患者在线内镜检查教育平台提高了门诊病人肠道准备质量:回顾性观察研究。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2441-8166
Yuming Ding, Ann Vandeleur, Gonzalo Chinchilla, Kimberley Littlemore, Ruth Hodgson, Tony Rahman
{"title":"患者在线内镜检查教育平台提高了门诊病人肠道准备质量:回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Yuming Ding, Ann Vandeleur, Gonzalo Chinchilla, Kimberley Littlemore, Ruth Hodgson, Tony Rahman","doi":"10.1055/a-2441-8166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> High-quality bowel preparation is integral to high-quality colonoscopy and adenoma detection. Studies evaluating the effect of pre-colonoscopy educational videos on bowel preparation quality have been variable. We investigated whether augmenting bowel preparation education using our professionally produced, patient-oriented, online educational video series would improve preparation quality, reduce need for repeat procedures, and improve adenoma detection rate (ADR). <b>Patients and methods</b> We conducted a pilot, retrospective, single-center observational study using endoscopy data from a tertiary hospital. Colonoscopy outcomes were compared between two discrete 6-month study periods, before (control group) and after (video group) implementation of the online video intervention. All patients received standard-of-care written and verbal instructions. The video group received a link providing access to the video platform. Primary outcome was adequacy of bowel preparation (defined by the Aronchick Scale). Secondary outcomes included rate of repeat colonoscopy due to inadequate preparation, ADR, and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate. <b>Results</b> The video intervention group had a lower rate of inadequate bowel preparation compared with the control group (6.3% vs 9.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.018). There was no difference between groups in rate of repeat colonoscopies due to inadequate preparation ( <i>P</i> = 0.62), ADR ( <i>P</i> = 0.11), or SSL detection rate ( <i>P</i> = 0.94). Multivariable analysis did not reveal any independent predictors of bowel preparation quality. <b>Conclusions</b> Our study supports the addition of a novel patient-oriented online educational video resource as an effective tool in enhancing bowel preparation adequacy while maintaining provision of high-quality colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 11","pages":"E1326-E1333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online patient endoscopy education platform improves outpatient bowel preparation quality: Retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuming Ding, Ann Vandeleur, Gonzalo Chinchilla, Kimberley Littlemore, Ruth Hodgson, Tony Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2441-8166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> High-quality bowel preparation is integral to high-quality colonoscopy and adenoma detection. Studies evaluating the effect of pre-colonoscopy educational videos on bowel preparation quality have been variable. We investigated whether augmenting bowel preparation education using our professionally produced, patient-oriented, online educational video series would improve preparation quality, reduce need for repeat procedures, and improve adenoma detection rate (ADR). <b>Patients and methods</b> We conducted a pilot, retrospective, single-center observational study using endoscopy data from a tertiary hospital. Colonoscopy outcomes were compared between two discrete 6-month study periods, before (control group) and after (video group) implementation of the online video intervention. All patients received standard-of-care written and verbal instructions. The video group received a link providing access to the video platform. Primary outcome was adequacy of bowel preparation (defined by the Aronchick Scale). Secondary outcomes included rate of repeat colonoscopy due to inadequate preparation, ADR, and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate. <b>Results</b> The video intervention group had a lower rate of inadequate bowel preparation compared with the control group (6.3% vs 9.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.018). There was no difference between groups in rate of repeat colonoscopies due to inadequate preparation ( <i>P</i> = 0.62), ADR ( <i>P</i> = 0.11), or SSL detection rate ( <i>P</i> = 0.94). Multivariable analysis did not reveal any independent predictors of bowel preparation quality. <b>Conclusions</b> Our study supports the addition of a novel patient-oriented online educational video resource as an effective tool in enhancing bowel preparation adequacy while maintaining provision of high-quality colonoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"E1326-E1333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2441-8166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2441-8166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 高质量的肠道准备是高质量结肠镜检查和腺瘤检测不可或缺的一部分。评估结肠镜检查前教育视频对肠道准备质量的影响的研究各不相同。我们研究了使用我们专业制作的、以患者为导向的在线教育视频系列来加强肠道准备教育是否会提高肠道准备质量、减少重复检查的需要并提高腺瘤检出率(ADR)。患者和方法 我们利用一家三级医院的内镜检查数据进行了一项试验性、回顾性、单中心观察研究。我们对实施在线视频干预之前(对照组)和之后(视频组)两个不连续的 6 个月研究期间的结肠镜检查结果进行了比较。所有患者都接受了标准的书面和口头指导。视频组则收到一个访问视频平台的链接。主要结果是肠道准备是否充分(根据 Aronchick 量表定义)。次要结果包括因准备不充分而重复结肠镜检查率、ADR 和无柄锯齿状病变 (SSL) 检出率。结果 视频干预组的肠道准备不足率低于对照组(6.3% vs 9.8%,P = 0.018)。因准备不足而重复结肠镜检查率(P = 0.62)、ADR(P = 0.11)或 SSL 检测率(P = 0.94)在组间无差异。多变量分析未发现任何独立的肠道准备质量预测因素。结论 我们的研究支持增加以患者为导向的新型在线教育视频资源,将其作为提高肠道准备充分度的有效工具,同时保持结肠镜检查的高质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Online patient endoscopy education platform improves outpatient bowel preparation quality: Retrospective observational study.

Background and study aims High-quality bowel preparation is integral to high-quality colonoscopy and adenoma detection. Studies evaluating the effect of pre-colonoscopy educational videos on bowel preparation quality have been variable. We investigated whether augmenting bowel preparation education using our professionally produced, patient-oriented, online educational video series would improve preparation quality, reduce need for repeat procedures, and improve adenoma detection rate (ADR). Patients and methods We conducted a pilot, retrospective, single-center observational study using endoscopy data from a tertiary hospital. Colonoscopy outcomes were compared between two discrete 6-month study periods, before (control group) and after (video group) implementation of the online video intervention. All patients received standard-of-care written and verbal instructions. The video group received a link providing access to the video platform. Primary outcome was adequacy of bowel preparation (defined by the Aronchick Scale). Secondary outcomes included rate of repeat colonoscopy due to inadequate preparation, ADR, and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate. Results The video intervention group had a lower rate of inadequate bowel preparation compared with the control group (6.3% vs 9.8%, P = 0.018). There was no difference between groups in rate of repeat colonoscopies due to inadequate preparation ( P = 0.62), ADR ( P = 0.11), or SSL detection rate ( P = 0.94). Multivariable analysis did not reveal any independent predictors of bowel preparation quality. Conclusions Our study supports the addition of a novel patient-oriented online educational video resource as an effective tool in enhancing bowel preparation adequacy while maintaining provision of high-quality colonoscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1