治疗大隐静脉或股静脉交界处复发性静脉曲张疾病的干预措施:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Angiology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05323-9
Alkis Bontinis, Vangelis Bontinis, Georgios Koudounas, Argirios Giannopoulos, Christos Karkos, Dimitrios Virvilis, Angeliki Chorti, Kiriakos Ktenidis
{"title":"治疗大隐静脉或股静脉交界处复发性静脉曲张疾病的干预措施:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alkis Bontinis, Vangelis Bontinis, Georgios Koudounas, Argirios Giannopoulos, Christos Karkos, Dimitrios Virvilis, Angeliki Chorti, Kiriakos Ktenidis","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05323-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We investigated the safety and feasibility of the available interventions in the treatment of recurrent varicose vein disease.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic search on Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published by August 2024 was performed. Primary endpoints included duplex ultrasonography (DUS)-identified recurrence and clinical recurrence.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twenty-eight studies, eleven describing endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA), four ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), and thirteen surgery (high ligation with or without stripping) encompassing 2228 limbs, were included. The overall DUS-detected recurrence estimate was 11.84% (95% CI: 7.15-17.40). EVTA displayed the lowest recurrence of 4.27% (95% CI: 0.37-10.75), followed by UGFS 11.19% (95% CI: 6.80-16.42) and surgery 23.27% (95% CI: 15.35-32.19). Statistically significant differences were observed between surgery and both EVTA (P<0.01) and UGFS (P=0.01). The overall clinical recurrence estimate was 24.91% (95% CI: 10.40-42.96) with EVTA portraying the lowest clinical recurrence of 2.37% (95% CI: 0.00-16.81), followed by surgery 31.08% (95% CI: 14.43-50.63). Subgroup analysis identified statistically significant differences between EVTA and surgery (P=0.01). Whereas non-statistically significant differences were identified between the included interventions regarding paresthesia and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), surgery exhibited higher wound infection estimates compared to EVTA of 0.00% (95% CI: 0.00-0.80) versus 4.34% (95% CI: 2.21-7.02, P<0.01). The pooled hematoma and lymphatic complication estimates for surgery were 5.04% (95% CI: 0.50-12.87) and 5.71% (95% CI: 2.91-9.22) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review demonstrated the superior efficacy of EVTA over surgery in treating recurrent varicose vein disease corroborating its use as the preferred treatment, when feasible. Additionally, UGFS displayed comparable outcomes to EVTA. The notable recurrence estimates associated with surgery call into question its suitability within this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions for the treatment of recurrent varicose vein disease arising from the saphenofemoral junction or the great saphenous vein: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alkis Bontinis, Vangelis Bontinis, Georgios Koudounas, Argirios Giannopoulos, Christos Karkos, Dimitrios Virvilis, Angeliki Chorti, Kiriakos Ktenidis\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05323-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We investigated the safety and feasibility of the available interventions in the treatment of recurrent varicose vein disease.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic search on Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published by August 2024 was performed. Primary endpoints included duplex ultrasonography (DUS)-identified recurrence and clinical recurrence.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twenty-eight studies, eleven describing endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA), four ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), and thirteen surgery (high ligation with or without stripping) encompassing 2228 limbs, were included. The overall DUS-detected recurrence estimate was 11.84% (95% CI: 7.15-17.40). EVTA displayed the lowest recurrence of 4.27% (95% CI: 0.37-10.75), followed by UGFS 11.19% (95% CI: 6.80-16.42) and surgery 23.27% (95% CI: 15.35-32.19). Statistically significant differences were observed between surgery and both EVTA (P<0.01) and UGFS (P=0.01). The overall clinical recurrence estimate was 24.91% (95% CI: 10.40-42.96) with EVTA portraying the lowest clinical recurrence of 2.37% (95% CI: 0.00-16.81), followed by surgery 31.08% (95% CI: 14.43-50.63). Subgroup analysis identified statistically significant differences between EVTA and surgery (P=0.01). Whereas non-statistically