{"title":"单孔机器人子宫切除术切除增大的子宫","authors":"E Olig , J Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>This video depicts a hysterectomy using single port robotic assistance and describes the inherent differences between operating with this console versus multiport setups.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Single patient case report.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Academic medical center.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>The patient is a 44-year-old G0 with a history of previous multiport robotic myomectomy. She presented with recurrent bulk symptoms and new fibroid burden. She desired definitive management and had no interest in fertility.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Patient underwent uncomplicated single port robotic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. The patient's procedure was uncomplicated, and she recovered without difficulty and with excellent pain control.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>Single port robotic surgery provides similar functionality to multiport robotics with potentially decreased postoperative pain and improved cosmesis. Surgical technique for single port hysterectomy is similar to multiport hysterectomy. Special considerations in single port surgery include instrument selection and movement of instruments and camera as a unit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Further implementation and study of single port robotics in gynecology should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":"31 11","pages":"Page S11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single Port Robotic Hysterectomy of an Enlarged Uterus\",\"authors\":\"E Olig , J Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>This video depicts a hysterectomy using single port robotic assistance and describes the inherent differences between operating with this console versus multiport setups.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Single patient case report.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Academic medical center.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>The patient is a 44-year-old G0 with a history of previous multiport robotic myomectomy. She presented with recurrent bulk symptoms and new fibroid burden. She desired definitive management and had no interest in fertility.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Patient underwent uncomplicated single port robotic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. The patient's procedure was uncomplicated, and she recovered without difficulty and with excellent pain control.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>Single port robotic surgery provides similar functionality to multiport robotics with potentially decreased postoperative pain and improved cosmesis. Surgical technique for single port hysterectomy is similar to multiport hysterectomy. Special considerations in single port surgery include instrument selection and movement of instruments and camera as a unit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Further implementation and study of single port robotics in gynecology should be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":\"31 11\",\"pages\":\"Page S11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465024004618\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465024004618","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Single Port Robotic Hysterectomy of an Enlarged Uterus
Study Objective
This video depicts a hysterectomy using single port robotic assistance and describes the inherent differences between operating with this console versus multiport setups.
Design
Single patient case report.
Setting
Academic medical center.
Patients or Participants
The patient is a 44-year-old G0 with a history of previous multiport robotic myomectomy. She presented with recurrent bulk symptoms and new fibroid burden. She desired definitive management and had no interest in fertility.
Interventions
Patient underwent uncomplicated single port robotic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. The patient's procedure was uncomplicated, and she recovered without difficulty and with excellent pain control.
Measurements and Main Results
Single port robotic surgery provides similar functionality to multiport robotics with potentially decreased postoperative pain and improved cosmesis. Surgical technique for single port hysterectomy is similar to multiport hysterectomy. Special considerations in single port surgery include instrument selection and movement of instruments and camera as a unit.
Conclusion
Further implementation and study of single port robotics in gynecology should be considered.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.