预测性阿尔茨海默病诊断中的咨询和披露实践:范围综述。

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1002/alz.14365
Julia Perry, Katrin Radenbach, Katharina Geschke, Ayda Rostamzadeh
{"title":"预测性阿尔茨海默病诊断中的咨询和披露实践:范围综述。","authors":"Julia Perry, Katrin Radenbach, Katharina Geschke, Ayda Rostamzadeh","doi":"10.1002/alz.14365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New possibilities of biomarker-based predictive technologies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have become more reliable as well as more accessible. Standardized clinical recommendations and guidance for counseling and disclosure in this context are not yet well developed. Our scoping review identified publications from database searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, LIVIVO, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were: (1) information or counseling, (2) biomarkers and a type of cognitive impairment or AD, and (3) published between 2005 and 2024. We identified 63 articles and synthesized them along the categories of staged information provision: pre-test counseling, disclosure, and post-disclosure follow-up. Most publications referred to the context of disclosure (48), followed by pre-test counseling (33), and post-disclosure follow-up (31). Some publications referred to all stages of counseling (17). Our findings highlight the need to further develop and specify comprehensive and standardized guidelines for counseling, disclosure, and post-disclosure follow-up in the context of AD biomarker testing. HIGHLIGHTS: New possibilities of biomarker-based predictive technologies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have become more reliable and also more accessible. However, clinical recommendations and guidance for counseling and disclosure in the context of AD biomarker testing are currently not well developed. We carried out a scoping review with the aim to generate an overview of the scientific literature and guidance available regarding counseling, biomarker test result and dementia risk disclosure, and clinical management prior to and in the course of a biomarker-based diagnosis in early stages of AD. We identified 63 relevant articles. Most publications referred to the context of disclosure (48), followed by pre-test counseling (33), and post-disclosure follow-up (31). Some publications referred to all stages of counseling (17). Our findings highlight the urgent need for national and international consensus guidelines for comprehensive and staged counseling and disclosure practices. While most publications identify relevant ethical challenges posed for counseling practices in the context of AD biomarker testing, they rarely present any practical recommendations for clinicians, on how and what to counsel on a concrete level.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counseling and disclosure practices in predictive Alzheimer's disease diagnostics: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Perry, Katrin Radenbach, Katharina Geschke, Ayda Rostamzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alz.14365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>New possibilities of biomarker-based predictive technologies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have become more reliable as well as more accessible. Standardized clinical recommendations and guidance for counseling and disclosure in this context are not yet well developed. Our scoping review identified publications from database searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, LIVIVO, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were: (1) information or counseling, (2) biomarkers and a type of cognitive impairment or AD, and (3) published between 2005 and 2024. We identified 63 articles and synthesized them along the categories of staged information provision: pre-test counseling, disclosure, and post-disclosure follow-up. Most publications referred to the context of disclosure (48), followed by pre-test counseling (33), and post-disclosure follow-up (31). Some publications referred to all stages of counseling (17). Our findings highlight the need to further develop and specify comprehensive and standardized guidelines for counseling, disclosure, and post-disclosure follow-up in the context of AD biomarker testing. HIGHLIGHTS: New possibilities of biomarker-based predictive technologies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have become more reliable and also more accessible. However, clinical recommendations and guidance for counseling and disclosure in the context of AD biomarker testing are currently not well developed. We carried out a scoping review with the aim to generate an overview of the scientific literature and guidance available regarding counseling, biomarker test result and dementia risk disclosure, and