可持续社会心理干预的关键是什么?尼泊尔非专业咨询项目的批判性人种学研究

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY SSM. Mental health Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100359
Parbati Shrestha , Aruna Limbu , Kusumlata Tiwari , Liana E. Chase
{"title":"可持续社会心理干预的关键是什么?尼泊尔非专业咨询项目的批判性人种学研究","authors":"Parbati Shrestha ,&nbsp;Aruna Limbu ,&nbsp;Kusumlata Tiwari ,&nbsp;Liana E. Chase","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lay counselling, or the delivery of talk-based therapeutic support by people without a clinical degree, is gaining popularity as a way of addressing global shortages of mental health professionals. In Nepal, lay counselors have made significant contributions to mental health and psychosocial care over the last two decades, particularly in the aftermath of major emergencies. However, research on the longer-term integration and sustainability of lay counselling interventions remains limited. This ethnographic study explored the meaning and importance of sustainability to different stakeholders in a lay counselling program implemented following Nepal's 2015 earthquake. We conducted participant observation in the everyday lives of five counsellors as well as four focus group discussions and 51 semi-structured interviews with counsellors and other key stakeholders. Our analysis revealed significant discrepancies in perceptions of sustainability; while organizations involved in implementing the program described it as a sustainability success due to continued government financing, counsellors emphasized their own and the government's failure to sustain high-quality service delivery in practice. Program-level barriers included inadequate budget and remuneration, lack of clinical supervision, and poor integration within existing systems. We also identified wider sociopolitical influences on sustainability, including the social positioning of counsellors, low understanding and acceptability of counselling, and a rapidly changing political landscape. These findings reveal the need for a critical approach to sustainability in global mental health, warning against superficial engagement that prioritizes continuity of government financing over quality of care and workers' rights. Advocating for an ecological orientation within sustainability research, we also discuss the importance of looking beyond program design factors to consider how local and national sociopolitical dynamics influence frontline service provision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100359"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What matters for sustainable psychosocial interventions and who decides? Critical ethnography of a lay counselling program in Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Parbati Shrestha ,&nbsp;Aruna Limbu ,&nbsp;Kusumlata Tiwari ,&nbsp;Liana E. Chase\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Lay counselling, or the delivery of talk-based therapeutic support by people without a clinical degree, is gaining popularity as a way of addressing global shortages of mental health professionals. In Nepal, lay counselors have made significant contributions to mental health and psychosocial care over the last two decades, particularly in the aftermath of major emergencies. However, research on the longer-term integration and sustainability of lay counselling interventions remains limited. This ethnographic study explored the meaning and importance of sustainability to different stakeholders in a lay counselling program implemented following Nepal's 2015 earthquake. We conducted participant observation in the everyday lives of five counsellors as well as four focus group discussions and 51 semi-structured interviews with counsellors and other key stakeholders. Our analysis revealed significant discrepancies in perceptions of sustainability; while organizations involved in implementing the program described it as a sustainability success due to continued government financing, counsellors emphasized their own and the government's failure to sustain high-quality service delivery in practice. Program-level barriers included inadequate budget and remuneration, lack of clinical supervision, and poor integration within existing systems. We also identified wider sociopolitical influences on sustainability, including the social positioning of counsellors, low understanding and acceptability of counselling, and a rapidly changing political landscape. These findings reveal the need for a critical approach to sustainability in global mental health, warning against superficial engagement that prioritizes continuity of government financing over quality of care and workers' rights. Advocating for an ecological orientation within sustainability research, we also discuss the importance of looking beyond program design factors to consider how local and national sociopolitical dynamics influence frontline service provision.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非专业心理咨询,或由没有临床学位的人提供以谈话为基础的治疗支持,作为解决全球心理健康专业人员短缺问题的一种方式,正日益受到欢迎。在尼泊尔,非专业心理咨询人员在过去二十年中为心理健康和社会心理护理做出了重大贡献,尤其是在重大突发事件之后。然而,有关非专业心理咨询干预的长期整合和可持续性的研究仍然有限。这项人种学研究探讨了在 2015 年尼泊尔地震后实施的非专业咨询项目中,可持续性对不同利益相关者的意义和重要性。我们对五位辅导员的日常生活进行了参与式观察,并与辅导员和其他主要利益相关者进行了四次焦点小组讨论和 51 次半结构式访谈。我们的分析表明,人们对可持续发展的认识存在很大差异;参与实施计划的组织认为,由于政府持续提供资金,该计划在可持续发展方面取得了成功,而辅导员则强调,他们自己和政府都未能在实践中持续提供高质量的服务。计划层面的障碍包括预算和薪酬不足、缺乏临床监督以及与现有系统整合不力。我们还发现了更广泛的社会政治因素对可持续性的影响,包括辅导员的社会定位、对辅导的低理解度和接受度以及快速变化的政治环境。这些研究结果表明,有必要对全球心理健康的可持续发展采取一种批判性的方法,警示人们不要做表面文章,将政府资助的连续性置于医疗质量和工作者权利之上。我们提倡在可持续发展研究中采用生态取向,并讨论了超越项目设计因素,考虑地方和国家社会政治动态如何影响一线服务提供的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What matters for sustainable psychosocial interventions and who decides? Critical ethnography of a lay counselling program in Nepal
Lay counselling, or the delivery of talk-based therapeutic support by people without a clinical degree, is gaining popularity as a way of addressing global shortages of mental health professionals. In Nepal, lay counselors have made significant contributions to mental health and psychosocial care over the last two decades, particularly in the aftermath of major emergencies. However, research on the longer-term integration and sustainability of lay counselling interventions remains limited. This ethnographic study explored the meaning and importance of sustainability to different stakeholders in a lay counselling program implemented following Nepal's 2015 earthquake. We conducted participant observation in the everyday lives of five counsellors as well as four focus group discussions and 51 semi-structured interviews with counsellors and other key stakeholders. Our analysis revealed significant discrepancies in perceptions of sustainability; while organizations involved in implementing the program described it as a sustainability success due to continued government financing, counsellors emphasized their own and the government's failure to sustain high-quality service delivery in practice. Program-level barriers included inadequate budget and remuneration, lack of clinical supervision, and poor integration within existing systems. We also identified wider sociopolitical influences on sustainability, including the social positioning of counsellors, low understanding and acceptability of counselling, and a rapidly changing political landscape. These findings reveal the need for a critical approach to sustainability in global mental health, warning against superficial engagement that prioritizes continuity of government financing over quality of care and workers' rights. Advocating for an ecological orientation within sustainability research, we also discuss the importance of looking beyond program design factors to consider how local and national sociopolitical dynamics influence frontline service provision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of type 1 diabetes complications, mental health, and structural pathways of complications occurrence among young people (14–24 years) and caregivers in southern Ghana Opioid risk-reduction strategies for people with HIV on chronic opioid therapy: A qualitative study of patient perspectives Factors associated with mental health outcomes among peer refugee helpers in Greece: Results from a cross-sectional study Community mental health for migrant women in Barcelona (“Self-Care Among Women”): Protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot psychological intervention What matters for sustainable psychosocial interventions and who decides? Critical ethnography of a lay counselling program in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1