随机试用临床决策支持工具,加强对有阿片类药物使用障碍的高危初级保健患者的自杀筛查

Rebecca C. Rossom MD , A. Lauren Crain PhD , Gavin Bart MD , Julie E. Richards PhD , Jennifer M. Boggs PhD , Patrick J. O'Connor MD , Caitlin Borgert-Spaniol MA , Sheryl Kane MS , Stephanie A. Hooker PhD
{"title":"随机试用临床决策支持工具,加强对有阿片类药物使用障碍的高危初级保健患者的自杀筛查","authors":"Rebecca C. Rossom MD ,&nbsp;A. Lauren Crain PhD ,&nbsp;Gavin Bart MD ,&nbsp;Julie E. Richards PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Boggs PhD ,&nbsp;Patrick J. O'Connor MD ,&nbsp;Caitlin Borgert-Spaniol MA ,&nbsp;Sheryl Kane MS ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Hooker PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Individuals with opioid use disorder are at elevated suicide risk, but systematic screening in this population is rarely done. This study assessed the effects of targeted clinical decision support prompts on structured suicide risk assessment completion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study used a cluster-randomized controlled pragmatic pilot design. Adult primary care patients (aged 18–75 years) with or at risk for opioid use disorder or opioid overdose and suicide were eligible. Patients sought care from 15 Midwestern primary care clinics between July, 31, 2021 and July, 31, 2022. Data were analyzed between March and June 2023. Clinicians in intervention and control clinics received a printout from rooming staff, prompted by a clinical decision support-generated electronic health record alert, suggesting clinicians talk with patients about opioid risks. Intervention clinician handouts also alerted them to patients estimated to be at increased suicide risk and recommended completion of a Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale to further evaluate suicide risk. The handouts for control clinicians did not include suicide risk alerts. The main outcome measured the completion of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale in the 14 days following a visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 115 eligible patients (69 intervention, 46 control) made at least 1 visit to a randomized clinic. Patients mean age was 39 years, and 57% were women; 48% of patients had a high risk of opioid use disorder or opioid overdose, 39% had an opioid use disorder diagnosis, 12% had an opioid use disorder in remission diagnosis, and 5% had a recent opioid overdose. Over a mean follow-up of 249 days, 20.3% of intervention patients and 17.4% of control patients had at least 1 Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale completed in the next 14 days (<em>p</em>=0.70). Most (71%–75%) Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale scores were 0, indicating no risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This pilot study did not increase the uptake of structured suicide risk assessments in primary care for patients at elevated risk for opioid use disorder and suicide. More robust interventions are likely needed to promote suicide risk assessment in primary care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"3 6","pages":"Article 100280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Pilot of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Increase Suicide Screening for at-Risk Primary Care Patients With Opioid Use Disorder\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca C. Rossom MD ,&nbsp;A. Lauren Crain PhD ,&nbsp;Gavin Bart MD ,&nbsp;Julie E. Richards PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Boggs PhD ,&nbsp;Patrick J. O'Connor MD ,&nbsp;Caitlin Borgert-Spaniol MA ,&nbsp;Sheryl Kane MS ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Hooker PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Individuals with opioid use disorder are at elevated suicide risk, but systematic screening in this population is rarely done. This study assessed the effects of targeted clinical decision support prompts on structured suicide risk assessment completion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study used a cluster-randomized controlled pragmatic pilot design. Adult primary care patients (aged 18–75 years) with or at risk for opioid use disorder or opioid overdose and suicide were eligible. Patients sought care from 15 Midwestern primary care clinics between July, 31, 2021 and July, 31, 2022. Data were analyzed between March and June 2023. Clinicians in intervention and control clinics received a printout from rooming staff, prompted by a clinical decision support-generated electronic health record alert, suggesting clinicians talk with patients about opioid risks. Intervention clinician handouts also alerted them to patients estimated to be at increased suicide risk and recommended completion of a Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale to further evaluate suicide risk. The handouts for control clinicians did not include suicide risk alerts. The main outcome measured the completion of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale in the 14 days following a visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 115 eligible patients (69 intervention, 46 control) made at least 1 visit to a randomized clinic. Patients mean age was 39 years, and 57% were women; 48% of patients had a high risk of opioid use disorder or opioid overdose, 39% had an opioid use disorder diagnosis, 12% had an opioid use disorder in remission diagnosis, and 5% had a recent opioid overdose. Over a mean follow-up of 249 days, 20.3% of intervention patients and 17.4% of control patients had at least 1 Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale completed in the next 14 days (<em>p</em>=0.70). Most (71%–75%) Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale scores were 0, indicating no risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This pilot study did not increase the uptake of structured suicide risk assessments in primary care for patients at elevated risk for opioid use disorder and suicide. More robust interventions are likely needed to promote suicide risk assessment in primary care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJPM focus\",\"volume\":\"3 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJPM focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000981\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言阿片类药物使用障碍患者的自杀风险较高,但很少对这一人群进行系统筛查。本研究评估了有针对性的临床决策支持提示对结构化自杀风险评估完成情况的影响。患有或面临阿片类药物使用障碍或阿片类药物过量和自杀风险的成人初级保健患者(18-75 岁)均符合条件。患者于 2021 年 7 月 31 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日期间在 15 家中西部初级保健诊所就诊。数据分析时间为 2023 年 3 月至 6 月。干预诊所和对照诊所的临床医生在临床决策支持生成的电子健康记录警报的提示下,收到了来自病房工作人员的打印输出,建议临床医生与患者讨论阿片类药物的风险。干预组临床医生的讲义还提醒他们注意估计自杀风险较高的患者,并建议他们填写哥伦比亚自杀严重程度分级表,以进一步评估自杀风险。对照组临床医生的讲义不包括自杀风险提示。结果共有 115 名符合条件的患者(干预组 69 人,对照组 46 人)至少到随机诊所就诊过一次。患者的平均年龄为 39 岁,57% 为女性;48% 的患者有阿片类药物使用障碍或阿片类药物过量的高风险,39% 的患者被诊断为阿片类药物使用障碍,12% 的患者被诊断为阿片类药物使用障碍缓解期,5% 的患者近期有阿片类药物过量。在平均 249 天的随访中,20.3% 的干预患者和 17.4% 的对照组患者在接下来的 14 天内至少完成了一次哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(P=0.70)。大多数(71%-75%)哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表的评分为 0,表明没有风险。结论这项试点研究并没有提高阿片类药物使用障碍和自杀风险较高的患者在初级保健中接受结构化自杀风险评估的比例。可能需要采取更有力的干预措施来促进初级保健中的自杀风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Randomized Pilot of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Increase Suicide Screening for at-Risk Primary Care Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

