进行了单盲随机对照试验,随机分配到 c-GECS 组或 s-GECS 组。分别在 1 个月和 3 个月后进行随访评估。主要结果包括下肢症状视觉模拟量表评分(1-10 分)和 GECS 舒适度。次要结果包括使用 GECS 的持续时间、小腿体积以及 B 点和 C 点的界面压力(B:最小踝周点;C:最大小腿周点):在 1 个月和 3 个月的随访中,两组患者的疼痛、沉重感和肿胀症状均有明显改善。在 3 个月的随访中,c-GECS 组在症状改善方面明显更胜一筹。舒适度评估显示,c-GECS(16.2 ± 2.9)的舒适度明显高于 s-GECS(13.6 ± 3.2)(p < 0.001)。不过,两组在 GECS 佩戴时间上没有明显差异。3 个月后,c-GECS 组在 B 点的袜子张力保持率更优(p = 0.018)。结论:c-GECS 能有效缓解 OE 患者的疼痛、沉重感和肿胀症状。结论:c-GECS 能有效缓解 OE 患者的疼痛、沉重感和肿胀症状。虽然与 s-GECS 相比,c-GECS 在减少小腿体积方面没有明显优势,但它能提供更稳定、更持久的压力,增强了 GECS 的整体贴合度,提高了佩戴舒适度。中国临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2100042894。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mid-term effect of customized graduated elastic compression stockings for managing occupational edema: A randomized controlled trial.

Introduction: This study compared the effectiveness of customized graduated elastic compression stockings (c-GECS) based on individual lower-leg parameter models with standard graduated elastic compression stockings (s-GECS) in patients with occupational edema (OE).

Methods: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 70 patients with OE, randomly assigned to the c-GECS or s-GECS group. Follow-up assessments were performed at 1 and 3 months. Primary outcomes comprised visual analog scale scores (1-10) for lower-limb symptoms and comfort level of GECS. Secondary outcomes included GECS usage duration, calf volume, and interface pressure at B and C points (B: minimal ankle circumference point; C: maximum calf circumference point).

Results: Both groups exhibited significant improvements in pain, heaviness, and swelling symptoms at the 1- and 3-month follow up. At the 3-month follow up, the c-GECS group showed significantly superior improvement in symptoms. Comfort assessment revealed that c-GECS (16.2 ± 2.9) provided significantly greater comfort than s-GECS (13.6 ± 3.2) (p < 0.001). However, the two groups showed no significant difference in GECS wear duration. At 3 months, the c-GECS group showed superior maintenance of stocking tension at point B (p = 0.018). Both types of GECS significantly reduced calf volume at both time points, with no notable difference between the groups.

Conclusion: c-GECS effectively alleviated pain, heaviness, and swelling symptoms in patients with OE. Although c-GECS did not exhibit a clear advantage in reducing calf volume as compared to s-GECS, it provided more stable and enduring pressure, enhanced the overall fit of GECS, and improved comfort during wear. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry No. ChiCTR2100042894.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular Medicine
Vascular Medicine 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The premier, ISI-ranked journal of vascular medicine. Integrates the latest research in vascular biology with advancements for the practice of vascular medicine and vascular surgery. It features original research and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for vascular disease. A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with sustained improvement after peripheral vascular intervention in patients with claudication. High prevalence of breast arterial calcification in pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) - A nationwide study in the Netherlands. Predictors of incident stroke among individuals without coronary artery calcification: A pooled cohort analysis from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Jackson Heart Study, and Framingham Heart Study. The ankle-brachial index, gastrocnemius mitochondrial respirometry, and walking performance in people with and without peripheral artery disease. Evaluation of collateral circulation in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion: A clinical and ultrasonographic multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1