接种冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗后贝尔麻痹的发病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologia Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nrl.2022.10.002
Atena Soltanzadi , Omid Mirmosayyeb , Amin Momeni Moghaddam , Hamed Ghoshouni , Mahsa Ghajarzadeh
{"title":"接种冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗后贝尔麻痹的发病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Atena Soltanzadi ,&nbsp;Omid Mirmosayyeb ,&nbsp;Amin Momeni Moghaddam ,&nbsp;Hamed Ghoshouni ,&nbsp;Mahsa Ghajarzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.nrl.2022.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To estimate the pooled incidence of Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched by 2 independent researchers. We also searched the grey literature including references of the references and conference abstracts. We extracted data regarding the total number of participants, first author, publication year, the country of origin, sex, type of vaccines, and the number of patients who developed Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The literature search revealed 370 articles, subsequently deleting duplicates 227 remained. After careful evaluation of the full texts, 20 articles remained for meta-analysis. The most commonly administered vaccines were Pfizer followed by Moderna.</div><div>In total, 4.54e+07 individuals received vaccines against COVID-19, and 1739 cases developed Bell’s palsy. In nine studies, controls (individuals without vaccination) were enrolled. The total number of controls was 1 809 069, of whom 203 developed Bell’s palsy. The incidence of Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccines was ignorable. The odds of developing Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccines was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.79-1.32) (I2 = 74.8%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that the incidence of peripheral facial palsy after COVID-19 vaccination is ignorable and vaccination does not increase the risk of developing Bell’s palsy. Maybe, Bell’s palsy is a presenting symptom of a more severe form of COVID-19, so clinicians must be aware of this.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19300,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 9","pages":"Pages 802-809"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Bell’s palsy after coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Atena Soltanzadi ,&nbsp;Omid Mirmosayyeb ,&nbsp;Amin Momeni Moghaddam ,&nbsp;Hamed Ghoshouni ,&nbsp;Mahsa Ghajarzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nrl.2022.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To estimate the pooled incidence of Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched by 2 independent researchers. We also searched the grey literature including references of the references and conference abstracts. We extracted data regarding the total number of participants, first author, publication year, the country of origin, sex, type of vaccines, and the number of patients who developed Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The literature search revealed 370 articles, subsequently deleting duplicates 227 remained. After careful evaluation of the full texts, 20 articles remained for meta-analysis. The most commonly administered vaccines were Pfizer followed by Moderna.</div><div>In total, 4.54e+07 individuals received vaccines against COVID-19, and 1739 cases developed Bell’s palsy. In nine studies, controls (individuals without vaccination) were enrolled. The total number of controls was 1 809 069, of whom 203 developed Bell’s palsy. The incidence of Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccines was ignorable. The odds of developing Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccines was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.79-1.32) (I2 = 74.8%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that the incidence of peripheral facial palsy after COVID-19 vaccination is ignorable and vaccination does not increase the risk of developing Bell’s palsy. Maybe, Bell’s palsy is a presenting symptom of a more severe form of COVID-19, so clinicians must be aware of this.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 802-809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485323000294\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485323000294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 由两名独立研究人员检索了PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Web of Science和Google Scholar。我们还检索了灰色文献,包括参考文献和会议摘要。我们提取了有关参与者总数、第一作者、发表年份、来源国、性别、疫苗类型以及接种 COVID-19 疫苗后出现贝尔氏麻痹的患者人数的数据。对全文进行仔细评估后,剩下 20 篇文章用于荟萃分析。最常接种的疫苗是辉瑞公司的疫苗,其次是 Moderna 公司的疫苗。共有 4.54e+07 人接种了 COVID-19 疫苗,其中 1739 例出现了贝尔氏麻痹。在九项研究中,对照组(未接种疫苗者)也被纳入其中。对照组总人数为 1 809 069 人,其中 203 人患贝尔麻痹。接种 COVID-19 疫苗后,贝尔氏麻痹的发病率可忽略不计。接种 COVID-19 疫苗后发生贝尔氏麻痹的几率为 1.02 (95% CI: 0.79-1.32) (I2 = 74.8%, P < .001)。也许,贝尔氏麻痹是更严重形式的 COVID-19 的一种表现症状,因此临床医生必须注意这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence of Bell’s palsy after coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To estimate the pooled incidence of Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccination.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched by 2 independent researchers. We also searched the grey literature including references of the references and conference abstracts. We extracted data regarding the total number of participants, first author, publication year, the country of origin, sex, type of vaccines, and the number of patients who developed Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccination.

Results

The literature search revealed 370 articles, subsequently deleting duplicates 227 remained. After careful evaluation of the full texts, 20 articles remained for meta-analysis. The most commonly administered vaccines were Pfizer followed by Moderna.
In total, 4.54e+07 individuals received vaccines against COVID-19, and 1739 cases developed Bell’s palsy. In nine studies, controls (individuals without vaccination) were enrolled. The total number of controls was 1 809 069, of whom 203 developed Bell’s palsy. The incidence of Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccines was ignorable. The odds of developing Bell’s palsy after COVID-19 vaccines was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.79-1.32) (I2 = 74.8%, P < .001).

Conclusion

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that the incidence of peripheral facial palsy after COVID-19 vaccination is ignorable and vaccination does not increase the risk of developing Bell’s palsy. Maybe, Bell’s palsy is a presenting symptom of a more severe form of COVID-19, so clinicians must be aware of this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia
Neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
135
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Neurología es la revista oficial de la Sociedad Española de Neurología y publica, desde 1986 contribuciones científicas en el campo de la neurología clínica y experimental. Los contenidos de Neurología abarcan desde la neuroepidemiología, la clínica neurológica, la gestión y asistencia neurológica y la terapéutica, a la investigación básica en neurociencias aplicada a la neurología. Las áreas temáticas de la revistas incluyen la neurologia infantil, la neuropsicología, la neurorehabilitación y la neurogeriatría. Los artículos publicados en Neurología siguen un proceso de revisión por doble ciego a fin de que los trabajos sean seleccionados atendiendo a su calidad, originalidad e interés y así estén sometidos a un proceso de mejora. El formato de artículos incluye Editoriales, Originales, Revisiones y Cartas al Editor, Neurología es el vehículo de información científica de reconocida calidad en profesionales interesados en la neurología que utilizan el español, como demuestra su inclusión en los más prestigiosos y selectivos índices bibliográficos del mundo.
期刊最新文献
Síndrome de trombosis con trombocitopenia asociado a vacunas de adenovirus frente a la COVID-19: Epidemiología y presentación clínica de la serie española Validación de Neuromyotype: un teclado inteligente para la evaluación de pacientes con atrofia muscular espinal 5q Test cognitivos breves como herramienta de decisión en Atención Primaria. Estudio poblacional y de validación Estudio CORCOBIA: determinación de puntos de corte de biomarcadores de enfermedad de Alzheimer en LCR en una cohorte clínica Insomnio fatal esporádico: fenotipo PSP-like rápidamente progresivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1