怀孕吸烟者中可燃烟草和电子烟双重使用的普遍性:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20746-9
Ganesh Bushi, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Ashok Kumar Balaraman, Suhas Ballal, Pooja Bansal, Balvir S Tomar, Ayash Ashraf, M Ravi Kumar, Aashna Sinha, Pramod Rawat, Abhay M Gaidhane, Sanjit Sah, Rukshar Syed, Gajendra Sharma, Rachana Mehta, Mona Thangamma A G, Nagavalli Chilakam, Sakshi Pandey, Manvinder Brar, Muhammed Shabil
{"title":"怀孕吸烟者中可燃烟草和电子烟双重使用的普遍性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ganesh Bushi, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Ashok Kumar Balaraman, Suhas Ballal, Pooja Bansal, Balvir S Tomar, Ayash Ashraf, M Ravi Kumar, Aashna Sinha, Pramod Rawat, Abhay M Gaidhane, Sanjit Sah, Rukshar Syed, Gajendra Sharma, Rachana Mehta, Mona Thangamma A G, Nagavalli Chilakam, Sakshi Pandey, Manvinder Brar, Muhammed Shabil","doi":"10.1186/s12889-024-20746-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As e-cigarettes gain popularity as potential tobacco cessation aids, concerns arise about their dual use with traditional cigarettes, especially among pregnant women, potentially subjecting both women and fetuses to heightened risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the overall prevalence of dual use of tobacco smoking and e-cigarette use in pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane on October 20, 2023. The included studies reported the number of pregnant women and the count of those who were dual users. Quality assessment was undertaken using the JBI tool. The pooled prevalence of dual use was determined via a random-effects model. All statistical analyses were executed using R software, version 4.3.</p><p><strong>Prospero: </strong>CRD42023486020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were analyzed, encompassing 5,983,363 pregnant women. The meta-analysis indicated an overall prevalence of 4.6% (95% CI: 2.0-10.3) for dual users with significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 100%). Subgroup analysis based on the country showed a prevalence of 4.9% (95% CI: 2.0 to 11.6) for USA and 8.1% (95% CI: 0.00 to 1.00) for UK. Meta-regression revealed reduction of prevalence of dual use from 2019 to 2023. A potential publication bias was indicated by the LFK index and the Doi plot.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dual consumption of e-cigarettes and traditional tobacco in pregnant women is a significant health concern, with a notable prevalence. Given the established risks of tobacco smoking during pregnancy and the uncertainties surrounding e-cigarettes, more comprehensive research and public health interventions are urgently needed to address this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"3200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of dual use of combustible tobacco and E-cigarettes among pregnant smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ganesh Bushi, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Ashok Kumar Balaraman, Suhas Ballal, Pooja Bansal, Balvir S Tomar, Ayash Ashraf, M Ravi Kumar, Aashna Sinha, Pramod Rawat, Abhay M Gaidhane, Sanjit Sah, Rukshar Syed, Gajendra Sharma, Rachana Mehta, Mona Thangamma A G, Nagavalli Chilakam, Sakshi Pandey, Manvinder Brar, Muhammed Shabil\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-024-20746-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As e-cigarettes gain popularity as potential tobacco cessation aids, concerns arise about their dual use with traditional cigarettes, especially among pregnant women, potentially subjecting both women and fetuses to heightened risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the overall prevalence of dual use of tobacco smoking and e-cigarette use in pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane on October 20, 2023. The included studies reported the number of pregnant women and the count of those who were dual users. Quality assessment was undertaken using the JBI tool. The pooled prevalence of dual use was determined via a random-effects model. All statistical analyses were executed using R software, version 4.3.</p><p><strong>Prospero: </strong>CRD42023486020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were analyzed, encompassing 5,983,363 pregnant women. The meta-analysis indicated an overall prevalence of 4.6% (95% CI: 2.0-10.3) for dual users with significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 100%). Subgroup analysis based on the country showed a prevalence of 4.9% (95% CI: 2.0 to 11.6) for USA and 8.1% (95% CI: 0.00 to 1.00) for UK. Meta-regression revealed reduction of prevalence of dual use from 2019 to 2023. A potential publication bias was indicated by the LFK index and the Doi plot.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dual consumption of e-cigarettes and traditional tobacco in pregnant women is a significant health concern, with a notable prevalence. Given the established risks of tobacco smoking during pregnancy and the uncertainties surrounding e-cigarettes, more comprehensive research and public health interventions are urgently needed to address this issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"3200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20746-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20746-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着电子烟作为潜在的戒烟辅助工具越来越受欢迎,人们对其与传统香烟的双重使用产生了担忧,尤其是在孕妇中,这可能会使妇女和胎儿面临更高的风险。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定孕妇双重使用烟草和电子烟的总体流行率:于 2023 年 10 月 20 日在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 等数据库中进行了文献检索。纳入的研究报告了孕妇人数和双重使用者人数。使用 JBI 工具进行了质量评估。通过随机效应模型确定了双重使用的汇总流行率。所有统计分析均使用 4.3.Prospero 版 R 软件进行:CRD42023486020.Results:结果:共分析了 18 项研究,涉及 5,983,363 名孕妇。荟萃分析表明,双重使用者的总体患病率为 4.6%(95% CI:2.0-10.3),异质性显著(I2 = 100%)。基于国家的分组分析显示,美国的患病率为 4.9%(95% CI:2.0-11.6),英国为 8.1%(95% CI:0.00-1.00)。元回归显示,从 2019 年到 2023 年,双重用途的流行率有所下降。LFK指数和Doi图显示了潜在的发表偏倚:孕妇同时吸食电子烟和传统烟草是一个重要的健康问题,其流行率很高。鉴于孕期吸烟的既定风险和电子烟的不确定性,迫切需要更全面的研究和公共卫生干预措施来解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of dual use of combustible tobacco and E-cigarettes among pregnant smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: As e-cigarettes gain popularity as potential tobacco cessation aids, concerns arise about their dual use with traditional cigarettes, especially among pregnant women, potentially subjecting both women and fetuses to heightened risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the overall prevalence of dual use of tobacco smoking and e-cigarette use in pregnant women.

