精神疾病患者对自助式数字服务的实用性:健康信心和社会人口特征的作用

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105693
Iiris Hörhammer , Johanna Suvanto , Maarit Kinnunen , Sari Kujala
{"title":"精神疾病患者对自助式数字服务的实用性:健康信心和社会人口特征的作用","authors":"Iiris Hörhammer ,&nbsp;Johanna Suvanto ,&nbsp;Maarit Kinnunen ,&nbsp;Sari Kujala","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Remote services provided via telephone or the internet have become an essential part of mental health provision. Alongside services involving healthcare personnel (HCP), self-guided digital services hold great promise for improved self-management and health outcomes without increasing the burden on HCP. Therefore, better understanding of patients’ use and experienced benefits of these services are needed. This study investigated how health confidence and sociodemographic background are associated with mental health patients’ experiences of self-guided digital services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional survey study was performed in 2022 at a Finnish Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (MHSAS) unit of a regional public service provider that serves a population of about 163<!--> <!-->000 people. All patients who had visited the unit up to 6 months before the study were invited to respond to an online survey on their experiences with the remote MHSAS. We report the average subjective usefulness of telephone, guided digital and self-guided digital services. Regression models were fitted to study the associations of patient characteristics with use of any digital service, and with experienced usefulness of self-guided digital services.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The respondents (n = 438) rated the usefulness of telephone, guided digital and self-guided digital services similarly (4.0/5.0, 3.9/5.0, and 3.9/5.0, respectively). Health confidence was associated with not using digital services at all as well as with high perceived usefulness of self-guided services. While elderly patients were more likely to avoid using digital services, age was not associated with experienced usefulness of self-guided digital services. No association between unemployment status and experiences of digital services was found.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Different types of remote services are perceived as beneficial by mental health patients. To ensure effectiveness and equity, patients’ health confidence should be considered when directing them to self-guided services. Elderly mental health patients who use digital services are equally able as younger patients to benefit from self-guided services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 105693"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of self-guided digital services among mental health patients: The role of health confidence and sociodemographic characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Iiris Hörhammer ,&nbsp;Johanna Suvanto ,&nbsp;Maarit Kinnunen ,&nbsp;Sari Kujala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Remote services provided via telephone or the internet have become an essential part of mental health provision. Alongside services involving healthcare personnel (HCP), self-guided digital services hold great promise for improved self-management and health outcomes without increasing the burden on HCP. Therefore, better understanding of patients’ use and experienced benefits of these services are needed. This study investigated how health confidence and sociodemographic background are associated with mental health patients’ experiences of self-guided digital services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional survey study was performed in 2022 at a Finnish Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (MHSAS) unit of a regional public service provider that serves a population of about 163<!--> <!-->000 people. All patients who had visited the unit up to 6 months before the study were invited to respond to an online survey on their experiences with the remote MHSAS. We report the average subjective usefulness of telephone, guided digital and self-guided digital services. Regression models were fitted to study the associations of patient characteristics with use of any digital service, and with experienced usefulness of self-guided digital services.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The respondents (n = 438) rated the usefulness of telephone, guided digital and self-guided digital services similarly (4.0/5.0, 3.9/5.0, and 3.9/5.0, respectively). Health confidence was associated with not using digital services at all as well as with high perceived usefulness of self-guided services. While elderly patients were more likely to avoid using digital services, age was not associated with experienced usefulness of self-guided digital services. No association between unemployment status and experiences of digital services was found.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Different types of remote services are perceived as beneficial by mental health patients. To ensure effectiveness and equity, patients’ health confidence should be considered when directing them to self-guided services. Elderly mental health patients who use digital services are equally able as younger patients to benefit from self-guided services.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624003563\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624003563","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景通过电话或互联网提供的远程服务已成为心理健康服务的重要组成部分。除了有医护人员(HCP)参与的服务外,自我指导的数字服务在不增加医护人员负担的情况下,在改善自我管理和健康结果方面大有可为。因此,我们需要更好地了解患者对这些服务的使用情况和体验到的益处。本研究调查了健康信心和社会人口背景与精神疾病患者对自助式数字化服务的体验之间的关系。方法这项横断面调查研究于 2022 年在芬兰一家地区性公共服务提供商的精神健康和药物滥用服务机构(MHSAS)进行,该机构服务的人口约为 163000 人。所有在研究开始前6个月内到访过该机构的患者都受邀参加了一项在线调查,以了解他们对远程心理健康与药物滥用服务机构的体验。我们报告了电话、数字导诊和自助数字导诊服务的平均主观有用性。研究结果受访者(n = 438)对电话、引导式数字服务和引导式自助数字服务的实用性评价相似(分别为 4.0/5.0、3.9/5.0 和 3.9/5.0)。健康信心与完全不使用数字服务以及自我指导服务的高感知有用性相关。虽然老年患者更有可能避免使用数字服务,但年龄与自助式数字服务的有用性无关。结论精神疾病患者认为不同类型的远程服务都是有益的。为确保有效性和公平性,在引导患者使用自助服务时应考虑到他们的健康信心。使用数字服务的老年精神疾病患者与年轻患者一样能够从自助服务中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usefulness of self-guided digital services among mental health patients: The role of health confidence and sociodemographic characteristics

Background

Remote services provided via telephone or the internet have become an essential part of mental health provision. Alongside services involving healthcare personnel (HCP), self-guided digital services hold great promise for improved self-management and health outcomes without increasing the burden on HCP. Therefore, better understanding of patients’ use and experienced benefits of these services are needed. This study investigated how health confidence and sociodemographic background are associated with mental health patients’ experiences of self-guided digital services.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey study was performed in 2022 at a Finnish Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (MHSAS) unit of a regional public service provider that serves a population of about 163 000 people. All patients who had visited the unit up to 6 months before the study were invited to respond to an online survey on their experiences with the remote MHSAS. We report the average subjective usefulness of telephone, guided digital and self-guided digital services. Regression models were fitted to study the associations of patient characteristics with use of any digital service, and with experienced usefulness of self-guided digital services.

Findings

The respondents (n = 438) rated the usefulness of telephone, guided digital and self-guided digital services similarly (4.0/5.0, 3.9/5.0, and 3.9/5.0, respectively). Health confidence was associated with not using digital services at all as well as with high perceived usefulness of self-guided services. While elderly patients were more likely to avoid using digital services, age was not associated with experienced usefulness of self-guided digital services. No association between unemployment status and experiences of digital services was found.

Conclusions

Different types of remote services are perceived as beneficial by mental health patients. To ensure effectiveness and equity, patients’ health confidence should be considered when directing them to self-guided services. Elderly mental health patients who use digital services are equally able as younger patients to benefit from self-guided services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Analysis of missing data in electronic health records of people with diabetes in primary care in Spain: A population-based cohort study What information do patients pay more attention to in online physician selection? Information needs model for online medical choice decision-making based on trust theory and fuzzy decision Systematic construction of composite radiation therapy dataset using automated data pipeline for prognosis prediction Perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients with cardiovascular diseases on mHealth lifestyle apps: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1