仙女座:安全评估和保证的模型连接框架

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Journal of Systems and Software Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112256
Athanasios Retouniotis , Yiannis Papadopoulos , Ioannis Sorokos
{"title":"仙女座:安全评估和保证的模型连接框架","authors":"Athanasios Retouniotis ,&nbsp;Yiannis Papadopoulos ,&nbsp;Ioannis Sorokos","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Safety is a key factor in the development of critical systems, encompassing both conventional types, such as aircraft, and modern technologies, such as autonomous vehicles. Failures during their operation can be potentially far-reaching and impact people and the environment. To certify these systems and enable their employment, regulatory bodies require, among others, a safety case. However, the growing complexity of modern systems and iterative nature of development pose significant challenges to the traditional approaches for creating safety cases that are still used in practice. Furthermore, safety cases are often generated in an ad-hoc manner and remain disconnected from system models and related artefacts. Without these connections it is difficult to construct the proper infrastructure for producing and maintaining safety cases in a structured manner throughout the system lifecycle. This paper presents our innovative method, Andromeda, and its underpinning metamodel, which establish connections between safety cases, system models, safety assessment activities aligned with international safety standards, and argument patterns. Automation is applied across various stages of the production of argument structures that support safety assurance and certification activities. Andromeda is complemented by tool-support designed to facilitate its application, and we demonstrate our work through a case study from the aviation industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 112256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Andromeda: A model-connected framework for safety assessment and assurance\",\"authors\":\"Athanasios Retouniotis ,&nbsp;Yiannis Papadopoulos ,&nbsp;Ioannis Sorokos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Safety is a key factor in the development of critical systems, encompassing both conventional types, such as aircraft, and modern technologies, such as autonomous vehicles. Failures during their operation can be potentially far-reaching and impact people and the environment. To certify these systems and enable their employment, regulatory bodies require, among others, a safety case. However, the growing complexity of modern systems and iterative nature of development pose significant challenges to the traditional approaches for creating safety cases that are still used in practice. Furthermore, safety cases are often generated in an ad-hoc manner and remain disconnected from system models and related artefacts. Without these connections it is difficult to construct the proper infrastructure for producing and maintaining safety cases in a structured manner throughout the system lifecycle. This paper presents our innovative method, Andromeda, and its underpinning metamodel, which establish connections between safety cases, system models, safety assessment activities aligned with international safety standards, and argument patterns. Automation is applied across various stages of the production of argument structures that support safety assurance and certification activities. Andromeda is complemented by tool-support designed to facilitate its application, and we demonstrate our work through a case study from the aviation industry.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224003005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224003005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安全是关键系统开发的关键因素,包括飞机等传统类型和自动驾驶汽车等现代技术。这些系统在运行过程中出现故障,可能会对人类和环境造成深远影响。为了对这些系统进行认证并使其投入使用,监管机构要求提供安全案例等。然而,现代系统的日益复杂性和开发过程中的迭代性,给目前仍在实践中使用的传统安全案例创建方法带来了巨大挑战。此外,安全案例往往是临时生成的,与系统模型和相关人工制品脱节。如果没有这些联系,就很难在整个系统生命周期内构建适当的基础设施,以结构化的方式生成和维护安全案例。本文介绍了我们的创新方法 Andromeda 及其基础元模型,它们在安全案例、系统模型、符合国际安全标准的安全评估活动和论证模式之间建立了联系。自动化应用于支持安全保证和认证活动的论证结构生产的各个阶段。Andromeda 还辅以旨在促进其应用的工具支持,我们通过航空业的案例研究来展示我们的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Andromeda: A model-connected framework for safety assessment and assurance
Safety is a key factor in the development of critical systems, encompassing both conventional types, such as aircraft, and modern technologies, such as autonomous vehicles. Failures during their operation can be potentially far-reaching and impact people and the environment. To certify these systems and enable their employment, regulatory bodies require, among others, a safety case. However, the growing complexity of modern systems and iterative nature of development pose significant challenges to the traditional approaches for creating safety cases that are still used in practice. Furthermore, safety cases are often generated in an ad-hoc manner and remain disconnected from system models and related artefacts. Without these connections it is difficult to construct the proper infrastructure for producing and maintaining safety cases in a structured manner throughout the system lifecycle. This paper presents our innovative method, Andromeda, and its underpinning metamodel, which establish connections between safety cases, system models, safety assessment activities aligned with international safety standards, and argument patterns. Automation is applied across various stages of the production of argument structures that support safety assurance and certification activities. Andromeda is complemented by tool-support designed to facilitate its application, and we demonstrate our work through a case study from the aviation industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: • Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution • Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development • Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems • Human factors and management concerns of software development • Data management and big data issues of software systems • Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources • Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board OSCAR-P and aMLLibrary: Profiling and predicting the performance of FaaS-based applications in computing continua Integrating neural mutation into mutation-based fault localization: A hybrid approach Agent design pattern catalogue: A collection of architectural patterns for foundation model based agents Developing and sustaining a student-driven software solutions center—An experience report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1