驾驶员的认知负荷和任务切换:半自动驾驶车辆对道路安全的影响

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.11.005
Jinhui Xu , Mohammad Fard , Neng Zhang , John L. Davy , Stephen R. Robinson
{"title":"驾驶员的认知负荷和任务切换:半自动驾驶车辆对道路安全的影响","authors":"Jinhui Xu ,&nbsp;Mohammad Fard ,&nbsp;Neng Zhang ,&nbsp;John L. Davy ,&nbsp;Stephen R. Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the semi-automation of motor vehicles advances, the prevalence of multitasking and task switching while driving has increased. In the next phase, known as conditional automated driving (level 3 automation), drivers will be able to fully engage in distracting tasks, yet they must be prepared to promptly resume control of the vehicle and maintain safe driving if requested to by the vehicle. In such situations, the driver’s ability to flawlessly switch between the distracting task and the driving task becomes vitally important. This narrative review discusses conditional automated driving within the framework of cognitive psychology concepts of attention and task switching. Delayed reaction time and deteriorated driving performance are attributed to cognitive overload and switch cost. Factors that contribute to driving switch cost are identified and categorized, and several road safety concerns are raised, including: i) switch cost may last for between 20<!--> <!--> s to 5 min; ii) inexperienced drivers may be unable to adequately control the vehicle after resuming manual control; and iii) low- and high-intensity non-driving tasks have a greater impact on takeover performance. To minimise the risk to road safety, suggestions have been provided to vehicle manufacturers, road users and regulatory authorities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 1175-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive load and task switching in drivers: Implications for road safety in semi-autonomous vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Jinhui Xu ,&nbsp;Mohammad Fard ,&nbsp;Neng Zhang ,&nbsp;John L. Davy ,&nbsp;Stephen R. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the semi-automation of motor vehicles advances, the prevalence of multitasking and task switching while driving has increased. In the next phase, known as conditional automated driving (level 3 automation), drivers will be able to fully engage in distracting tasks, yet they must be prepared to promptly resume control of the vehicle and maintain safe driving if requested to by the vehicle. In such situations, the driver’s ability to flawlessly switch between the distracting task and the driving task becomes vitally important. This narrative review discusses conditional automated driving within the framework of cognitive psychology concepts of attention and task switching. Delayed reaction time and deteriorated driving performance are attributed to cognitive overload and switch cost. Factors that contribute to driving switch cost are identified and categorized, and several road safety concerns are raised, including: i) switch cost may last for between 20<!--> <!--> s to 5 min; ii) inexperienced drivers may be unable to adequately control the vehicle after resuming manual control; and iii) low- and high-intensity non-driving tasks have a greater impact on takeover performance. To minimise the risk to road safety, suggestions have been provided to vehicle manufacturers, road users and regulatory authorities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1175-1197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着机动车半自动化进程的推进,驾驶时进行多任务处理和任务切换的情况越来越普遍。在下一阶段,即所谓的有条件自动驾驶(3 级自动驾驶),驾驶员将能够完全投入到分散注意力的任务中,但他们必须做好准备,在车辆提出要求时及时恢复对车辆的控制并保持安全驾驶。在这种情况下,驾驶员在分心任务和驾驶任务之间完美切换的能力就变得至关重要。本综述将在注意力和任务切换的认知心理学概念框架内讨论有条件自动驾驶。反应时间延迟和驾驶性能下降归因于认知超载和切换成本。对造成驾驶切换成本的因素进行了识别和分类,并提出了一些道路安全问题,包括:i) 切换成本可能持续 20 秒至 5 分钟;ii) 缺乏经验的驾驶员在恢复手动控制后可能无法充分控制车辆;iii) 低强度和高强度的非驾驶任务对接管性能的影响更大。为最大限度地降低道路安全风险,已向汽车制造商、道路使用者和监管机构提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive load and task switching in drivers: Implications for road safety in semi-autonomous vehicles
As the semi-automation of motor vehicles advances, the prevalence of multitasking and task switching while driving has increased. In the next phase, known as conditional automated driving (level 3 automation), drivers will be able to fully engage in distracting tasks, yet they must be prepared to promptly resume control of the vehicle and maintain safe driving if requested to by the vehicle. In such situations, the driver’s ability to flawlessly switch between the distracting task and the driving task becomes vitally important. This narrative review discusses conditional automated driving within the framework of cognitive psychology concepts of attention and task switching. Delayed reaction time and deteriorated driving performance are attributed to cognitive overload and switch cost. Factors that contribute to driving switch cost are identified and categorized, and several road safety concerns are raised, including: i) switch cost may last for between 20  s to 5 min; ii) inexperienced drivers may be unable to adequately control the vehicle after resuming manual control; and iii) low- and high-intensity non-driving tasks have a greater impact on takeover performance. To minimise the risk to road safety, suggestions have been provided to vehicle manufacturers, road users and regulatory authorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Understanding car-sharing by integrating long-, medium- and short-term cognitions High-speed curve negotiation: Can differences in expertise account for the different effects of cognitive load? Description and analysis of aberrant riding behaviors of pedal cyclists, e-bike riders and motorcyclists: Based on a self-report questionnaire The role of emotional coherence in electric vehicle purchasing decisions Incorporating personality traits for the study of user acceptance of electric micromobility-sharing services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1