Leonie Sibley , Heike Russ , Ghazallah Ahmad , Benjamin Baumgärtner , Daniel Bräutigam , Sonja Brümmer , Hannah Bussmann , Nadja Erb , Leah Evans , Silke Fischer , Lucie Gradl , Rebecca Guddemi , Kathrin-Beatrice Hauptmann , Julian Hieke , Samantha Hilsdorf , Friedemann Högerle , Bärbel Hoppe-Brixner , Woomok Jeong , Susanne Karl , Sarah Lang , Andreas Lachner
{"title":"基于技术的非交互式教学是否能提高学生的课堂学习效果?","authors":"Leonie Sibley , Heike Russ , Ghazallah Ahmad , Benjamin Baumgärtner , Daniel Bräutigam , Sonja Brümmer , Hannah Bussmann , Nadja Erb , Leah Evans , Silke Fischer , Lucie Gradl , Rebecca Guddemi , Kathrin-Beatrice Hauptmann , Julian Hieke , Samantha Hilsdorf , Friedemann Högerle , Bärbel Hoppe-Brixner , Woomok Jeong , Susanne Karl , Sarah Lang , Andreas Lachner","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of evidence-based practices can be regarded as the gold standard in technology-based learning and instruction. A steadily adopted educational practice is technology-mediated non-interactive teaching, in which students generate explanations of the previously learned contents to a fictitious audience by means of technologies (e.g., video, messenger). Although recent laboratory studies documented benefits of non-interactive teaching, field-oriented evidence is scarce. Research is needed to examine how laboratory evidence applies to authentic learning environments with school students and to determine whether these effects are generalizable to different authentic contexts. We applied a ManyClasses study to a) examine the generalizability of technology-based non-interactive teaching and b) explore context-related (domain, school type), demographical-related (age, gender, language), and implementation-related (grading, medium, timing) boundary conditions. In collaboration with teachers, we realized <em>k</em> = 20 different teaching units (each consisting of two lessons) in authentic settings across various school types and domains. Using a within-participants design, school students (<em>N</em> = 191) either taught the previously learned contents by means of technology to a fictitious peer or retrieved the contents in mind after the lesson. Results showed no main effect of non-interactive teaching; but domain and school type moderated the learning activity. The findings indicate that non-interactive teaching is not effective per se, but rather depends on the instructional contexts in which it is implemented. The investigation of the teaching effect with new approaches allows, for the first time, more generalizable conclusions to be drawn about non-interactive teaching with technology for students in authentic settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100233"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does technology-based non-interactive teaching enhance students’ learning in the classroom?\",\"authors\":\"Leonie Sibley , Heike Russ , Ghazallah Ahmad , Benjamin Baumgärtner , Daniel Bräutigam , Sonja Brümmer , Hannah Bussmann , Nadja Erb , Leah Evans , Silke Fischer , Lucie Gradl , Rebecca Guddemi , Kathrin-Beatrice Hauptmann , Julian Hieke , Samantha Hilsdorf , Friedemann Högerle , Bärbel Hoppe-Brixner , Woomok Jeong , Susanne Karl , Sarah Lang , Andreas Lachner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The use of evidence-based practices can be regarded as the gold standard in technology-based learning and instruction. A steadily adopted educational practice is technology-mediated non-interactive teaching, in which students generate explanations of the previously learned contents to a fictitious audience by means of technologies (e.g., video, messenger). Although recent laboratory studies documented benefits of non-interactive teaching, field-oriented evidence is scarce. Research is needed to examine how laboratory evidence applies to authentic learning environments with school students and to determine whether these effects are generalizable to different authentic contexts. We applied a ManyClasses study to a) examine the generalizability of technology-based non-interactive teaching and b) explore context-related (domain, school type), demographical-related (age, gender, language), and implementation-related (grading, medium, timing) boundary conditions. In collaboration with teachers, we realized <em>k</em> = 20 different teaching units (each consisting of two lessons) in authentic settings across various school types and domains. Using a within-participants design, school students (<em>N</em> = 191) either taught the previously learned contents by means of technology to a fictitious peer or retrieved the contents in mind after the lesson. Results showed no main effect of non-interactive teaching; but domain and school type moderated the learning activity. The findings indicate that non-interactive teaching is not effective per se, but rather depends on the instructional contexts in which it is implemented. The investigation of the teaching effect with new approaches allows, for the first time, more generalizable conclusions to be drawn about non-interactive teaching with technology for students in authentic settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在以技术为基础的学习和教学中,循证实践的使用可被视为黄金标准。以技术为中介的非交互式教学是一种稳定采用的教育实践,在这种教学中,学生通过技术手段(如视频、信使)向虚构的听众解释先前所学的内容。虽然最近的实验室研究记录了非互动教学的好处,但面向实地的证据却很少。我们需要开展研究,考察实验室证据如何适用于在校学生的真实学习环境,并确定这些效果是否可以推广到不同的真实情境中。我们应用了一项 ManyClasses 研究,以 a) 检验基于技术的非交互式教学的可推广性;b) 探索与情境相关(领域、学校类型)、人口相关(年龄、性别、语言)和实施相关(分级、媒介、时间安排)的边界条件。我们与教师合作,在不同学校类型和领域的真实环境中实现了 k = 20 个不同的教学单元(每个单元由两节课组成)。采用参与者内设计,在校学生(N = 191)要么通过技术手段向虚构的同伴传授以前学过的内容,要么在课后在头脑中检索这些内容。结果显示,非互动式教学没有主效应;但领域和学校类型对学习活动有调节作用。研究结果表明,非交互式教学本身并不有效,而是取决于其实施的教学情境。通过采用新方法对教学效果进行调查,我们第一次可以对在真实环境中使用技术对学生进行非交互式教学得出更具普遍性的结论。
Does technology-based non-interactive teaching enhance students’ learning in the classroom?
The use of evidence-based practices can be regarded as the gold standard in technology-based learning and instruction. A steadily adopted educational practice is technology-mediated non-interactive teaching, in which students generate explanations of the previously learned contents to a fictitious audience by means of technologies (e.g., video, messenger). Although recent laboratory studies documented benefits of non-interactive teaching, field-oriented evidence is scarce. Research is needed to examine how laboratory evidence applies to authentic learning environments with school students and to determine whether these effects are generalizable to different authentic contexts. We applied a ManyClasses study to a) examine the generalizability of technology-based non-interactive teaching and b) explore context-related (domain, school type), demographical-related (age, gender, language), and implementation-related (grading, medium, timing) boundary conditions. In collaboration with teachers, we realized k = 20 different teaching units (each consisting of two lessons) in authentic settings across various school types and domains. Using a within-participants design, school students (N = 191) either taught the previously learned contents by means of technology to a fictitious peer or retrieved the contents in mind after the lesson. Results showed no main effect of non-interactive teaching; but domain and school type moderated the learning activity. The findings indicate that non-interactive teaching is not effective per se, but rather depends on the instructional contexts in which it is implemented. The investigation of the teaching effect with new approaches allows, for the first time, more generalizable conclusions to be drawn about non-interactive teaching with technology for students in authentic settings.