在幼儿活动室的共同注意互动中,研究同伴对教育者-婴儿同步性的动态系统影响

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning Culture and Social Interaction Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100868
Sarah Jacobson , Sheila Degotardi , Naomi Sweller
{"title":"在幼儿活动室的共同注意互动中,研究同伴对教育者-婴儿同步性的动态系统影响","authors":"Sarah Jacobson ,&nbsp;Sheila Degotardi ,&nbsp;Naomi Sweller","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Joint attention is a crucial component of quality practice in infant–toddler early childhood education. Joint attention defines a social interaction in which infant and caregiver coordinate attention to engage with an object of interest. Mutual responsiveness within coordinated and creative joint action supports language and cognitive development. However, most joint attention research involves mother–infant dyads in laboratory playrooms or home environments with few distractions. Limited research in early childhood centres suggests joint attention is difficult to sustain in group settings. This study used a dynamic systems approach to operationalise educator–infant synchrony within dyadic and group joint attention interactions. Mutual responsiveness was coded as dyadic co-regulation states. Quantitative analysis of educator–infant co-regulation in relation to number of peers present identified symmetrical co-regulation as the preferred state of the system; however, its strength as an attractor diminished as group size increased. State space grid analysis of temporal dynamics within each interaction provided a more nuanced understanding of peers as perturbations. The structure of group activities and how educators divided their attention among infants were also influential factors. Increasing educators' awareness of the micro-dynamics of joint attention can enhance their ability to provide opportunities for collaborative learning experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A dynamic systems examination of the impact of peers on educator–infant synchrony within joint attention interactions in an early childhood room\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Jacobson ,&nbsp;Sheila Degotardi ,&nbsp;Naomi Sweller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Joint attention is a crucial component of quality practice in infant–toddler early childhood education. Joint attention defines a social interaction in which infant and caregiver coordinate attention to engage with an object of interest. Mutual responsiveness within coordinated and creative joint action supports language and cognitive development. However, most joint attention research involves mother–infant dyads in laboratory playrooms or home environments with few distractions. Limited research in early childhood centres suggests joint attention is difficult to sustain in group settings. This study used a dynamic systems approach to operationalise educator–infant synchrony within dyadic and group joint attention interactions. Mutual responsiveness was coded as dyadic co-regulation states. Quantitative analysis of educator–infant co-regulation in relation to number of peers present identified symmetrical co-regulation as the preferred state of the system; however, its strength as an attractor diminished as group size increased. State space grid analysis of temporal dynamics within each interaction provided a more nuanced understanding of peers as perturbations. The structure of group activities and how educators divided their attention among infants were also influential factors. Increasing educators' awareness of the micro-dynamics of joint attention can enhance their ability to provide opportunities for collaborative learning experiences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065612400076X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065612400076X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共同注意是婴幼儿早期教育优质实践的重要组成部分。共同关注是一种社会互动,在这种互动中,婴幼儿和照护者协调注意力,共同关注感兴趣的对象。在协调和创造性的联合行动中,相互响应有助于语言和认知能力的发展。然而,大多数联合注意研究都是在实验室游戏室或家庭环境中进行的,很少有分心的情况。在幼儿中心进行的有限研究表明,联合注意在群体环境中很难持续。本研究采用动态系统方法,在二人和集体共同注意互动中,对教育者与婴儿的同步性进行操作。相互响应被编码为两人共同调节状态。对教育者-婴儿共同调节与在场同伴数量的关系进行定量分析后发现,对称共同调节是系统的首选状态;然而,随着群体规模的增加,其作为吸引子的强度也随之减弱。通过对每次互动中的时间动态进行状态空间网格分析,可以更细致地了解作为扰动因素的同伴。小组活动的结构以及教育者如何将注意力分配给幼儿也是影响因素。提高教育者对共同关注的微观动态的认识,可以增强他们提供协作学习体验机会的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A dynamic systems examination of the impact of peers on educator–infant synchrony within joint attention interactions in an early childhood room
Joint attention is a crucial component of quality practice in infant–toddler early childhood education. Joint attention defines a social interaction in which infant and caregiver coordinate attention to engage with an object of interest. Mutual responsiveness within coordinated and creative joint action supports language and cognitive development. However, most joint attention research involves mother–infant dyads in laboratory playrooms or home environments with few distractions. Limited research in early childhood centres suggests joint attention is difficult to sustain in group settings. This study used a dynamic systems approach to operationalise educator–infant synchrony within dyadic and group joint attention interactions. Mutual responsiveness was coded as dyadic co-regulation states. Quantitative analysis of educator–infant co-regulation in relation to number of peers present identified symmetrical co-regulation as the preferred state of the system; however, its strength as an attractor diminished as group size increased. State space grid analysis of temporal dynamics within each interaction provided a more nuanced understanding of peers as perturbations. The structure of group activities and how educators divided their attention among infants were also influential factors. Increasing educators' awareness of the micro-dynamics of joint attention can enhance their ability to provide opportunities for collaborative learning experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
A dynamic systems examination of the impact of peers on educator–infant synchrony within joint attention interactions in an early childhood room Authority and positionings in elementary mathematics: An interactional ethnographic approach Peer interactions in 4/6-month-old infants: From motor development to multimodal communication Egalitarian dialogue and student participation in Learning Communities. The case of the Coquimbo Region, Chile Negotiating agency in teacher-children triads of collaborative (re)storytelling: Empirical study and methodological implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1