将 ASER 作为评估工具推广到整个南亚地区

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Educational Development Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103152
John Richards
{"title":"将 ASER 作为评估工具推广到整个南亚地区","authors":"John Richards","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since 2006, Pratham, an Indian NGO, has conducted large-scale biannual surveys in all Indian states, in basic reading and arithmetic – surveys known by the acronym \"ASER\" (Annual Status of Education Report, Rural). The article endorses large-scale international assessments (such as PISA and ASER) as necessary tools for evaluating school systems at national level in the case of centralized systems and, in countries with decentralized systems, for evaluating sub-national systems. In India, both the central government in Delhi and state-level governments exercise substantial education jurisdiction. Delhi's 2010–12 decisions to incentivize enrolment without reference to quality disproportionately impacted above-median states. Delhi's decision to close all schools for nearly two years during pandemic (2020–22) again disproportionately impacted outcomes in above-median states. Similar impacts arose for arithmetic. By the 2018 survey (pre-COVID), ranking states by grade 5 ability to read at a basic level, nearly three-fifths of students in top-quintile states could read; in bottom-quintile states, at best one third students could read. In 2022 (post-COVID), the national average of rural students able to achieve ASER basic reading and do arithmetic are below ASER 2010 results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 103152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extending ASER as an assessment tool throughout South Asia\",\"authors\":\"John Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Since 2006, Pratham, an Indian NGO, has conducted large-scale biannual surveys in all Indian states, in basic reading and arithmetic – surveys known by the acronym \\\"ASER\\\" (Annual Status of Education Report, Rural). The article endorses large-scale international assessments (such as PISA and ASER) as necessary tools for evaluating school systems at national level in the case of centralized systems and, in countries with decentralized systems, for evaluating sub-national systems. In India, both the central government in Delhi and state-level governments exercise substantial education jurisdiction. Delhi's 2010–12 decisions to incentivize enrolment without reference to quality disproportionately impacted above-median states. Delhi's decision to close all schools for nearly two years during pandemic (2020–22) again disproportionately impacted outcomes in above-median states. Similar impacts arose for arithmetic. By the 2018 survey (pre-COVID), ranking states by grade 5 ability to read at a basic level, nearly three-fifths of students in top-quintile states could read; in bottom-quintile states, at best one third students could read. In 2022 (post-COVID), the national average of rural students able to achieve ASER basic reading and do arithmetic are below ASER 2010 results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059324001792\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059324001792","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2006 年以来,印度非政府组织 Pratham 在印度各邦开展了一年两次的大规模基础阅读和算术调查,这些调查的缩写为 "ASER"(农村教育年度状况报告)。文章赞同大规模国际评估(如国际学生评估方案和 ASER),认为对于中央集权制的国家而言,这是评估国家层面学校系统的必要工具,而对于地方分权制的国家而言,这是评估次国家系统的必要工具。在印度,德里中央政府和各邦政府都行使着很大的教育管辖权。德里在 2010-12 年期间做出的不考虑教育质量而鼓励入学的决定,对中等教育水平以上的邦造成了过大的影响。德里决定在大流行病期间(2020-22 年)关闭所有学校近两年,这也对中等以上各邦的教育成果造成了不成比例的影响。类似的影响也出现在算术方面。在 2018 年的调查(COVID 前)中,根据五年级学生的基本阅读能力对各州进行了排名,在排名前五分之一的州中,近五分之三的学生能够阅读;而在排名后五分之一的州中,最多只有三分之一的学生能够阅读。2022 年(COVID 后),全国农村学生能够达到 ASER 基本阅读和算术能力的平均水平低于 ASER 2010 年的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extending ASER as an assessment tool throughout South Asia
Since 2006, Pratham, an Indian NGO, has conducted large-scale biannual surveys in all Indian states, in basic reading and arithmetic – surveys known by the acronym "ASER" (Annual Status of Education Report, Rural). The article endorses large-scale international assessments (such as PISA and ASER) as necessary tools for evaluating school systems at national level in the case of centralized systems and, in countries with decentralized systems, for evaluating sub-national systems. In India, both the central government in Delhi and state-level governments exercise substantial education jurisdiction. Delhi's 2010–12 decisions to incentivize enrolment without reference to quality disproportionately impacted above-median states. Delhi's decision to close all schools for nearly two years during pandemic (2020–22) again disproportionately impacted outcomes in above-median states. Similar impacts arose for arithmetic. By the 2018 survey (pre-COVID), ranking states by grade 5 ability to read at a basic level, nearly three-fifths of students in top-quintile states could read; in bottom-quintile states, at best one third students could read. In 2022 (post-COVID), the national average of rural students able to achieve ASER basic reading and do arithmetic are below ASER 2010 results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
期刊最新文献
Schools and industries producing educational-labor paths in secondary TVET in Chile: Who sets the skills agenda? Addressing extremist abuses of medieval pasts: A connection-first approach to narratives of hate ‘Aid’ to higher education in a multiplex world: Exploring the diversity of donor discourses and rationales Borrowing policies better versus borrowing better policies? Lessons from the histories of Korea and Japan Extending ASER as an assessment tool throughout South Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1