卡介苗(BCG)难治性非肌浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC):当前指南和临床实践经验。

IF 2 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Research and Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2024-11-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRU.S464068
Angelo Naselli, Giacomo Maria Pirola, Daniele Castellani
{"title":"卡介苗(BCG)难治性非肌浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC):当前指南和临床实践经验。","authors":"Angelo Naselli, Giacomo Maria Pirola, Daniele Castellani","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S464068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BCG is the standard of care for non-muscle invasive high-risk bladder cancer. Notwithstanding the high rate of cure, cancer may recur. A non-muscle invasive high-risk recurrence may be defined as BCG refractory or naïve. BCG refractory patients have been further divided into BCG unresponsive and BCG exposed. A recurrent high-risk bladder cancer within 1 year after BCG induction plus maintenance or two courses of BCG induction defines an unresponsive disease. Any recurrence after 24 months since induction and maintenance should be considered as BCG naïve. The remaining cases are BCG exposed. The standard of care for BCG exposed and naïve patients is another cycle of BCG in the first place, while radical cystectomy should be discussed as alternative with the patient. The preferred therapy for BCG unresponsive patients is radical cystectomy according to AUA or EAU guidelines. However, systemic immunotherapy with pembrolizumab or gene therapy with intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec may be administered for patients unfit or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy with outcomes superior to intravesical docetaxel, gemcitabine or valrubicin. Our narrative review tries to elucidate BCG refractory definition and treatment specifically regarding alternative therapies to radical cystectomy yet approved or under investigation. The last years have been exciting regarding new developments in this field after a long period of stagnation. Unfortunately, data available on some alternative therapies are mainly limited mainly to Phase I or II studies with a lack of robust evidence, but a clear trend in future treatments has just been drawn.</p>","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":"16 ","pages":"299-305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Refractory Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Angelo Naselli, Giacomo Maria Pirola, Daniele Castellani\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RRU.S464068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BCG is the standard of care for non-muscle invasive high-risk bladder cancer. Notwithstanding the high rate of cure, cancer may recur. A non-muscle invasive high-risk recurrence may be defined as BCG refractory or naïve. BCG refractory patients have been further divided into BCG unresponsive and BCG exposed. A recurrent high-risk bladder cancer within 1 year after BCG induction plus maintenance or two courses of BCG induction defines an unresponsive disease. Any recurrence after 24 months since induction and maintenance should be considered as BCG naïve. The remaining cases are BCG exposed. The standard of care for BCG exposed and naïve patients is another cycle of BCG in the first place, while radical cystectomy should be discussed as alternative with the patient. The preferred therapy for BCG unresponsive patients is radical cystectomy according to AUA or EAU guidelines. However, systemic immunotherapy with pembrolizumab or gene therapy with intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec may be administered for patients unfit or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy with outcomes superior to intravesical docetaxel, gemcitabine or valrubicin. Our narrative review tries to elucidate BCG refractory definition and treatment specifically regarding alternative therapies to radical cystectomy yet approved or under investigation. The last years have been exciting regarding new developments in this field after a long period of stagnation. Unfortunately, data available on some alternative therapies are mainly limited mainly to Phase I or II studies with a lack of robust evidence, but a clear trend in future treatments has just been drawn.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Reports in Urology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"299-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Reports in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S464068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S464068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡介苗是治疗非肌层浸润性高危膀胱癌的标准疗法。尽管治愈率很高,但癌症仍有可能复发。非肌层浸润性高危复发可定义为卡介苗难治性或天真型。卡介苗难治性患者又分为卡介苗无应答型和卡介苗暴露型。卡介苗诱导加维持治疗或两个卡介苗诱导疗程后 1 年内复发的高危膀胱癌定义为卡介苗无反应性疾病。诱导和维持治疗 24 个月后复发的病例应视为卡介苗无效。其余病例为卡介苗暴露型。卡介苗暴露和天真患者的标准治疗方法是首先接受另一周期的卡介苗治疗,同时应与患者讨论根治性膀胱切除术作为替代方案。根据 AUA 或 EAU 指南,卡介苗无反应患者的首选疗法是根治性膀胱切除术。然而,对于不适合或不愿意接受根治性膀胱切除术的患者,可以使用pembrolizumab进行全身免疫治疗,或使用膀胱内纳多巴酚丁胺进行基因治疗,其疗效优于膀胱内多西他赛、吉西他滨或瓦鲁比星。我们的叙述性综述试图阐明卡介苗难治性的定义和治疗方法,特别是关于根治性膀胱切除术的替代疗法,这些疗法尚未获得批准或正在研究中。在经历了长期的停滞后,过去几年该领域取得了令人振奋的新进展。遗憾的是,关于一些替代疗法的数据主要局限于I期或II期研究,缺乏有力的证据,但未来治疗的趋势已经非常明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Refractory Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice.

BCG is the standard of care for non-muscle invasive high-risk bladder cancer. Notwithstanding the high rate of cure, cancer may recur. A non-muscle invasive high-risk recurrence may be defined as BCG refractory or naïve. BCG refractory patients have been further divided into BCG unresponsive and BCG exposed. A recurrent high-risk bladder cancer within 1 year after BCG induction plus maintenance or two courses of BCG induction defines an unresponsive disease. Any recurrence after 24 months since induction and maintenance should be considered as BCG naïve. The remaining cases are BCG exposed. The standard of care for BCG exposed and naïve patients is another cycle of BCG in the first place, while radical cystectomy should be discussed as alternative with the patient. The preferred therapy for BCG unresponsive patients is radical cystectomy according to AUA or EAU guidelines. However, systemic immunotherapy with pembrolizumab or gene therapy with intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec may be administered for patients unfit or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy with outcomes superior to intravesical docetaxel, gemcitabine or valrubicin. Our narrative review tries to elucidate BCG refractory definition and treatment specifically regarding alternative therapies to radical cystectomy yet approved or under investigation. The last years have been exciting regarding new developments in this field after a long period of stagnation. Unfortunately, data available on some alternative therapies are mainly limited mainly to Phase I or II studies with a lack of robust evidence, but a clear trend in future treatments has just been drawn.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Urology
Research and Reports in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Immunohistochemistry for AMACR/p504s and p63 in Distinguishing Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostate Tissue Samples in Botswana. Knowledge of Male Infertility and Acceptance of Medical Assistance Reproductive Technology Among Fertile and Infertile Senegalese Men. Transperineal Drainage of Seminal Vesicle Abscess Under Local Anaesthetic: A Case Report. The Importance of Diagnostics in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in the United Kingdom. Appendicular Ureteroplasty for a Firearm Related Rupture of the Right Ureter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1