拒绝不平等会鼓励绿色消费吗?权力距离信念对有机食品消费的影响》。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107764
Ali Gohary, Fatima Madani, David Sugianto Lie, Eugene Y Chan
{"title":"拒绝不平等会鼓励绿色消费吗?权力距离信念对有机食品消费的影响》。","authors":"Ali Gohary, Fatima Madani, David Sugianto Lie, Eugene Y Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rapid increase in the consumption of organic food, there has also been a growing interest in developing a nuanced understanding of the many different drivers of this consumption trend. Although many studies examine people's motives for consuming organic food, the role of culture has received limited attention. The present research examines the hitherto unexplored role of power distance belief (PDB)-the extent to which people accept and endorse social hierarchy- on consumers' organic food preferences and purchases. Across five studies, comprising both real and hypothetical purchases, we find that, due to their greater environmental concerns, low PDB consumers have a greater preference for organic foods than do high PDB consumers. We also demonstrate two strategies that motivate high PDB consumers to purchase more organic foods. Specifically, we show that high PDB consumers purchase organic foods more when environmental issues reduce society's power distance in the future. Moreover, high PDB consumers reported greater organic food consumption when primed with low (vs. high) level construal. We conclude the paper with the implications of these findings for policymakers and businesses in terms of, for example, their segmentation, targeting, and promotion strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107764"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Rejection of Inequality Encourage Green Consumption? The Effect of Power Distance Belief on Organic Food Consumption.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Gohary, Fatima Madani, David Sugianto Lie, Eugene Y Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the rapid increase in the consumption of organic food, there has also been a growing interest in developing a nuanced understanding of the many different drivers of this consumption trend. Although many studies examine people's motives for consuming organic food, the role of culture has received limited attention. The present research examines the hitherto unexplored role of power distance belief (PDB)-the extent to which people accept and endorse social hierarchy- on consumers' organic food preferences and purchases. Across five studies, comprising both real and hypothetical purchases, we find that, due to their greater environmental concerns, low PDB consumers have a greater preference for organic foods than do high PDB consumers. We also demonstrate two strategies that motivate high PDB consumers to purchase more organic foods. Specifically, we show that high PDB consumers purchase organic foods more when environmental issues reduce society's power distance in the future. Moreover, high PDB consumers reported greater organic food consumption when primed with low (vs. high) level construal. We conclude the paper with the implications of these findings for policymakers and businesses in terms of, for example, their segmentation, targeting, and promotion strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107764\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着有机食品消费量的快速增长,人们对深入了解这一消费趋势的多种不同驱动因素的兴趣也日益浓厚。尽管许多研究都探讨了人们消费有机食品的动机,但对文化的作用却关注有限。本研究探讨了权力距离信念(PDB)--即人们接受和认可社会等级制度的程度--对消费者有机食品偏好和购买的影响,这是迄今为止尚未探索过的。通过五项研究(包括真实购买和假设购买),我们发现,与高权力距离信念的消费者相比,低权力距离信念的消费者由于更关注环境问题而更偏好有机食品。我们还展示了促使高 PDB 消费者购买更多有机食品的两种策略。具体来说,我们表明,当环境问题减少了未来社会的权力距离时,高 PDB 消费者会购买更多的有机食品。此外,高 PDB 消费者在低水平(与高水平)构想的诱导下会购买更多的有机食品。最后,我们总结了这些发现对政策制定者和企业在细分市场、目标定位和促销策略等方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Rejection of Inequality Encourage Green Consumption? The Effect of Power Distance Belief on Organic Food Consumption.

With the rapid increase in the consumption of organic food, there has also been a growing interest in developing a nuanced understanding of the many different drivers of this consumption trend. Although many studies examine people's motives for consuming organic food, the role of culture has received limited attention. The present research examines the hitherto unexplored role of power distance belief (PDB)-the extent to which people accept and endorse social hierarchy- on consumers' organic food preferences and purchases. Across five studies, comprising both real and hypothetical purchases, we find that, due to their greater environmental concerns, low PDB consumers have a greater preference for organic foods than do high PDB consumers. We also demonstrate two strategies that motivate high PDB consumers to purchase more organic foods. Specifically, we show that high PDB consumers purchase organic foods more when environmental issues reduce society's power distance in the future. Moreover, high PDB consumers reported greater organic food consumption when primed with low (vs. high) level construal. We conclude the paper with the implications of these findings for policymakers and businesses in terms of, for example, their segmentation, targeting, and promotion strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Does Rejection of Inequality Encourage Green Consumption? The Effect of Power Distance Belief on Organic Food Consumption. "Flavor, fun, and vitamins"? Consumers' Lay Beliefs About Child-Oriented Food Products. Association of Maternal Immigration Status with Emotional Eating in Taiwanese Children: The Mediating Roles of Health Literacy and Feeding Practices. Weight Discrimination as a Predictor of Stress and Eating: The Role of Identifying as "Fat". Food rejection is associated with tactile sensitivity and tactile appreciation in three-year-old children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1