揭示自杀行为的接触和社会接近程度对年轻一代求助行为的影响

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY SSM. Mental health Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100357
Sijia Li , Alvin Junus , Paul Siu Fai Yip
{"title":"揭示自杀行为的接触和社会接近程度对年轻一代求助行为的影响","authors":"Sijia Li ,&nbsp;Alvin Junus ,&nbsp;Paul Siu Fai Yip","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Each suicide affects a wide circle of individuals and increases in suicide rate imply that a larger share of the population would be exposed to suicidality. This exposure may alter individuals' tendency to seek help when they face distress and is influenced by social proximity. However, limited evidence has clarified the direct and moderating effect of social proximity to suicidality on help-seeking behavior. Data were collected from a population-representative survey conducted in 2021. We recruited 1501 individuals aged 11–35 years with random sampling through mobile phone numbers. Exposure and social proximity to suicidality were measured as independent variables and help-seeking behaviors were outcomes, along with sociodemographics, psychological distress, and mental health risks as covariates. We employed latent class analysis to identify help-seeking behavior patterns and conducted multinomial logistic regressions with a three-way interaction to investigate the direct and moderating effects of social proximity to suicide ideation (SI), self-harm (SH), and suicide attempt (SA) on each help-seeking behavior pattern separately. Each unit increase in social proximity to SH was associated with a 30.9% higher likelihood of seeking help from family, friends, and partners even after controlling for distress and mental health risks. Furthermore, the three-way interaction (<em>β</em><sub>123</sub> = 0.041, 95% CI [0.014, 0.069]) suggested joint moderating effects of social proximity among people who did not rely on family. The effect of social proximity to any single stage of suicidality was amplified only when people were not exposed to the other two stages. Closer social proximity to suicidality could heighten the probability of individuals seeking help from family, friends, and partners regardless of distress level, with SH exposure's effects being stronger than SI's and SA's. Initial exposure to any single stage of suicidality could have a stronger effect than subsequent exposures among individuals who did not rely on family.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100357"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the impacts of exposure and social proximity to suicidality on help-seeking behavior among the young generation\",\"authors\":\"Sijia Li ,&nbsp;Alvin Junus ,&nbsp;Paul Siu Fai Yip\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Each suicide affects a wide circle of individuals and increases in suicide rate imply that a larger share of the population would be exposed to suicidality. This exposure may alter individuals' tendency to seek help when they face distress and is influenced by social proximity. However, limited evidence has clarified the direct and moderating effect of social proximity to suicidality on help-seeking behavior. Data were collected from a population-representative survey conducted in 2021. We recruited 1501 individuals aged 11–35 years with random sampling through mobile phone numbers. Exposure and social proximity to suicidality were measured as independent variables and help-seeking behaviors were outcomes, along with sociodemographics, psychological distress, and mental health risks as covariates. We employed latent class analysis to identify help-seeking behavior patterns and conducted multinomial logistic regressions with a three-way interaction to investigate the direct and moderating effects of social proximity to suicide ideation (SI), self-harm (SH), and suicide attempt (SA) on each help-seeking behavior pattern separately. Each unit increase in social proximity to SH was associated with a 30.9% higher likelihood of seeking help from family, friends, and partners even after controlling for distress and mental health risks. Furthermore, the three-way interaction (<em>β</em><sub>123</sub> = 0.041, 95% CI [0.014, 0.069]) suggested joint moderating effects of social proximity among people who did not rely on family. The effect of social proximity to any single stage of suicidality was amplified only when people were not exposed to the other two stages. Closer social proximity to suicidality could heighten the probability of individuals seeking help from family, friends, and partners regardless of distress level, with SH exposure's effects being stronger than SI's and SA's. Initial exposure to any single stage of suicidality could have a stronger effect than subsequent exposures among individuals who did not rely on family.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每一起自杀事件都会影响到广泛的人群,自杀率的上升意味着更多的人群会受到自杀倾向的影响。这种接触可能会改变个人在面临困境时寻求帮助的倾向,并受到社会邻近性的影响。然而,关于自杀倾向的社会接近性对求助行为的直接影响和调节作用,目前明确的证据还很有限。我们从 2021 年进行的一项具有人口代表性的调查中收集了数据。我们通过手机号码随机抽样,招募了 1501 名 11-35 岁的人。自杀倾向的暴露和社会接近性作为自变量,求助行为作为结果,社会人口统计学、心理困扰和心理健康风险作为协变量。我们采用潜类分析来识别求助行为模式,并通过三方交互作用进行多项式逻辑回归,分别研究自杀意念(SI)、自残(SH)和自杀未遂(SA)的社会接近性对每种求助行为模式的直接影响和调节作用。自杀意念(SI)的社会接近度每增加一个单位,向家人、朋友和伴侣寻求帮助的可能性就会增加 30.9%,即使在控制了痛苦和心理健康风险之后也是如此。此外,三方交互作用(β123 = 0.041,95% CI [0.014,0.069])表明,在不依赖家庭的人群中,社会亲近度具有共同的调节作用。只有当人们没有经历其他两个阶段时,社会接近性对任何一个自杀阶段的影响才会被放大。无论自杀者的痛苦程度如何,自杀倾向的社会接近性都会提高他们向家人、朋友和伴侣寻求帮助的概率,其中SH暴露的影响要强于SI和SA暴露的影响。对于那些不依赖家人的人来说,最初接触任何一个自杀阶段的影响都可能比随后接触自杀阶段的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unveiling the impacts of exposure and social proximity to suicidality on help-seeking behavior among the young generation
Each suicide affects a wide circle of individuals and increases in suicide rate imply that a larger share of the population would be exposed to suicidality. This exposure may alter individuals' tendency to seek help when they face distress and is influenced by social proximity. However, limited evidence has clarified the direct and moderating effect of social proximity to suicidality on help-seeking behavior. Data were collected from a population-representative survey conducted in 2021. We recruited 1501 individuals aged 11–35 years with random sampling through mobile phone numbers. Exposure and social proximity to suicidality were measured as independent variables and help-seeking behaviors were outcomes, along with sociodemographics, psychological distress, and mental health risks as covariates. We employed latent class analysis to identify help-seeking behavior patterns and conducted multinomial logistic regressions with a three-way interaction to investigate the direct and moderating effects of social proximity to suicide ideation (SI), self-harm (SH), and suicide attempt (SA) on each help-seeking behavior pattern separately. Each unit increase in social proximity to SH was associated with a 30.9% higher likelihood of seeking help from family, friends, and partners even after controlling for distress and mental health risks. Furthermore, the three-way interaction (β123 = 0.041, 95% CI [0.014, 0.069]) suggested joint moderating effects of social proximity among people who did not rely on family. The effect of social proximity to any single stage of suicidality was amplified only when people were not exposed to the other two stages. Closer social proximity to suicidality could heighten the probability of individuals seeking help from family, friends, and partners regardless of distress level, with SH exposure's effects being stronger than SI's and SA's. Initial exposure to any single stage of suicidality could have a stronger effect than subsequent exposures among individuals who did not rely on family.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
The social construction of mental illness stigma amongst Asians: A systematic review and meta-ethnography Exploring the societal implications of digital mental health technologies: A critical review Juggling to stay afloat: Debt and health under financialization Developing an explanatory model of alcohol misuse among South Sudanese refugees in northern Uganda: A qualitative study A qualitative study of type 1 diabetes complications, mental health, and structural pathways of complications occurrence among young people (14–24 years) and caregivers in southern Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1