一种新的生活方式体育活动量表:测量说明和干预响应性

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1177/15598276241300473
Julia Browne, Tate F Halverson, Cynthia L Battle, Michael D Stein, Alicia Bergeron, Ana M Abrantes
{"title":"一种新的生活方式体育活动量表:测量说明和干预响应性","authors":"Julia Browne, Tate F Halverson, Cynthia L Battle, Michael D Stein, Alicia Bergeron, Ana M Abrantes","doi":"10.1177/15598276241300473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lifestyle physical activity (LPA) interventions emphasize small bouts of movement that can be flexibly integrated into one's everyday routine. Despite research illustrating benefits for LPA on health outcomes, few LPA interventions and measurement tools have been developed and tested. The purpose of this study was to present a novel LPA self-report scale, including its content, scoring, and internal consistency reliability, and summarize its intervention responsiveness. The LPA scale was administered in a pilot randomized controlled trial that tested a 12-week LPA + Fitbit intervention against a health education (HE) control (matched to LPA + Fitbit on contact time) in a sample of 50 women with depression in alcohol treatment. The LPA scale includes 22 items covering five domains relevant to LPA. Results demonstrated good internal consistency reliability for the total score (ω = 0.84) but poor-to-acceptable internal consistency reliability for the domain scores (ω range: 0.43-0.80). Participants randomized to the LPA + Fitbit intervention had significantly greater improvements in the LPA total score and two domain scores compared to HE participants. Overall, results demonstrate good internal consistency reliability and intervention responsiveness of the LPA scale total score. A larger, more comprehensive psychometric evaluation is needed for validation of this scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":47480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"15598276241300473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Scale of Lifestyle Physical Activity: Measure Description and Intervention Responsiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Browne, Tate F Halverson, Cynthia L Battle, Michael D Stein, Alicia Bergeron, Ana M Abrantes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15598276241300473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lifestyle physical activity (LPA) interventions emphasize small bouts of movement that can be flexibly integrated into one's everyday routine. Despite research illustrating benefits for LPA on health outcomes, few LPA interventions and measurement tools have been developed and tested. The purpose of this study was to present a novel LPA self-report scale, including its content, scoring, and internal consistency reliability, and summarize its intervention responsiveness. The LPA scale was administered in a pilot randomized controlled trial that tested a 12-week LPA + Fitbit intervention against a health education (HE) control (matched to LPA + Fitbit on contact time) in a sample of 50 women with depression in alcohol treatment. The LPA scale includes 22 items covering five domains relevant to LPA. Results demonstrated good internal consistency reliability for the total score (ω = 0.84) but poor-to-acceptable internal consistency reliability for the domain scores (ω range: 0.43-0.80). Participants randomized to the LPA + Fitbit intervention had significantly greater improvements in the LPA total score and two domain scores compared to HE participants. Overall, results demonstrate good internal consistency reliability and intervention responsiveness of the LPA scale total score. A larger, more comprehensive psychometric evaluation is needed for validation of this scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15598276241300473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241300473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241300473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生活方式体育锻炼(LPA)干预措施强调可灵活融入日常生活的小范围运动。尽管有研究表明 LPA 对健康结果有益,但很少有 LPA 干预措施和测量工具被开发和测试出来。本研究旨在介绍一种新型 LPA 自我报告量表,包括其内容、评分和内部一致性可靠性,并总结其干预响应性。LPA 量表是在一项试点随机对照试验中使用的,该试验以 50 名接受酒精治疗的女性抑郁症患者为样本,测试了为期 12 周的 LPA + Fitbit 干预与健康教育(HE)对照(在接触时间上与 LPA + Fitbit 匹配)。LPA 量表包括 22 个项目,涵盖与 LPA 相关的五个领域。结果表明,总分的内部一致性可靠性良好(ω = 0.84),但各领域得分的内部一致性可靠性较差(ω范围:0.43-0.80)。与 HE 参与者相比,随机接受 LPA + Fitbit 干预的参与者在 LPA 总分和两个领域得分方面的改善幅度更大。总体而言,结果表明 LPA 量表总分具有良好的内部一致性可靠性和干预反应性。为了验证该量表,需要进行更大规模、更全面的心理测量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel Scale of Lifestyle Physical Activity: Measure Description and Intervention Responsiveness.

Lifestyle physical activity (LPA) interventions emphasize small bouts of movement that can be flexibly integrated into one's everyday routine. Despite research illustrating benefits for LPA on health outcomes, few LPA interventions and measurement tools have been developed and tested. The purpose of this study was to present a novel LPA self-report scale, including its content, scoring, and internal consistency reliability, and summarize its intervention responsiveness. The LPA scale was administered in a pilot randomized controlled trial that tested a 12-week LPA + Fitbit intervention against a health education (HE) control (matched to LPA + Fitbit on contact time) in a sample of 50 women with depression in alcohol treatment. The LPA scale includes 22 items covering five domains relevant to LPA. Results demonstrated good internal consistency reliability for the total score (ω = 0.84) but poor-to-acceptable internal consistency reliability for the domain scores (ω range: 0.43-0.80). Participants randomized to the LPA + Fitbit intervention had significantly greater improvements in the LPA total score and two domain scores compared to HE participants. Overall, results demonstrate good internal consistency reliability and intervention responsiveness of the LPA scale total score. A larger, more comprehensive psychometric evaluation is needed for validation of this scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
119
期刊最新文献
Health and Well-Being Coaching Adjuvant to GLP-1 Induced Weight Loss. Habit Formation in Older Adults. Impact of Physicians' Perception of Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) on the Practice of Lifestyle Medicine. Findings From a Family Physicians Survey. Recovery Horizons: Nature-Based Activities as Adjunctive Treatments for Co-Occurring Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorders. A Novel Scale of Lifestyle Physical Activity: Measure Description and Intervention Responsiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1