基于认知和深度学习的图标相似性模型

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE Displays Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.displa.2024.102864
Linlin Wang, Yixuan Zou, Haiyan Wang, Chengqi Xue
{"title":"基于认知和深度学习的图标相似性模型","authors":"Linlin Wang,&nbsp;Yixuan Zou,&nbsp;Haiyan Wang,&nbsp;Chengqi Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.displa.2024.102864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human-computer cooperation guided by natural interaction, intelligent interaction, and human–computer integration is gradually becoming a new trend in human–computer interfaces. An icon is an indispensable pictographic symbol in an interface that can convey pivotal semantics between humans and computers. Research on similar icons’ cognition in humans and the discrimination of computers can reduce misunderstandings and facilitate transparent cooperation. Therefore, this research focuses on images of icons, extracted contours, and four features, including the curvature, proportion, orientation, and line of the contour, step by step. By manipulating the feature value change to obtain 360 similar icons, a cognitive experiment was conducted with 25 participants to explore the boundary values of the feature dimensions that cause different levels of similarity. Its boundary values were applied to deep learning to train a discrimination algorithm model that included 1500 similar icons. This dataset was used to train a Siamese neural network using a 16-layer network branch of a visual geometry group. The training process used stochastic gradient descent. This method of combining human cognition and deep learning technology is meaningful for establishing a consensus on icon semantics, including content and emotions, by outputting similarity levels and values. Taking icon similarity discrimination as an example, this study explored the analysis and simulation methods of computer vision for human visual cognition. The accuracy evaluated is 90.82%. The precision was evaluated as 90% for high, 80.65% for medium, and 97.30% for low. Recall was evaluated as 100% for high, 89.29% for medium, and 83.72% for low. It has been verified that it can compensate for fuzzy cognition in humans and enable computers to cooperate efficiently.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50570,"journal":{"name":"Displays","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102864"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Icon similarity model based on cognition and deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Linlin Wang,&nbsp;Yixuan Zou,&nbsp;Haiyan Wang,&nbsp;Chengqi Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.displa.2024.102864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Human-computer cooperation guided by natural interaction, intelligent interaction, and human–computer integration is gradually becoming a new trend in human–computer interfaces. An icon is an indispensable pictographic symbol in an interface that can convey pivotal semantics between humans and computers. Research on similar icons’ cognition in humans and the discrimination of computers can reduce misunderstandings and facilitate transparent cooperation. Therefore, this research focuses on images of icons, extracted contours, and four features, including the curvature, proportion, orientation, and line of the contour, step by step. By manipulating the feature value change to obtain 360 similar icons, a cognitive experiment was conducted with 25 participants to explore the boundary values of the feature dimensions that cause different levels of similarity. Its boundary values were applied to deep learning to train a discrimination algorithm model that included 1500 similar icons. This dataset was used to train a Siamese neural network using a 16-layer network branch of a visual geometry group. The training process used stochastic gradient descent. This method of combining human cognition and deep learning technology is meaningful for establishing a consensus on icon semantics, including content and emotions, by outputting similarity levels and values. Taking icon similarity discrimination as an example, this study explored the analysis and simulation methods of computer vision for human visual cognition. The accuracy evaluated is 90.82%. The precision was evaluated as 90% for high, 80.65% for medium, and 97.30% for low. Recall was evaluated as 100% for high, 89.29% for medium, and 83.72% for low. It has been verified that it can compensate for fuzzy cognition in humans and enable computers to cooperate efficiently.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Displays\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Displays\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141938224002282\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Displays","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141938224002282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以自然交互、智能交互、人机融合为指导的人机合作逐渐成为人机界面的新趋势。图标是界面中不可或缺的图形符号,可以传达人机之间的重要语义。研究人类对类似图标的认知和计算机的辨别,可以减少误解,促进透明的合作。因此,本研究将重点放在图标图像、提取的轮廓和轮廓的曲率、比例、方向和线条等四个特征上,逐步进行研究。通过操纵特征值变化获得 360 个相似图标,并对 25 名参与者进行了认知实验,以探索导致不同相似度的特征维度的边界值。其边界值被应用于深度学习,以训练一个包含 1500 个相似图标的判别算法模型。该数据集被用于使用视觉几何组的 16 层网络分支训练连体神经网络。训练过程采用随机梯度下降法。这种将人类认知与深度学习技术相结合的方法对于通过输出相似度等级和数值,就图标语义(包括内容和情感)达成共识很有意义。本研究以图标相似性判别为例,探索了计算机视觉对人类视觉认知的分析和模拟方法。评估的准确率为 90.82%。高精确度为 90%,中精确度为 80.65%,低精确度为 97.30%。高召回率为 100%,中召回率为 89.29%,低召回率为 83.72%。经验证,它可以弥补人类的模糊认知,并使计算机能够高效合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Icon similarity model based on cognition and deep learning
Human-computer cooperation guided by natural interaction, intelligent interaction, and human–computer integration is gradually becoming a new trend in human–computer interfaces. An icon is an indispensable pictographic symbol in an interface that can convey pivotal semantics between humans and computers. Research on similar icons’ cognition in humans and the discrimination of computers can reduce misunderstandings and facilitate transparent cooperation. Therefore, this research focuses on images of icons, extracted contours, and four features, including the curvature, proportion, orientation, and line of the contour, step by step. By manipulating the feature value change to obtain 360 similar icons, a cognitive experiment was conducted with 25 participants to explore the boundary values of the feature dimensions that cause different levels of similarity. Its boundary values were applied to deep learning to train a discrimination algorithm model that included 1500 similar icons. This dataset was used to train a Siamese neural network using a 16-layer network branch of a visual geometry group. The training process used stochastic gradient descent. This method of combining human cognition and deep learning technology is meaningful for establishing a consensus on icon semantics, including content and emotions, by outputting similarity levels and values. Taking icon similarity discrimination as an example, this study explored the analysis and simulation methods of computer vision for human visual cognition. The accuracy evaluated is 90.82%. The precision was evaluated as 90% for high, 80.65% for medium, and 97.30% for low. Recall was evaluated as 100% for high, 89.29% for medium, and 83.72% for low. It has been verified that it can compensate for fuzzy cognition in humans and enable computers to cooperate efficiently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Displays
Displays 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
25.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Displays is the international journal covering the research and development of display technology, its effective presentation and perception of information, and applications and systems including display-human interface. Technical papers on practical developments in Displays technology provide an effective channel to promote greater understanding and cross-fertilization across the diverse disciplines of the Displays community. Original research papers solving ergonomics issues at the display-human interface advance effective presentation of information. Tutorial papers covering fundamentals intended for display technologies and human factor engineers new to the field will also occasionally featured.
期刊最新文献
DHDP-SLAM: Dynamic Hierarchical Dirichlet Process based data association for semantic SLAM Fabrication and Reflow of Indium Bumps for Active-Matrix Micro-LED Display of 3175 PPI Perceptually-calibrated synergy network for night-time image quality assessment with enhancement booster and knowledge cross-sharing High performance A-PWM μLED pixel circuit design using double gate oxide TFTs Frequency-spatial interaction network for gaze estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1