你能再说一遍吗?调查感知到的通融适宜性对通融型语音助手的中介效应

Matthew J.A. Craig , Xialing Lin , Chad Edwards , Autumn Edwards
{"title":"你能再说一遍吗?调查感知到的通融适宜性对通融型语音助手的中介效应","authors":"Matthew J.A. Craig ,&nbsp;Xialing Lin ,&nbsp;Chad Edwards ,&nbsp;Autumn Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread use of Voice-Based Assistants (VBAs) in various applications has introduced a new dimension to human-machine communication. This study explores how users assess VBAs exhibiting either excessive or insufficient communication accommodation in imagined initial interactions. Drawing on Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) and the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), the present research investigates the mediation effect of perceived accommodation on the relationship between warmth and competence of the SCM and evaluations of the VBA as a communicator and a speaker. Participants evaluated the underaccommodative VBA significantly lower with respect to its communication and evaluations of the VBA as a speaker, which were indirectly predicted by warmth and competence stereotype content models via the perceived appropriateness of the communication. The implications of our findings and future research are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can you repeat that again? Investigating the mediating effects of perceived accommodation appropriateness for accommodative voice-based assistants\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J.A. Craig ,&nbsp;Xialing Lin ,&nbsp;Chad Edwards ,&nbsp;Autumn Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The widespread use of Voice-Based Assistants (VBAs) in various applications has introduced a new dimension to human-machine communication. This study explores how users assess VBAs exhibiting either excessive or insufficient communication accommodation in imagined initial interactions. Drawing on Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) and the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), the present research investigates the mediation effect of perceived accommodation on the relationship between warmth and competence of the SCM and evaluations of the VBA as a communicator and a speaker. Participants evaluated the underaccommodative VBA significantly lower with respect to its communication and evaluations of the VBA as a speaker, which were indirectly predicted by warmth and competence stereotype content models via the perceived appropriateness of the communication. The implications of our findings and future research are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语音助理(VBA)在各种应用中的广泛使用为人机交流引入了一个新的维度。本研究探讨了用户如何评价 VBA 在想象的初始互动中表现出过度或不足的交流适应性。本研究以交流适应理论(CAT)和刻板印象内容模型(SCM)为基础,探讨了感知到的适应性对单片机的热情和能力与作为交流者和演讲者的 VBA 评价之间关系的调节作用。受试者对不太通融的 VBA 的交流评价和对 VBA 作为演讲者的评价明显较低,而这是由温暖和能力刻板印象内容模型通过感知到的交流适当性间接预测的。本文讨论了我们的发现和未来研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can you repeat that again? Investigating the mediating effects of perceived accommodation appropriateness for accommodative voice-based assistants
The widespread use of Voice-Based Assistants (VBAs) in various applications has introduced a new dimension to human-machine communication. This study explores how users assess VBAs exhibiting either excessive or insufficient communication accommodation in imagined initial interactions. Drawing on Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) and the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), the present research investigates the mediation effect of perceived accommodation on the relationship between warmth and competence of the SCM and evaluations of the VBA as a communicator and a speaker. Participants evaluated the underaccommodative VBA significantly lower with respect to its communication and evaluations of the VBA as a speaker, which were indirectly predicted by warmth and competence stereotype content models via the perceived appropriateness of the communication. The implications of our findings and future research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can ChatGPT read who you are? Understanding young adults’ attitudes towards using AI chatbots for psychotherapy: The role of self-stigma Aversion against machines with complex mental abilities: The role of individual differences Differences between human and artificial/augmented intelligence in medicine Integrating sound effects and background music in Robotic storytelling – A series of online studies across different story genres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1