Methods: A literature search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane on October 20, 2023. The included studies reported the number of pregnant women and the count of those who were dual users. Quality assessment was undertaken using the JBI tool. The pooled prevalence of dual use was determined via a random-effects model. All statistical analyses were executed using R software, version 4.3.

Prospero: CRD42023486020.

Results: Eighteen studies were analyzed, encompassing 5,983,363 pregnant women. The meta-analysis indicated an overall prevalence of 4.6% (95% CI: 2.0-10.3) for dual users with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 100%). Subgroup analysis based on the country showed a prevalence of 4.9% (95% CI: 2.0 to 11.6) for USA and 8.1% (95% CI: 0.00 to 1.00) for UK. Meta-regression revealed reduction of prevalence of dual use from 2019 to 2023. A potential publication bias was indicated by the LFK index and the Doi plot.

Conclusion: The dual consumption of e-cigarettes and traditional tobacco in pregnant women is a significant health concern, with a notable prevalence. Given the established risks of tobacco smoking during pregnancy and the uncertainties surrounding e-cigarettes, more comprehensive research and public health interventions are urgently needed to address this issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Association between intergenerational contact and cognitive function in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: The mediating role of functional disability and depressive symptoms. Evaluating Senegal's COVID-19 surveillance system for early detection and response: lessons from the Keur Massar district, March 03, 2020 to May 31, 2022. Measuring general health literacy using the HLS19-Q12 in specialty consultations in Spain. ''Practices and factors affecting on-site medical equipment maintenance at Wau Teaching Hospital, South Sudan''. Correction: Spatial Markov matrices for measuring the spatial dependencies of an epidemiological spread: case Covid'19 Madagascar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1