西司他丁对急性肾损伤高危人群的肾保护作用:系统回顾与元分析

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100913
Dilaram Acharya , Fanar Ghanim , Tyrone G. Harrison , Tayler Dawn Scory , Nusrat Shommu , Paul E. Ronksley , Meghan J. Elliott , David Collister , Neesh Pannu , Matthew T. James
{"title":"西司他丁对急性肾损伤高危人群的肾保护作用:系统回顾与元分析","authors":"Dilaram Acharya ,&nbsp;Fanar Ghanim ,&nbsp;Tyrone G. Harrison ,&nbsp;Tayler Dawn Scory ,&nbsp;Nusrat Shommu ,&nbsp;Paul E. Ronksley ,&nbsp;Meghan J. Elliott ,&nbsp;David Collister ,&nbsp;Neesh Pannu ,&nbsp;Matthew T. James","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Cilastatin is an inhibitor of drug metabolism in the proximal tubule that demonstrates nephroprotective effects in animals. It has been used in humans in combination with the antibiotic imipenem to block imipenem’s renal metabolism. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the nephroprotective effects of cilastatin in humans.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational (comparative effectiveness) studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Study Populations</h3><div>People of any age at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).</div></div><div><h3>Selection Criteria for Studies</h3><div>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials registry from database inception to November 2023 for observational studies or RCTs that compared kidney outcomes among groups treated with cilastatin, either alone or as combination imipenem-cilastatin, versus an inactive or active control group not treated with cilastatin.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Treatment effects were estimated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was quantified using the <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> statistic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 10 studies (5 RCTs, n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->531<!--> <!-->patients; 5 observational studies, n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6,321 participants) that met the inclusion criteria, including 4 studies with comparisons to inactive controls and 6 studies with comparisons to alternate antibiotics. Based on pooled results from 7 studies, the risk of AKI was lower with imipenem-cilastatin (risk ratio [RR], 0.52; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.40-0.67; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->26.5%), with consistent results observed in RCTs (3 RCTs, RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.77; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44.4%) and observational studies (4 studies, RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.72; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44.4%). Based on results from 6 studies, serum creatinine concentration was lower following treatment with imipenem-cilastatin than comparators (weighted mean difference in serum creatinine<!--> <!-->−0.14 mg/dL (95% CI, −0.21 to<!--> <!-->−0.07; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0%). The overall certainty of the evidence was low due to heterogeneity of the results, high risk of bias, and indirectness among the identified studies.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Clinical and statistical heterogeneity could not be fully explained due to a limited number of studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients treated with imipenem-cilastatin developed AKI less frequently and had lower serum creatinine concentration following treatment than control groups or those who had received comparator antibiotics. Larger clinical trials with less risk of detection bias due to lack of allocation concealment and blinding are needed to establish the efficacy of cilastatin for AKI prevention.</div></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><div>Cilastatin, used with the antibiotic imipenem, has shown kidney-protective effects in animals and preclinical studies of acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review and meta-analysis identified 10 studies (5 randomized controlled trials and 5 observational studies) of imipenem-cilastatin involving people at risk of AKI. Pooled estimates of treatment effects indicated that patients who received imipenem-cilastatin had a lower incidence of AKI and lower serum creatinine concentrations following treatment compared to comparator groups. Despite these promising findings, the overall certainty of the evidence was low due to heterogeneity among studies, high risk of bias, and indirectness of the data. Although cilastatin appears to be a promising medication for preventing AKI, larger, well-designed trials are needed to establish its effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 12","pages":"Article 100913"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nephroprotective Effects of Cilastatin in People at Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Dilaram Acharya ,&nbsp;Fanar Ghanim ,&nbsp;Tyrone G. Harrison ,&nbsp;Tayler Dawn Scory ,&nbsp;Nusrat Shommu ,&nbsp;Paul E. Ronksley ,&nbsp;Meghan J. Elliott ,&nbsp;David Collister ,&nbsp;Neesh Pannu ,&nbsp;Matthew T. James\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Cilastatin is an inhibitor of drug metabolism in the proximal tubule that demonstrates nephroprotective effects in animals. It has been used in humans in combination with the antibiotic imipenem to block imipenem’s renal metabolism. