{"title":"左心室射血分数超过 40 的心力衰竭患者心率和氧脉搏反应的预后价值。","authors":"Mika Tashiro, Ayumi Goda, Yoshiaki Yanagisawa, Ryo Nakamaru, Sayaka Funabashi, Shinsuke Takeuchi, Kyoko Soejima, Takashi Kohno","doi":"10.1007/s00392-024-02577-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Heart rate (HR) and stroke volume (SV)-the components of cardiac output-have a complementary relationship. Poor HR increase during exercise is associated with poor exercise tolerance in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its prognostic impact remains unclear. Furthermore, whether the compensation for poor HR increase with SV during exercise is associated with prognosis remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 129 consecutive hospitalized HF patients with sinus rhythm and left ventricular ejection fractions > 40% who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing before discharge from the index hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (age: 66 [55-74] years; 73% male) were divided into four groups by median HR reserve (HRR; peak-rest HR: 34 bpm) and O<sub>2</sub> pulse, a surrogate for SV, reserve (peak-rest O<sub>2</sub> pulse: 4.8 mL/beat). During a mean follow-up of 562 [294-961] days, cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death and/or HF rehospitalizations) occurred in 24 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis identified significant differences in outcomes among the four groups (χ<sup>2</sup> = 27.3, p < 0.001). Using the preserved HRR/preserved O<sub>2</sub> pulse reserve group (n = 33) as a reference, the impaired HRR/impaired O<sub>2</sub> pulse reserve group (n = 37) was associated with poor outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio: 5.66, 95% CI 1.15-27.74, p = 0.033), whereas the impaired HRR/preserved O<sub>2</sub> pulse reserve group (n = 31) was not (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.38, 95% CI 0.03 to 4.76, p = 0.455).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overlap of lower increases in HR and O<sub>2</sub> pulse, a surrogate for SV, during exercise was associated with an extremely poor prognosis in HFpEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of heart rate and oxygen pulse response in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction over 40.\",\"authors\":\"Mika Tashiro, Ayumi Goda, Yoshiaki Yanagisawa, Ryo Nakamaru, Sayaka Funabashi, Shinsuke Takeuchi, Kyoko Soejima, Takashi Kohno\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00392-024-02577-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Heart rate (HR) and stroke volume (SV)-the components of cardiac output-have a complementary relationship. Poor HR increase during exercise is associated with poor exercise tolerance in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its prognostic impact remains unclear. Furthermore, whether the compensation for poor HR increase with SV during exercise is associated with prognosis remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 129 consecutive hospitalized HF patients with sinus rhythm and left ventricular ejection fractions > 40% who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing before discharge from the index hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (age: 66 [55-74] years; 73% male) were divided into four groups by median HR reserve (HRR; peak-rest HR: 34 bpm) and O<sub>2</sub> pulse, a surrogate for SV, reserve (peak-rest O<sub>2</sub> pulse: 4.8 mL/beat). During a mean follow-up of 562 [294-961] days, cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death and/or HF rehospitalizations) occurred in 24 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis identified significant differences in outcomes among the four groups (χ<sup>2</sup> = 27.3, p < 0.001). Using the preserved HRR/preserved O<sub>2</sub> pulse reserve group (n = 33) as a reference, the impaired HRR/impaired O<sub>2</sub> pulse reserve group (n = 37) was associated with poor outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio: 5.66, 95% CI 1.15-27.74, p = 0.033), whereas the impaired HRR/preserved O<sub>2</sub> pulse reserve group (n = 31) was not (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.38, 95% CI 0.03 to 4.76, p = 0.455).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overlap of lower increases in HR and O<sub>2</sub> pulse, a surrogate for SV, during exercise was associated with an extremely poor prognosis in HFpEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02577-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02577-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognostic value of heart rate and oxygen pulse response in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction over 40.
Backgrounds: Heart rate (HR) and stroke volume (SV)-the components of cardiac output-have a complementary relationship. Poor HR increase during exercise is associated with poor exercise tolerance in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its prognostic impact remains unclear. Furthermore, whether the compensation for poor HR increase with SV during exercise is associated with prognosis remains unknown.
Methods: We evaluated 129 consecutive hospitalized HF patients with sinus rhythm and left ventricular ejection fractions > 40% who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing before discharge from the index hospitalization.
Results: Patients (age: 66 [55-74] years; 73% male) were divided into four groups by median HR reserve (HRR; peak-rest HR: 34 bpm) and O2 pulse, a surrogate for SV, reserve (peak-rest O2 pulse: 4.8 mL/beat). During a mean follow-up of 562 [294-961] days, cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death and/or HF rehospitalizations) occurred in 24 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis identified significant differences in outcomes among the four groups (χ2 = 27.3, p < 0.001). Using the preserved HRR/preserved O2 pulse reserve group (n = 33) as a reference, the impaired HRR/impaired O2 pulse reserve group (n = 37) was associated with poor outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio: 5.66, 95% CI 1.15-27.74, p = 0.033), whereas the impaired HRR/preserved O2 pulse reserve group (n = 31) was not (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.38, 95% CI 0.03 to 4.76, p = 0.455).
Conclusion: The overlap of lower increases in HR and O2 pulse, a surrogate for SV, during exercise was associated with an extremely poor prognosis in HFpEF.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery.
As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.