H Fernandez , L Miquel , J Sroussi , S Weyers , M Munmany , X Luo , P Kovar , Y Wang , A Sardo Di Spiezio , A Surbonne , V Delporte , E Moratalla , M Sauvan , G Perrini , L Sui , M Mara
{"title":"治疗重度和中度宫内粘连:关于沃麦德叶片屏障膜疗效的 PREG2 国际临床试验结果","authors":"H Fernandez , L Miquel , J Sroussi , S Weyers , M Munmany , X Luo , P Kovar , Y Wang , A Sardo Di Spiezio , A Surbonne , V Delporte , E Moratalla , M Sauvan , G Perrini , L Sui , M Mara","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>Recurrence rate after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis can be as high as 60%. This RCT aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new intrauterine mechanical barrier film in the management of IUA.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>PREG2 is a double-blind randomized, controlled, stratified study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>16 sites in Europe and China.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>Patients scheduled for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis because of symptomatic severe or moderate adhesions (AFS score ≥ 5).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Following adhesiolysis, patients were randomized to either have a Womed Leaf film inserted or not. Womed Leaf (Womed SAS, France) is a degradable polymer film that expands to fill the entire cavity and acts as a mechanical barrier between the uterine walls. After about a week, it degrades and is discharged naturally. Hormonal treatment was authorized in both groups. Patients were scheduled for second-look hysteroscopy (SLH) after 4 to 8 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>The effectiveness endpoints were: Change in AFS score between baseline and SLH, responder rate (i.e. patients who improved of at least two clinical categories, e.g. from severe to mild or from moderate to no IUA) and absence of IUA at SLH. The patient and the SLH evaluator were blind. 160 women were randomized. The reduction in AFS score at SLH was significantly higher in the intervention compared to the control group (5.2 ± 2.8 vs. 4.2 ± 3.2; p=0.0153). The responder rate was significantly higher in the intervention group (51% vs 29% OR 2.7 [1.4–5.5]; p=0.0052). The absence of adhesions at SLH was significantly higher in the intervention group (41% vs 24% OR 2.44 [CI 1.161 - 5.116]; p=0.0189). None of the reported adverse events were serious or considered related to the device.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This large RCT of patients with severe or moderate IUA demonstrated the effectiveness of Womed Leaf. It is the first adhesion barrier to show any clinically meaningful improvement in this challenging indication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":"31 11","pages":"Pages S21-S22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Severe and Moderate Intrauterine Adhesions: Results of PREG2 International RCT on the Effectiveness of Womed Leaf Barrier Film\",\"authors\":\"H Fernandez , L Miquel , J Sroussi , S Weyers , M Munmany , X Luo , P Kovar , Y Wang , A Sardo Di Spiezio , A Surbonne , V Delporte , E Moratalla , M Sauvan , G Perrini , L Sui , M Mara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>Recurrence rate after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis can be as high as 60%. This RCT aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new intrauterine mechanical barrier film in the management of IUA.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>PREG2 is a double-blind randomized, controlled, stratified study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>16 sites in Europe and China.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>Patients scheduled for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis because of symptomatic severe or moderate adhesions (AFS score ≥ 5).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Following adhesiolysis, patients were randomized to either have a Womed Leaf film inserted or not. Womed Leaf (Womed SAS, France) is a degradable polymer film that expands to fill the entire cavity and acts as a mechanical barrier between the uterine walls. After about a week, it degrades and is discharged naturally. Hormonal treatment was authorized in both groups. Patients were scheduled for second-look hysteroscopy (SLH) after 4 to 8 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>The effectiveness endpoints were: Change in AFS score between baseline and SLH, responder rate (i.e. patients who improved of at least two clinical categories, e.g. from severe to mild or from moderate to no IUA) and absence of IUA at SLH. The patient and the SLH evaluator were blind. 160 women were randomized. The reduction in AFS score at SLH was significantly higher in the intervention compared to the control group (5.2 ± 2.8 vs. 4.2 ± 3.2; p=0.0153). The responder rate was significantly higher in the intervention group (51% vs 29% OR 2.7 [1.4–5.5]; p=0.0052). The absence of adhesions at SLH was significantly higher in the intervention group (41% vs 24% OR 2.44 [CI 1.161 - 5.116]; p=0.0189). None of the reported adverse events were serious or considered related to the device.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This large RCT of patients with severe or moderate IUA demonstrated the effectiveness of Womed Leaf. It is the first adhesion barrier to show any clinically meaningful improvement in this challenging indication.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":\"31 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages S21-S22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155346502400503X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155346502400503X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment of Severe and Moderate Intrauterine Adhesions: Results of PREG2 International RCT on the Effectiveness of Womed Leaf Barrier Film
Study Objective
Recurrence rate after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis can be as high as 60%. This RCT aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new intrauterine mechanical barrier film in the management of IUA.
Design
PREG2 is a double-blind randomized, controlled, stratified study.
Setting
16 sites in Europe and China.
Patients or Participants
Patients scheduled for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis because of symptomatic severe or moderate adhesions (AFS score ≥ 5).
Interventions
Following adhesiolysis, patients were randomized to either have a Womed Leaf film inserted or not. Womed Leaf (Womed SAS, France) is a degradable polymer film that expands to fill the entire cavity and acts as a mechanical barrier between the uterine walls. After about a week, it degrades and is discharged naturally. Hormonal treatment was authorized in both groups. Patients were scheduled for second-look hysteroscopy (SLH) after 4 to 8 weeks.
Measurements and Main Results
The effectiveness endpoints were: Change in AFS score between baseline and SLH, responder rate (i.e. patients who improved of at least two clinical categories, e.g. from severe to mild or from moderate to no IUA) and absence of IUA at SLH. The patient and the SLH evaluator were blind. 160 women were randomized. The reduction in AFS score at SLH was significantly higher in the intervention compared to the control group (5.2 ± 2.8 vs. 4.2 ± 3.2; p=0.0153). The responder rate was significantly higher in the intervention group (51% vs 29% OR 2.7 [1.4–5.5]; p=0.0052). The absence of adhesions at SLH was significantly higher in the intervention group (41% vs 24% OR 2.44 [CI 1.161 - 5.116]; p=0.0189). None of the reported adverse events were serious or considered related to the device.
Conclusion
This large RCT of patients with severe or moderate IUA demonstrated the effectiveness of Womed Leaf. It is the first adhesion barrier to show any clinically meaningful improvement in this challenging indication.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.