Sana Malik , Faiza Akram , Muhammad Ali , Mohsin Javed , Rana Muhammad Mateen , Ammar Zidan , Ali Bahadur , Shahid Iqbal , Sajid Mahmood , Abd-ElAziem Farouk , Salman Aloufi
{"title":"揭示法定人数感应机制:细菌受体和配体的计算对接与动力学","authors":"Sana Malik , Faiza Akram , Muhammad Ali , Mohsin Javed , Rana Muhammad Mateen , Ammar Zidan , Ali Bahadur , Shahid Iqbal , Sajid Mahmood , Abd-ElAziem Farouk , Salman Aloufi","doi":"10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.140730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The bacterial cell-to-cell communication mechanism known as quorum sensing (QS) uses chemical cues called autoinducers (AIs) to control several processes, including pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance, and biofilm formation. This study investigates the QS receptor-ligand interactions and QS compatibility within and between bacterial species using computational molecular docking. Receptor proteins including LuxS, LuxP, AgrC, LuxN, SdiA, LasR, esaR, YenR, LamC, PlcR, and TraR were docked with their respective AIs (AHL, AI-1, AI-2, AIP1, LamD, PapR7) in both biofilm and non-biofilm producing bacteria. Our findings indicate that QS receptors exhibit high affinity for their cognate ligands, with binding affinities ≥ -4.5 Kcal/mol. Additionally, Zinc Pharmar-derived similar chemical structures demonstrated binding affinities ≥ -5.3 Kcal/mol. Density Functional Theory (DFT) analysis revealed AI-2 as the most reactive autoinducer. Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations confirmed the stability of LasR-AHL and LuxP-AI-2 complexes. These insights pave the way for further <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> investigations of QS mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Structure","volume":"1323 ","pages":"Article 140730"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling quorum sensing mechanisms: Computational docking and dynamics of bacterial receptors and ligands\",\"authors\":\"Sana Malik , Faiza Akram , Muhammad Ali , Mohsin Javed , Rana Muhammad Mateen , Ammar Zidan , Ali Bahadur , Shahid Iqbal , Sajid Mahmood , Abd-ElAziem Farouk , Salman Aloufi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.140730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The bacterial cell-to-cell communication mechanism known as quorum sensing (QS) uses chemical cues called autoinducers (AIs) to control several processes, including pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance, and biofilm formation. This study investigates the QS receptor-ligand interactions and QS compatibility within and between bacterial species using computational molecular docking. Receptor proteins including LuxS, LuxP, AgrC, LuxN, SdiA, LasR, esaR, YenR, LamC, PlcR, and TraR were docked with their respective AIs (AHL, AI-1, AI-2, AIP1, LamD, PapR7) in both biofilm and non-biofilm producing bacteria. Our findings indicate that QS receptors exhibit high affinity for their cognate ligands, with binding affinities ≥ -4.5 Kcal/mol. Additionally, Zinc Pharmar-derived similar chemical structures demonstrated binding affinities ≥ -5.3 Kcal/mol. Density Functional Theory (DFT) analysis revealed AI-2 as the most reactive autoinducer. Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations confirmed the stability of LasR-AHL and LuxP-AI-2 complexes. These insights pave the way for further <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> investigations of QS mechanisms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Structure\",\"volume\":\"1323 \",\"pages\":\"Article 140730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Structure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022286024032381\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Structure","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022286024032381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unveiling quorum sensing mechanisms: Computational docking and dynamics of bacterial receptors and ligands
The bacterial cell-to-cell communication mechanism known as quorum sensing (QS) uses chemical cues called autoinducers (AIs) to control several processes, including pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance, and biofilm formation. This study investigates the QS receptor-ligand interactions and QS compatibility within and between bacterial species using computational molecular docking. Receptor proteins including LuxS, LuxP, AgrC, LuxN, SdiA, LasR, esaR, YenR, LamC, PlcR, and TraR were docked with their respective AIs (AHL, AI-1, AI-2, AIP1, LamD, PapR7) in both biofilm and non-biofilm producing bacteria. Our findings indicate that QS receptors exhibit high affinity for their cognate ligands, with binding affinities ≥ -4.5 Kcal/mol. Additionally, Zinc Pharmar-derived similar chemical structures demonstrated binding affinities ≥ -5.3 Kcal/mol. Density Functional Theory (DFT) analysis revealed AI-2 as the most reactive autoinducer. Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations confirmed the stability of LasR-AHL and LuxP-AI-2 complexes. These insights pave the way for further in vitro and in vivo investigations of QS mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Structure is dedicated to the publication of full-length articles and review papers, providing important new structural information on all types of chemical species including:
• Stable and unstable molecules in all types of environments (vapour, molecular beam, liquid, solution, liquid crystal, solid state, matrix-isolated, surface-absorbed etc.)
• Chemical intermediates
• Molecules in excited states
• Biological molecules
• Polymers.
The methods used may include any combination of spectroscopic and non-spectroscopic techniques, for example:
• Infrared spectroscopy (mid, far, near)
• Raman spectroscopy and non-linear Raman methods (CARS, etc.)
• Electronic absorption spectroscopy
• Optical rotatory dispersion and circular dichroism
• Fluorescence and phosphorescence techniques
• Electron spectroscopies (PES, XPS), EXAFS, etc.
• Microwave spectroscopy
• Electron diffraction
• NMR and ESR spectroscopies
• Mössbauer spectroscopy
• X-ray crystallography
• Charge Density Analyses
• Computational Studies (supplementing experimental methods)
We encourage publications combining theoretical and experimental approaches. The structural insights gained by the studies should be correlated with the properties, activity and/ or reactivity of the molecule under investigation and the relevance of this molecule and its implications should be discussed.