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the nephroprotective effects of cilastatin in humans.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational (comparative effectiveness) studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Study Populations</h3><div>People of any age at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).</div></div><div><h3>Selection Criteria for Studies</h3><div>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials registry from database inception to November 2023 for observational studies or RCTs that compared kidney outcomes among groups treated with cilastatin, either alone or as combination imipenem-cilastatin, versus an inactive or active control group not treated with cilastatin.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Treatment effects were estimated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was quantified using the <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> statistic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 10 studies (5 RCTs, n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->531<!--> <!-->patients; 5 observational studies, n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6,321 participants) that met the inclusion criteria, including 4 studies with comparisons to inactive controls and 6 studies with comparisons to alternate antibiotics. Based on pooled results from 7 studies, the risk of AKI was lower with imipenem-cilastatin (risk ratio [RR], 0.52; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.40-0.67; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->26.5%), with consistent results observed in RCTs (3 RCTs, RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.77; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44.4%) and observational studies (4 studies, RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.72; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44.4%). Based on results from 6 studies, serum creatinine concentration was lower following treatment with imipenem-cilastatin than comparators (weighted mean difference in serum creatinine<!--> <!-->−0.14 mg/dL (95% CI, −0.21 to<!--> <!-->−0.07; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0%). The overall certainty of the evidence was low due to heterogeneity of the results, high risk of bias, and indirectness among the identified studies.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Clinical and statistical heterogeneity could not be fully explained due to a limited number of studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients treated with imipenem-cilastatin developed AKI less frequently and had lower serum creatinine concentration following treatment than control groups or those who had received comparator antibiotics. Larger clinical trials with less risk of detection bias due to lack of allocation concealment and blinding are needed to establish the efficacy of cilastatin for AKI prevention.</div></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><div>Cilastatin, used with the antibiotic imipenem, has shown kidney-protective effects in animals and preclinical studies of acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review and meta-analysis identified 10 studies (5 randomized controlled trials and 5 observational studies) of imipenem-cilastatin involving people at risk of AKI. Pooled estimates of treatment effects indicated that patients who received imipenem-cilastatin had a lower incidence of AKI and lower serum creatinine concentrations following treatment compared to comparator groups. Despite these promising findings, the overall certainty of the evidence was low due to heterogeneity among studies, high risk of bias, and indirectness of the data. Although cilastatin appears to be a promising medication for preventing AKI, larger, well-designed trials are needed to establish its effectiveness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 100913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524001249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524001249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由与amp; 目的西司他丁是一种近端肾小管药物代谢抑制剂,在动物体内具有保护肾脏的作用。在人体中,它与抗生素亚胺培南联合使用,可阻断亚胺培南的肾脏代谢。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了西司他丁对人类肾脏的保护作用。研究设计系统综述和荟萃分析观察性(比较效应)研究或随机临床试验(RCT)。研究的筛选标准我们系统地检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane对照试验登记系统中从数据库开始到2023年11月的所有研究,以寻找对单用西司他丁或亚胺培南-西司他丁联合治疗组与未用西司他丁治疗的非活性或活性对照组的肾脏结果进行比较的观察性研究或RCT。结果我们确定了10项符合纳入标准的研究(5项RCT,n=531名患者;5项观察性研究,n=6321名参与者),其中包括4项与非活性对照组进行比较的研究和6项与替代抗生素进行比较的研究。根据 7 项研究的汇总结果,亚胺培南-西司他丁的 AKI 风险较低(风险比 [RR],0.52;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.40-0.67;I2 = 26.5%),在 RCT(3 项 RCT,RR,0.26;95% CI,0.09-0.77;I2 = 44.4%)和观察性研究(4 项研究,RR,0.54;95% CI,0.41-0.72;I2 = 44.4%)中观察到的结果一致。根据6项研究的结果,使用亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗后,血清肌酐浓度低于对照组(血清肌酐的加权平均差异为-0.14 mg/dL (95% CI, -0.21 to -0.07;I2 = 0%)。结论与对照组或接受了对比抗生素治疗的患者相比,接受亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗的患者发生AKI的频率较低,治疗后血清肌酐浓度也较低。为确定西司他丁预防 AKI 的疗效,需要进行更大规模的临床试验,以降低因缺乏分配隐藏和盲法而导致的检测偏倚风险。本系统综述和荟萃分析确定了 10 项亚胺培南-西司他丁研究(5 项随机对照试验和 5 项观察性研究),涉及有 AKI 风险的人群。对治疗效果的汇总估计表明,与对比组相比,接受亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗的患者的 AKI 发生率较低,治疗后血清肌酐浓度也较低。尽管这些研究结果很有希望,但由于研究之间存在异质性、高偏倚风险以及数据的间接性,证据的总体确定性较低。尽管西司他丁似乎是一种很有前景的预防 AKI 的药物,但还需要更大规模、设计合理的试验来确定其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nephroprotective Effects of Cilastatin in People at Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rationale & Objective