significant differences were identified between the included interventions regarding paresthesia and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), surgery exhibited higher wound infection estimates compared to EVTA of 0.00% (95% CI: 0.00-0.80) versus 4.34% (95% CI: 2.21-7.02, P<0.01). The pooled hematoma and lymphatic complication estimates for surgery were 5.04% (95% CI: 0.50-12.87) and 5.71% (95% CI: 2.91-9.22) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review demonstrated the superior efficacy of EVTA over surgery in treating recurrent varicose vein disease corroborating its use as the preferred treatment, when feasible. Additionally, UGFS displayed comparable outcomes to EVTA. The notable recurrence estimates associated with surgery call into question its suitability within this context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05323-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05323-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:我们研究了治疗复发性静脉曲张疾病的现有干预措施的安全性和可行性:我们调查了治疗复发性静脉曲张疾病的现有干预措施的安全性和可行性:在 Medline、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上对 2024 年 8 月之前发表的文章进行了系统检索。主要终点包括双相超声波(DUS)确定的复发和临床复发:共纳入 28 项研究,其中 11 项研究描述了静脉腔内热消融术 (EVTA),4 项研究描述了超声引导下泡沫硬化剂注射疗法 (UGFS),13 项研究描述了手术治疗(带或不带剥离的高位结扎术),共涉及 2228 个肢体。DUS检测到的总复发率估计为11.84%(95% CI:7.15-17.40)。EVTA的复发率最低,为4.27%(95% CI:0.37-10.75),其次是UGFS的11.19%(95% CI:6.80-16.42)和手术的23.27%(95% CI:15.35-32.19)。手术与 EVTA(PConclusions.)之间存在明显的统计学差异:本综述表明,在治疗复发性静脉曲张疾病方面,EVTA 的疗效优于手术,这也证实了在可行的情况下,EVTA 是首选的治疗方法。此外,UGFS的疗效与EVTA相当。与手术相关的显著的复发率使人们对其是否适用提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interventions for the treatment of recurrent varicose vein disease arising from the saphenofemoral junction or the great saphenous vein: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: We investigated the safety and feasibility of the available interventions in the treatment of recurrent varicose vein disease.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic search on Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published by August 2024 was performed. Primary endpoints included duplex ultrasonography (DUS)-identified recurrence and clinical recurrence.

Evidence synthesis: Twenty-eight studies, eleven describing endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA), four ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), and thirteen surgery (high ligation with or without stripping) encompassing 2228 limbs, were included. The overall DUS-detected recurrence estimate was 11.84% (95% CI: 7.15-17.40). EVTA displayed the lowest recurrence of 4.27% (95% CI: 0.37-10.75), followed by UGFS 11.19% (95% CI: 6.80-16.42) and surgery 23.27% (95% CI: 15.35-32.19). Statistically significant differences were observed between surgery and both EVTA (P<0.01) and UGFS (P=0.01). The overall clinical recurrence estimate was 24.91% (95% CI: 10.40-42.96) with EVTA portraying the lowest clinical recurrence of 2.37% (95% CI: 0.00-16.81), followed by surgery 31.08% (95% CI: 14.43-50.63). Subgroup analysis identified statistically significant differences between EVTA and surgery (P=0.01). Whereas non-statistically significant differences were identified between the included interventions regarding paresthesia and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), surgery exhibited higher wound infection estimates compared to EVTA of 0.00% (95% CI: 0.00-0.80) versus 4.34% (95% CI: 2.21-7.02, P<0.01). The pooled hematoma and lymphatic complication estimates for surgery were 5.04% (95% CI: 0.50-12.87) and 5.71% (95% CI: 2.91-9.22) respectively.

Conclusions: This review demonstrated the superior efficacy of EVTA over surgery in treating recurrent varicose vein disease corroborating its use as the preferred treatment, when feasible. Additionally, UGFS displayed comparable outcomes to EVTA. The notable recurrence estimates associated with surgery call into question its suitability within this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
期刊最新文献
The rheolytic thrombectomy AngioJet™ is a safe and technically feasible method for treating acute and sub-acute occluding lesions in the visceral arteries. Interventions for the treatment of recurrent varicose vein disease arising from the saphenofemoral junction or the great saphenous vein: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Management of arterial hypertension in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in superficial venous thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of light compression on chronic venous disease, edema and comfort in women during pregnancy and postpartum period: a prospective randomized study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1