在网络可视化中引入公平性

IF 8.1 1区 计算机科学 0 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2024.121642
Peter Eades , Seokhee Hong , Giuseppe Liotta , Fabrizio Montecchiani , Martin Nöllenburg , Tommaso Piselli , Stephen Wismath
{"title":"在网络可视化中引入公平性","authors":"Peter Eades ,&nbsp;Seokhee Hong ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Liotta ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Montecchiani ,&nbsp;Martin Nöllenburg ,&nbsp;Tommaso Piselli ,&nbsp;Stephen Wismath","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2024.121642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motivated by the need for decision-making systems that avoid bias and discrimination, the concept of fairness recently gained traction in the broad field of artificial intelligence, stimulating new research also within the information visualization community. In this paper, we introduce a notion of fairness in network visualization, specifically for orthogonal and for straight-line drawings of graphs, two foundational paradigms in the field. We investigate the following research questions: (i) What is the price, in terms of global readability, of incorporating fairness constraints in graph drawings? (ii) How unfair is a graph drawing that does not optimize fairness as a primary objective? We present both theoretical and empirical results. In particular, we design and implement two optimization algorithms for multi-objective functions, one based on an ILP model for orthogonal drawings, and one based on gradient descent for straight-line drawings. In a nutshell, we experimentally show that it is possible to significantly increase the fairness of a drawing by paying a relatively small amount in terms of reduced global readability. Also, we present a use case in which we qualitatively evaluate our approach on a practical scenario.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51063,"journal":{"name":"Information Sciences","volume":"691 ","pages":"Article 121642"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing fairness in network visualization\",\"authors\":\"Peter Eades ,&nbsp;Seokhee Hong ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Liotta ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Montecchiani ,&nbsp;Martin Nöllenburg ,&nbsp;Tommaso Piselli ,&nbsp;Stephen Wismath\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ins.2024.121642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Motivated by the need for decision-making systems that avoid bias and discrimination, the concept of fairness recently gained traction in the broad field of artificial intelligence, stimulating new research also within the information visualization community. In this paper, we introduce a notion of fairness in network visualization, specifically for orthogonal and for straight-line drawings of graphs, two foundational paradigms in the field. We investigate the following research questions: (i) What is the price, in terms of global readability, of incorporating fairness constraints in graph drawings? (ii) How unfair is a graph drawing that does not optimize fairness as a primary objective? We present both theoretical and empirical results. In particular, we design and implement two optimization algorithms for multi-objective functions, one based on an ILP model for orthogonal drawings, and one based on gradient descent for straight-line drawings. In a nutshell, we experimentally show that it is possible to significantly increase the fairness of a drawing by paying a relatively small amount in terms of reduced global readability. Also, we present a use case in which we qualitatively evaluate our approach on a practical scenario.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Sciences\",\"volume\":\"691 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025524015561\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025524015561","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

出于对避免偏见和歧视的决策系统的需求,公平的概念最近在广泛的人工智能领域获得了广泛关注,同时也激发了信息可视化领域的新研究。在本文中,我们介绍了网络可视化中的公平性概念,特别是正交图和直线图这两个领域的基础范例。我们探讨了以下研究问题:(i) 从全局可读性的角度来看,在图形绘制中加入公平性约束的代价是什么?(ii) 不以优化公平性为首要目标的图形绘制有多不公平?我们提出了理论和实证结果。特别是,我们为多目标函数设计并实现了两种优化算法,一种基于正交绘图的 ILP 模型,另一种基于直线绘图的梯度下降算法。简而言之,我们通过实验证明,只需付出相对较小的代价,降低全局可读性,就能显著提高绘图的公平性。此外,我们还介绍了一个使用案例,在该案例中,我们对我们的方法在实际场景中进行了定性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introducing fairness in network visualization
Motivated by the need for decision-making systems that avoid bias and discrimination, the concept of fairness recently gained traction in the broad field of artificial intelligence, stimulating new research also within the information visualization community. In this paper, we introduce a notion of fairness in network visualization, specifically for orthogonal and for straight-line drawings of graphs, two foundational paradigms in the field. We investigate the following research questions: (i) What is the price, in terms of global readability, of incorporating fairness constraints in graph drawings? (ii) How unfair is a graph drawing that does not optimize fairness as a primary objective? We present both theoretical and empirical results. In particular, we design and implement two optimization algorithms for multi-objective functions, one based on an ILP model for orthogonal drawings, and one based on gradient descent for straight-line drawings. In a nutshell, we experimentally show that it is possible to significantly increase the fairness of a drawing by paying a relatively small amount in terms of reduced global readability. Also, we present a use case in which we qualitatively evaluate our approach on a practical scenario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Sciences
Information Sciences 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
17.30%
发文量
1322
审稿时长
10.4 months
期刊介绍: Informatics and Computer Science Intelligent Systems Applications is an esteemed international journal that focuses on publishing original and creative research findings in the field of information sciences. We also feature a limited number of timely tutorial and surveying contributions. Our journal aims to cater to a diverse audience, including researchers, developers, managers, strategic planners, graduate students, and anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge research in information science, knowledge engineering, and intelligent systems. While readers are expected to share a common interest in information science, they come from varying backgrounds such as engineering, mathematics, statistics, physics, computer science, cell biology, molecular biology, management science, cognitive science, neurobiology, behavioral sciences, and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Community structure testing by counting frequent common neighbor sets Finite-time secure synchronization for stochastic complex networks with delayed coupling under deception attacks: A two-step switching control scheme Adaptive granular data compression and interval granulation for efficient classification Introducing fairness in network visualization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1