用于含蜡石油原油的生物基流动改进剂

C.F. Uzoh , S.U John , H.A. Ezea , C.M. Ezechukwu , L.I. Igbonekwu , E.M. Madiebo
{"title":"用于含蜡石油原油的生物基流动改进剂","authors":"C.F. Uzoh ,&nbsp;S.U John ,&nbsp;H.A. Ezea ,&nbsp;C.M. Ezechukwu ,&nbsp;L.I. Igbonekwu ,&nbsp;E.M. Madiebo","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the efficacy of bio-based flow improvers, soybean oil (SBO) and castor oil (CAO), in mitigating the flow challenges posed by waxy crude oil, using Bonny Light crude oil as a case study. The study evaluated the impact of these additives on viscosity, gel strength, and pour point reduction. The performance of these additives was compared with a conventional flow improver, xylene. Results indicated that both SBO and CAO effectively reduced viscosity, gel strength, and pour point of the crude oil. Castor oil demonstrated superior performance in reducing gel strength, achieving a 98% reduction at 0.1 v/v concentration. Soybean oil, on the other hand, exhibited better performance in reducing pour point, with a 56.3% reduction at 1.9 v/v concentration. Xylene showed the highest viscosity reduction but had a less pronounced effect on gel strength and pour point. Optimum viscosity reduction of 85%, 83%, and 87% was achieved for SBO, CAO, and xylene, respectively, at specific process conditions. Similarly, gel strength reduction reached 94.36%, 94.89%, and 95.79% for SBO, CAO, and xylene, respectively. Pour point reduction was 56.3%, 52.7%, and 45.5% for SBO, CAO, and xylene, respectively, at the highest concentration tested. The study demonstrated the potential of bio-based additives as viable alternatives to conventional flow improvers for waxy crude oil. Further research is necessary to optimize their performance and explore their application in different crude oil systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 213444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bio-based flow improvers for waxy petroleum crude\",\"authors\":\"C.F. Uzoh ,&nbsp;S.U John ,&nbsp;H.A. Ezea ,&nbsp;C.M. Ezechukwu ,&nbsp;L.I. Igbonekwu ,&nbsp;E.M. Madiebo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigated the efficacy of bio-based flow improvers, soybean oil (SBO) and castor oil (CAO), in mitigating the flow challenges posed by waxy crude oil, using Bonny Light crude oil as a case study. The study evaluated the impact of these additives on viscosity, gel strength, and pour point reduction. The performance of these additives was compared with a conventional flow improver, xylene. Results indicated that both SBO and CAO effectively reduced viscosity, gel strength, and pour point of the crude oil. Castor oil demonstrated superior performance in reducing gel strength, achieving a 98% reduction at 0.1 v/v concentration. Soybean oil, on the other hand, exhibited better performance in reducing pour point, with a 56.3% reduction at 1.9 v/v concentration. Xylene showed the highest viscosity reduction but had a less pronounced effect on gel strength and pour point. Optimum viscosity reduction of 85%, 83%, and 87% was achieved for SBO, CAO, and xylene, respectively, at specific process conditions. Similarly, gel strength reduction reached 94.36%, 94.89%, and 95.79% for SBO, CAO, and xylene, respectively. Pour point reduction was 56.3%, 52.7%, and 45.5% for SBO, CAO, and xylene, respectively, at the highest concentration tested. The study demonstrated the potential of bio-based additives as viable alternatives to conventional flow improvers for waxy crude oil. Further research is necessary to optimize their performance and explore their application in different crude oil systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"244 \",\"pages\":\"Article 213444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891024008145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891024008145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以邦尼轻质原油(Bonny Light crude oil)为案例,调查了生物基流动性改进剂大豆油(SBO)和蓖麻油(CAO)在减轻含蜡原油带来的流动性挑战方面的功效。研究评估了这些添加剂对粘度、凝胶强度和倾点降低的影响。将这些添加剂的性能与传统的流动性改进剂二甲苯进行了比较。结果表明,SBO 和 CAO 都能有效降低原油的粘度、凝胶强度和倾点。蓖麻油在降低凝胶强度方面表现出色,0.1 v/v 浓度时可降低 98%。另一方面,大豆油在降低倾点方面表现更佳,在 1.9 v/v 浓度下降低了 56.3%。二甲苯的降粘效果最好,但对凝胶强度和倾点的影响不明显。在特定的工艺条件下,SBO、CAO 和二甲苯的最佳降粘效果分别为 85%、83% 和 87%。同样,SBO、CAO 和二甲苯的凝胶强度分别降低了 94.36%、94.89% 和 95.79%。在测试的最高浓度下,SBO、CAO 和二甲苯的倾点分别降低了 56.3%、52.7% 和 45.5%。这项研究证明了生物基添加剂作为传统流动性改进剂的可行替代品在蜡质原油中的应用潜力。有必要开展进一步研究,以优化其性能并探索其在不同原油体系中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bio-based flow improvers for waxy petroleum crude
This study investigated the efficacy of bio-based flow improvers, soybean oil (SBO) and castor oil (CAO), in mitigating the flow challenges posed by waxy crude oil, using Bonny Light crude oil as a case study. The study evaluated the impact of these additives on viscosity, gel strength, and pour point reduction. The performance of these additives was compared with a conventional flow improver, xylene. Results indicated that both SBO and CAO effectively reduced viscosity, gel strength, and pour point of the crude oil. Castor oil demonstrated superior performance in reducing gel strength, achieving a 98% reduction at 0.1 v/v concentration. Soybean oil, on the other hand, exhibited better performance in reducing pour point, with a 56.3% reduction at 1.9 v/v concentration. Xylene showed the highest viscosity reduction but had a less pronounced effect on gel strength and pour point. Optimum viscosity reduction of 85%, 83%, and 87% was achieved for SBO, CAO, and xylene, respectively, at specific process conditions. Similarly, gel strength reduction reached 94.36%, 94.89%, and 95.79% for SBO, CAO, and xylene, respectively. Pour point reduction was 56.3%, 52.7%, and 45.5% for SBO, CAO, and xylene, respectively, at the highest concentration tested. The study demonstrated the potential of bio-based additives as viable alternatives to conventional flow improvers for waxy crude oil. Further research is necessary to optimize their performance and explore their application in different crude oil systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanism of microfracture propagation under mechanical–chemical coupling conditions considering dissolution Carbon steel pipeline CO2 erosion-corrosion damage prediction model and numerical simulation research Propped fracture conductivity in shale oil reservoirs: Prediction model and influencing factors Numerical study of using dual sources constructed via deconvolution to suppress the collar waves in acoustic logging while drilling Numerical investigation on heat extraction performance of supercritical CO2 in depleted oil and gas reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1