clinical management prior to and in the course of a biomarker-based diagnosis in early stages of AD. We identified 63 relevant articles. Most publications referred to the context of disclosure (48), followed by pre-test counseling (33), and post-disclosure follow-up (31). Some publications referred to all stages of counseling (17). Our findings highlight the urgent need for national and international consensus guidelines for comprehensive and staged counseling and disclosure practices. While most publications identify relevant ethical challenges posed for counseling practices in the context of AD biomarker testing, they rarely present any practical recommendations for clinicians, on how and what to counsel on a concrete level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14365\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于生物标志物的阿尔茨海默病(AD)新预测技术已变得越来越可靠,也越来越容易获得。在这种情况下,标准化的临床建议以及咨询和信息披露指南尚未完善。我们的范围界定审查从 PubMed、PsycINFO、LIVIVO 和 Web of Science 的数据库检索中确定了相关出版物。纳入标准为(1) 信息或咨询;(2) 生物标志物和认知障碍或注意力缺失症的类型;(3) 发表于 2005 年至 2024 年之间。我们确定了 63 篇文章,并按照分阶段提供信息的类别对其进行了归纳:测试前咨询、信息披露和披露后跟踪。大多数出版物都提到了信息披露(48 篇),其次是测试前咨询(33 篇)和披露后跟踪(31 篇)。一些出版物提到了咨询的所有阶段(17)。我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要进一步制定和明确有关AD生物标志物检测的咨询、信息披露和披露后随访的全面和标准化指南。亮点:基于生物标志物的阿尔茨海默病(AD)预测技术已经变得越来越可靠,也越来越容易获得。然而,目前针对阿尔茨海默病生物标志物检测的咨询和信息披露的临床建议和指导还不完善。我们进行了一次范围界定综述,目的是对有关咨询、生物标志物检测结果和痴呆症风险披露以及在基于生物标志物的早期 AD 诊断之前和过程中的临床管理的科学文献和指南进行概述。我们确定了 63 篇相关文章。大多数文章提到了披露的背景(48 篇),其次是测试前咨询(33 篇)和披露后随访(31 篇)。一些出版物提到了咨询的所有阶段(17 篇)。我们的研究结果突出表明,迫切需要制定国家和国际共识指南,以指导全面和分阶段的咨询和披露实践。虽然大多数出版物都指出了在AD生物标记物检测背景下咨询实践所面临的相关伦理挑战,但它们很少为临床医生提供任何实用建议,说明如何以及如何进行具体的咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Counseling and disclosure practices in predictive Alzheimer's disease diagnostics: A scoping review.

New possibilities of biomarker-based predictive technologies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have become more reliable as well as more accessible. Standardized clinical recommendations and guidance for counseling and disclosure in this context are not yet well developed. Our scoping review identified publications from database searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, LIVIVO, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were: (1) information or counseling, (2) biomarkers and a type of cognitive impairment or AD, and (3) published between 2005 and 2024. We identified 63 articles and synthesized them along the categories of staged information provision: pre-test counseling, disclosure, and post-disclosure follow-up. Most publications referred to the context of disclosure (48), followed by pre-test counseling (33), and post-disclosure follow-up (31). Some publications referred to all stages of counseling (17). Our findings highlight the need to further develop and specify comprehensive and standardized guidelines for counseling, disclosure, and post-disclosure follow-up in the context of AD biomarker testing. HIGHLIGHTS: New possibilities of biomarker-based predictive technologies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have become more reliable and also more accessible. However, clinical recommendations and guidance for counseling and disclosure in the context of AD biomarker testing are currently not well developed. We carried out a scoping review with the aim to generate an overview of the scientific literature and guidance available regarding counseling, biomarker test result and dementia risk disclosure, and clinical management prior to and in the course of a biomarker-based diagnosis in early stages of AD. We identified 63 relevant articles. Most publications referred to the context of disclosure (48), followed by pre-test counseling (33), and post-disclosure follow-up (31). Some publications referred to all stages of counseling (17). Our findings highlight the urgent need for national and international consensus guidelines for comprehensive and staged counseling and disclosure practices. While most publications identify relevant ethical challenges posed for counseling practices in the context of AD biomarker testing, they rarely present any practical recommendations for clinicians, on how and what to counsel on a concrete level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Heritability of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers: A nuclear twin family design Elevated locus coeruleus metabolism provides resilience against cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease The Consortium for Clarity in ADRD Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI) Communication Bridge-2 randomized controlled trial: Recruitment and baseline features Prevalence of mixed neuropathologies in age-related neurodegenerative diseases: A community-based autopsy study in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1