人工智能在前列腺癌中的应用:机器学习模型和神经网络在预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发方面的潜力。

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Indian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.4103/iju.iju_75_24
Gurpremjit Singh, Mayank Agrawal, Gagandeep Talwar, Sanket Kankaria, Gopal Sharma, Puneet Ahluwalia, Gagan Gautam
{"title":"人工智能在前列腺癌中的应用:机器学习模型和神经网络在预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发方面的潜力。","authors":"Gurpremjit Singh, Mayank Agrawal, Gagandeep Talwar, Sanket Kankaria, Gopal Sharma, Puneet Ahluwalia, Gagan Gautam","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_75_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of machine learning (ML) and neural network (NN) models versus traditional statistical methods for estimating biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RARP from November 2011 to July 2022 were taken in the study. Patients with BCR were assigned to Group 2, whereas those without BCR were placed in Group 1. Preoperative and postoperative parameters, together with demographic data, were recorded in the database. This study used one NN, the radial basis function NN (RBFNN), and two ML approaches, the K-nearest neighbor and XGboost ML models, to predict BCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the application of exclusion criteria, 516 patients were deemed eligible for the study. Of those, 234 (45.3%) developed BCR, and 282 (54.7%) did not. The results showed that the median follow-up period was 24 (15-42) months, and the median BCR diagnosis was 12.23 ± 15.58 months. The area under the curve (AUC) for the Cox proportional hazard analysis was 0.77. The receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the XGBoost and K closest neighbor models were 0.82 and 0.69, respectively. The RBFNN's AUC was 0.82.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The classical statistical model was outperformed by XGBoost and RBFNN models in predicting BCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"40 4","pages":"260-265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: The potential of machine learning models and neural networks to predict biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Gurpremjit Singh, Mayank Agrawal, Gagandeep Talwar, Sanket Kankaria, Gopal Sharma, Puneet Ahluwalia, Gagan Gautam\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/iju.iju_75_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of machine learning (ML) and neural network (NN) models versus traditional statistical methods for estimating biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RARP from November 2011 to July 2022 were taken in the study. Patients with BCR were assigned to Group 2, whereas those without BCR were placed in Group 1. Preoperative and postoperative parameters, together with demographic data, were recorded in the database. This study used one NN, the radial basis function NN (RBFNN), and two ML approaches, the K-nearest neighbor and XGboost ML models, to predict BCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the application of exclusion criteria, 516 patients were deemed eligible for the study. Of those, 234 (45.3%) developed BCR, and 282 (54.7%) did not. The results showed that the median follow-up period was 24 (15-42) months, and the median BCR diagnosis was 12.23 ± 15.58 months. The area under the curve (AUC) for the Cox proportional hazard analysis was 0.77. The receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the XGBoost and K closest neighbor models were 0.82 and 0.69, respectively. The RBFNN's AUC was 0.82.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The classical statistical model was outperformed by XGBoost and RBFNN models in predicting BCR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"260-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_75_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_75_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究旨在评估机器学习(ML)和神经网络(NN)模型与传统统计方法在估算机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)后男性生化复发率(BCR)方面的实用性:研究对象为2011年11月至2022年7月期间接受前列腺癌根治术的患者。术前和术后参数以及人口统计学数据均记录在数据库中。本研究使用了一种 NN(径向基函数 NN,RBFNN)和两种 ML 方法(K-近邻和 XGboost ML 模型)来预测 BCR:根据排除标准,516 名患者被认为符合研究条件。其中,234 例(45.3%)发展为 BCR,282 例(54.7%)未发展为 BCR。结果显示,随访时间的中位数为 24(15-42)个月,确诊 BCR 的中位数为 12.23 ± 15.58 个月。Cox 比例危险分析的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.77。XGBoost 模型和 K 近邻模型的接受者工作特征曲线(AUC)分别为 0.82 和 0.69。RBFNN的AUC为0.82:结论:经典统计模型在预测 BCR 方面优于 XGBoost 和 RBFNN 模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: The potential of machine learning models and neural networks to predict biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of machine learning (ML) and neural network (NN) models versus traditional statistical methods for estimating biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods: Patients who underwent RARP from November 2011 to July 2022 were taken in the study. Patients with BCR were assigned to Group 2, whereas those without BCR were placed in Group 1. Preoperative and postoperative parameters, together with demographic data, were recorded in the database. This study used one NN, the radial basis function NN (RBFNN), and two ML approaches, the K-nearest neighbor and XGboost ML models, to predict BCR.

Results: Following the application of exclusion criteria, 516 patients were deemed eligible for the study. Of those, 234 (45.3%) developed BCR, and 282 (54.7%) did not. The results showed that the median follow-up period was 24 (15-42) months, and the median BCR diagnosis was 12.23 ± 15.58 months. The area under the curve (AUC) for the Cox proportional hazard analysis was 0.77. The receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the XGBoost and K closest neighbor models were 0.82 and 0.69, respectively. The RBFNN's AUC was 0.82.

Conclusions: The classical statistical model was outperformed by XGBoost and RBFNN models in predicting BCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: The potential of machine learning models and neural networks to predict biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Author reply Re: Purushothaman J, Kalra S, Dorairajan LN, Selvarajan S, Sreerag KS, Aggarwal D. Intravesical bupivacaine in reducing catheter-related bladder discomfort and lower urinary tract symptoms after transurethral surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Urol 2024;40:161-6. Kidney-sparing management for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Where do we stand? Beyond the horizon: Immune checkpoint inhibitors reshaping the landscape of urothelial cancer. Can artificial intelligence aid the urologists in detecting bladder cancer?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1