新生儿期复苏中医护人员的通气方法和准备情况:奥地利医院综合调查研究

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100817
Eva M. Schwindt , Reinhold Stockenhuber , Jens Christian Schwindt
{"title":"新生儿期复苏中医护人员的通气方法和准备情况:奥地利医院综合调查研究","authors":"Eva M. Schwindt ,&nbsp;Reinhold Stockenhuber ,&nbsp;Jens Christian Schwindt","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim of the study</h3><div>Although neonatal resuscitation is rare, and high-risk births usually occur in specialised centres, unexpected resuscitation measures may be necessary during births that are initially considered low-risk. This survey assessed the practices of healthcare providers in Austrian hospitals for postnatal resuscitation and evaluated their self-assessed airway management skills for newborns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey was distributed to all staff members responsible for the postnatal care of newborns in hospitals with obstetrics in Austria through the heads of departments (paediatrics, obstetrics, and anaesthesiology). The results are presented in terms of hospital care level and birth volume.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 79.5 % of all hospitals with maternity units in Austria participated in the survey. Preparedness was found to be improved with the level of care provided by the hospital. Overall, 50.4 % of the respondents did not feel adequately prepared for neonatal emergencies, and 35.0 % rated their face mask ventilation skills as insufficient. According to the survey results in 61.3 % of included hospitals or 52.5 % of births in Austria, safe endotracheal intubation cannot be provided.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A significant proportion of healthcare workers in Austria responsible for postnatal newborn care do not feel adequately prepared for newborn emergencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ventilation practices and preparedness of healthcare providers in term newborn resuscitation: A comprehensive survey study in Austrian hospitals\",\"authors\":\"Eva M. Schwindt ,&nbsp;Reinhold Stockenhuber ,&nbsp;Jens Christian Schwindt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim of the study</h3><div>Although neonatal resuscitation is rare, and high-risk births usually occur in specialised centres, unexpected resuscitation measures may be necessary during births that are initially considered low-risk. This survey assessed the practices of healthcare providers in Austrian hospitals for postnatal resuscitation and evaluated their self-assessed airway management skills for newborns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey was distributed to all staff members responsible for the postnatal care of newborns in hospitals with obstetrics in Austria through the heads of departments (paediatrics, obstetrics, and anaesthesiology). The results are presented in terms of hospital care level and birth volume.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 79.5 % of all hospitals with maternity units in Austria participated in the survey. Preparedness was found to be improved with the level of care provided by the hospital. Overall, 50.4 % of the respondents did not feel adequately prepared for neonatal emergencies, and 35.0 % rated their face mask ventilation skills as insufficient. According to the survey results in 61.3 % of included hospitals or 52.5 % of births in Austria, safe endotracheal intubation cannot be provided.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A significant proportion of healthcare workers in Austria responsible for postnatal newborn care do not feel adequately prepared for newborn emergencies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的虽然新生儿复苏很少见,而且高风险分娩通常发生在专业中心,但在最初被认为是低风险的分娩过程中,可能需要采取意想不到的复苏措施。这项调查评估了奥地利医院医护人员在产后复苏方面的做法,并对他们对新生儿气道管理技能的自我评估进行了评估。方法通过科室负责人(儿科、产科和麻醉科)向奥地利产科医院所有负责新生儿产后护理的工作人员发放了一份在线调查问卷。调查结果按医院护理水平和出生人数列出。调查发现,随着医院护理水平的提高,准备工作也有所改善。总体而言,50.4% 的受访者认为自己没有为新生儿紧急情况做好充分准备,35.0% 的受访者认为自己的面罩通气技能不足。根据调查结果,奥地利 61.3% 的医院或 52.5% 的新生儿无法进行安全的气管插管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ventilation practices and preparedness of healthcare providers in term newborn resuscitation: A comprehensive survey study in Austrian hospitals

Aim of the study

Although neonatal resuscitation is rare, and high-risk births usually occur in specialised centres, unexpected resuscitation measures may be necessary during births that are initially considered low-risk. This survey assessed the practices of healthcare providers in Austrian hospitals for postnatal resuscitation and evaluated their self-assessed airway management skills for newborns.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to all staff members responsible for the postnatal care of newborns in hospitals with obstetrics in Austria through the heads of departments (paediatrics, obstetrics, and anaesthesiology). The results are presented in terms of hospital care level and birth volume.

Results

In total, 79.5 % of all hospitals with maternity units in Austria participated in the survey. Preparedness was found to be improved with the level of care provided by the hospital. Overall, 50.4 % of the respondents did not feel adequately prepared for neonatal emergencies, and 35.0 % rated their face mask ventilation skills as insufficient. According to the survey results in 61.3 % of included hospitals or 52.5 % of births in Austria, safe endotracheal intubation cannot be provided.

Conclusion

A significant proportion of healthcare workers in Austria responsible for postnatal newborn care do not feel adequately prepared for newborn emergencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Prehospital ventilation strategies in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial (PIVOT trial) Effect of introduction of a rapid response system and increasing Medical Emergency Team (MET) activity on mortality over a 20-year period in a paediatric specialist hospital Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in obese patients: A scoping review Effect of chest compressions in addition to extracorporeal life support on carotid flow in an experimental model of refractory cardiac arrest in pigs Ventilation practices and preparedness of healthcare providers in term newborn resuscitation: A comprehensive survey study in Austrian hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1