Cilastatin is an inhibitor of drug metabolism in the proximal tubule that demonstrates nephroprotective effects in animals. It has been used in humans in combination with the antibiotic imipenem to block imipenem’s renal metabolism. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the nephroprotective effects of cilastatin in humans.

Study Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational (comparative effectiveness) studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Setting & Study Populations

People of any age at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).

Selection Criteria for Studies

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials registry from database inception to November 2023 for observational studies or RCTs that compared kidney outcomes among groups treated with cilastatin, either alone or as combination imipenem-cilastatin, versus an inactive or active control group not treated with cilastatin.

Data Extraction

Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and risk of bias.

Analytical Approach

Treatment effects were estimated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic.

Results

We identified 10 studies (5 RCTs, n = 531 patients; 5 observational studies, n = 6,321 participants) that met the inclusion criteria, including 4 studies with comparisons to inactive controls and 6 studies with comparisons to alternate antibiotics. Based on pooled results from 7 studies, the risk of AKI was lower with imipenem-cilastatin (risk ratio [RR], 0.52; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.40-0.67; I2 = 26.5%), with consistent results observed in RCTs (3 RCTs, RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.77; I2 = 44.4%) and observational studies (4 studies, RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.72; I2 = 44.4%). Based on results from 6 studies, serum creatinine concentration was lower following treatment with imipenem-cilastatin than comparators (weighted mean difference in serum creatinine −0.14 mg/dL (95% CI, −0.21 to −0.07; I2 = 0%). The overall certainty of the evidence was low due to heterogeneity of the results, high risk of bias, and indirectness among the identified studies.

Limitations

Clinical and statistical heterogeneity could not be fully explained due to a limited number of studies.

Conclusions

Patients treated with imipenem-cilastatin developed AKI less frequently and had lower serum creatinine concentration following treatment than control groups or those who had received comparator antibiotics. Larger clinical trials with less risk of detection bias due to lack of allocation concealment and blinding are needed to establish the efficacy of cilastatin for AKI prevention.

Plain-Language Summary

Cilastatin, used with the antibiotic imipenem, has shown kidney-protective effects in animals and preclinical studies of acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review and meta-analysis identified 10 studies (5 randomized controlled trials and 5 observational studies) of imipenem-cilastatin involving people at risk of AKI. Pooled estimates of treatment effects indicated that patients who received imipenem-cilastatin had a lower incidence of AKI and lower serum creatinine concentrations following treatment compared to comparator groups. Despite these promising findings, the overall certainty of the evidence was low due to heterogeneity among studies, high risk of bias, and indirectness of the data. Although cilastatin appears to be a promising medication for preventing AKI, larger, well-designed trials are needed to establish its effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Living Donor Candidates’ Self-reported Health and Health Perceptions and Completion of Donor Evaluation: A Cohort Study Insulin Resistance in Hypercalciuric Calcium Kidney Stone Patients Methotrexate Crystals on Electron Microscopy of Kidney Biopsy for Acute Kidney Injury Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury Care: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians Undetected Air Embolism During Hemodialysis from a Defective Central Venous Catheter Causing Intradialytic Cardiac Arrest: An Imaging Teaching Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1