Introduction

Individuals with opioid use disorder are at elevated suicide risk, but systematic screening in this population is rarely done. This study assessed the effects of targeted clinical decision support prompts on structured suicide risk assessment completion.

Methods

The study used a cluster-randomized controlled pragmatic pilot design. Adult primary care patients (aged 18–75 years) with or at risk for opioid use disorder or opioid overdose and suicide were eligible. Patients sought care from 15 Midwestern primary care clinics between July, 31, 2021 and July, 31, 2022. Data were analyzed between March and June 2023. Clinicians in intervention and control clinics received a printout from rooming staff, prompted by a clinical decision support-generated electronic health record alert, suggesting clinicians talk with patients about opioid risks. Intervention clinician handouts also alerted them to patients estimated to be at increased suicide risk and recommended completion of a Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale to further evaluate suicide risk. The handouts for control clinicians did not include suicide risk alerts. The main outcome measured the completion of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale in the 14 days following a visit.

Results

A total of 115 eligible patients (69 intervention, 46 control) made at least 1 visit to a randomized clinic. Patients mean age was 39 years, and 57% were women; 48% of patients had a high risk of opioid use disorder or opioid overdose, 39% had an opioid use disorder diagnosis, 12% had an opioid use disorder in remission diagnosis, and 5% had a recent opioid overdose. Over a mean follow-up of 249 days, 20.3% of intervention patients and 17.4% of control patients had at least 1 Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale completed in the next 14 days (p=0.70). Most (71%–75%) Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale scores were 0, indicating no risk.

Conclusions

This pilot study did not increase the uptake of structured suicide risk assessments in primary care for patients at elevated risk for opioid use disorder and suicide. More robust interventions are likely needed to promote suicide risk assessment in primary care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Estimate of Preventable Harms Associated With Screening Colonoscopy Overuse in the U.S. Food-Away-From-Home Options in Local Military Nutrition Environments Prevalence of Gun Carrying and Gun Violence Victimization and Perpetration Among a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Youth and Young Adults The Association Between a Summary Measure of Social Determinants of Health/Health Equity and Cardiovascular Disease Burden Among Mississippi Adults Determining Filipinos’ Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: Insights From a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1