监测机械通气过程中呼吸肌的用力情况。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001229
Julien P van Oosten, Evangelia Akoumianaki, Annemijn H Jonkman
{"title":"监测机械通气过程中呼吸肌的用力情况。","authors":"Julien P van Oosten, Evangelia Akoumianaki, Annemijn H Jonkman","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarize basic physiological concepts of breathing effort and outline various methods for monitoring effort of inspiratory and expiratory muscles.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the reference standard for respiratory muscle effort quantification, but various noninvasive screening tools have been proposed. Expiratory occlusion pressures (P0.1 and Pocc) could inform about low and high effort and the resulting lung stress, with Pocc outperforming P0.1 in identifying high effort. The pressure muscle index during an inspiratory hold could unveil inspiratory muscle effort, however obtaining a reliable inspiratory plateau can be difficult. Surface electromyography has the potential for inspiratory effort estimation, yet this is technically challenging for real-time assessment. Expiratory muscle activation is common in the critically ill warranting their assessment, that is, via gastric pressure monitoring. Expiratory muscle activation also impacts inspiratory effort interpretation which could result in both under- and overestimation of the resulting lung stress. There is likely a future role for machine learning applications to automate breathing effort monitoring at the bedside.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Different tools are available for monitoring the respiratory muscles' effort during mechanical ventilation - from noninvasive screening tools to more invasive quantification methods. This could facilitate a lung and respiratory muscle-protective ventilation approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring respiratory muscles effort during mechanical ventilation.\",\"authors\":\"Julien P van Oosten, Evangelia Akoumianaki, Annemijn H Jonkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarize basic physiological concepts of breathing effort and outline various methods for monitoring effort of inspiratory and expiratory muscles.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the reference standard for respiratory muscle effort quantification, but various noninvasive screening tools have been proposed. Expiratory occlusion pressures (P0.1 and Pocc) could inform about low and high effort and the resulting lung stress, with Pocc outperforming P0.1 in identifying high effort. The pressure muscle index during an inspiratory hold could unveil inspiratory muscle effort, however obtaining a reliable inspiratory plateau can be difficult. Surface electromyography has the potential for inspiratory effort estimation, yet this is technically challenging for real-time assessment. Expiratory muscle activation is common in the critically ill warranting their assessment, that is, via gastric pressure monitoring. Expiratory muscle activation also impacts inspiratory effort interpretation which could result in both under- and overestimation of the resulting lung stress. There is likely a future role for machine learning applications to automate breathing effort monitoring at the bedside.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Different tools are available for monitoring the respiratory muscles' effort during mechanical ventilation - from noninvasive screening tools to more invasive quantification methods. This could facilitate a lung and respiratory muscle-protective ventilation approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001229\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:总结呼吸用力的基本生理概念,概述监测吸气和呼气肌肉用力的各种方法:食管压力(Pes)测量是呼吸肌用力量化的参考标准,但也提出了各种无创筛查工具。呼气闭塞压(P0.1 和 Pocc)可告知低强度和高强度以及由此产生的肺压力,其中 Pocc 在识别高强度方面优于 P0.1。吸气屏气时的压力肌肉指数可以揭示吸气肌肉的用力情况,但要获得可靠的吸气高原可能比较困难。表面肌电图具有估计吸气用力的潜力,但对实时评估而言,这在技术上具有挑战性。呼气肌激活在重症患者中很常见,需要通过胃压监测进行评估。呼气肌肉的激活也会影响吸气力度的解释,从而导致对肺部压力的低估或高估。总结:从无创筛查工具到更具创伤性的量化方法,目前已有不同的工具可用于监测机械通气过程中的呼吸肌用力情况。这将有助于采用保护肺和呼吸肌的通气方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring respiratory muscles effort during mechanical ventilation.

Purpose of review: To summarize basic physiological concepts of breathing effort and outline various methods for monitoring effort of inspiratory and expiratory muscles.

Recent findings: Esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the reference standard for respiratory muscle effort quantification, but various noninvasive screening tools have been proposed. Expiratory occlusion pressures (P0.1 and Pocc) could inform about low and high effort and the resulting lung stress, with Pocc outperforming P0.1 in identifying high effort. The pressure muscle index during an inspiratory hold could unveil inspiratory muscle effort, however obtaining a reliable inspiratory plateau can be difficult. Surface electromyography has the potential for inspiratory effort estimation, yet this is technically challenging for real-time assessment. Expiratory muscle activation is common in the critically ill warranting their assessment, that is, via gastric pressure monitoring. Expiratory muscle activation also impacts inspiratory effort interpretation which could result in both under- and overestimation of the resulting lung stress. There is likely a future role for machine learning applications to automate breathing effort monitoring at the bedside.

Summary: Different tools are available for monitoring the respiratory muscles' effort during mechanical ventilation - from noninvasive screening tools to more invasive quantification methods. This could facilitate a lung and respiratory muscle-protective ventilation approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
期刊最新文献
Advances in critical care nephrology through artificial intelligence. Cerebral oximetry in high-risk surgical patients: where are we? Emergency airway management in the post anesthesia care unit. Fluid management in the septic peri-operative patient. Is tranexamic acid appropriate for all patients undergoing high-risk surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1